Competing ParA Structures Space Bacterial Plasmids Equally over the Nucleoid

Low copy number plasmids in bacteria require segregation for stable inheritance through cell division. This is often achieved by a parABC locus, comprising an ATPase ParA, DNA-binding protein ParB and a parC region, encoding ParB-binding sites. These minimal components space plasmids equally over the nucleoid, yet the underlying mechanism is not understood. Here we investigate a model where ParA-ATP can dynamically associate to the nucleoid and is hydrolyzed by plasmid-associated ParB, thereby creating nucleoid-bound, self-organizing ParA concentration gradients. We show mathematically that differences between competing ParA concentrations on either side of a plasmid can specify regular plasmid positioning. Such positioning can be achieved regardless of the exact mechanism of plasmid movement, including plasmid diffusion with ParA-mediated immobilization or directed plasmid motion induced by ParB/parC-stimulated ParA structure disassembly. However, we find experimentally that parABC from Escherichia coli plasmid pB171 increases plasmid mobility, inconsistent with diffusion/immobilization. Instead our observations favor directed plasmid motion. Our model predicts less oscillatory ParA dynamics than previously believed, a prediction we verify experimentally. We also show that ParA localization and plasmid positioning depend on the underlying nucleoid morphology, indicating that the chromosomal architecture constrains ParA structure formation. Our directed motion model unifies previously contradictory models for plasmid segregation and provides a robust mechanistic basis for self-organized plasmid spacing that may be widely applicable.

[1]  K. Gerdes,et al.  Bacterial mitosis: partitioning protein ParA oscillates in spiral‐shaped structures and positions plasmids at mid‐cell , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[2]  O. Sliusarenko,et al.  High‐throughput, subpixel precision analysis of bacterial morphogenesis and intracellular spatio‐temporal dynamics , 2011, Molecular microbiology.

[3]  J. Pogliano,et al.  Intracellular mobility of plasmid DNA is limited by the ParA family of partitioning systems , 2008, Molecular microbiology.

[4]  M. Waldor,et al.  A dynamic, mitotic-like mechanism for bacterial chromosome segregation. , 2006, Genes & development.

[5]  Paul A. Wiggins,et al.  Strong intranucleoid interactions organize the Escherichia coli chromosome into a nucleoid filament , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Aidan P Thompson,et al.  A constant-time kinetic Monte Carlo algorithm for simulation of large biochemical reaction networks. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[7]  G. Jensen,et al.  The Helical MreB Cytoskeleton in Escherichia coli MC1000/pLE7 Is an Artifact of the N-Terminal Yellow Fluorescent Protein Tag , 2012, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  S. Diekmann,et al.  Centromere anatomy in the multidrug-resistant pathogen Enterococcus faecium , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Michael Unser,et al.  A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[10]  J. Aten,et al.  Measurement of co‐localization of objects in dual‐colour confocal images , 1993, Journal of microscopy.

[11]  D. Sherratt,et al.  Spatial and temporal organization of replicating Escherichia coli chromosomes , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[12]  Stéphane Robin,et al.  The MatP/matS Site-Specific System Organizes the Terminus Region of the E. coli Chromosome into a Macrodomain , 2008, Cell.

[13]  C. Jacobs-Wagner,et al.  Evidence for a DNA-relay mechanism in ParABS-mediated chromosome segregation , 2014, eLife.

[14]  M. Howard,et al.  Pushing and Pulling in Prokaryotic DNA Segregation , 2010, Cell.

[15]  Nancy Kleckner,et al.  Four-Dimensional Imaging of E. coli Nucleoid Organization and Dynamics in Living Cells , 2013, Cell.

[16]  Jeroen S. van Zon,et al.  Movement and equipositioning of plasmids by ParA filament disassembly , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  K. Nordström,et al.  Role of the mukB gene in chromosome and plasmid partition in Escherichia coli , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[18]  S. Austin,et al.  P1 Plasmid Segregation: Accurate Redistribution by Dynamic Plasmid Pairing and Separation , 2009, Journal of bacteriology.

[19]  P. Silver,et al.  Spatially Ordered Dynamics of the Bacterial Carbon Fixation Machinery , 2010, Science.

[20]  J. Theriot,et al.  Bacterial chromosomal loci move subdiffusively through a viscoelastic cytoplasm. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[21]  H. Niki,et al.  Partitioning of P1 plasmids by gradual distribution of the ATPase ParA , 2010, Molecular microbiology.

[22]  Y. Harada,et al.  ParA‐mediated plasmid partition driven by protein pattern self‐organization , 2013, The EMBO journal.

[23]  R. Ghirlando,et al.  ATP control of dynamic P1 ParA–DNA interactions: a key role for the nucleoid in plasmid partition , 2010, Molecular microbiology.

[24]  Reid C. Johnson,et al.  Variation of the folding and dynamics of the Escherichia coli chromosome with growth conditions , 2012, Molecular microbiology.

[25]  K. Neuman,et al.  A propagating ATPase gradient drives transport of surface-confined cellular cargo , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Jessica K. Polka,et al.  Accessory factors promote AlfA-dependent plasmid segregation by regulating filament nucleation, disassembly, and bundling , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  G. Wadhams,et al.  ParA-like protein uses nonspecific chromosomal DNA binding to partition protein complexes , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Michael A Thompson,et al.  Analytical tools to distinguish the effects of localization error, confinement, and medium elasticity on the velocity autocorrelation function. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[29]  J. Löwe,et al.  Centromere Pairing by a Plasmid-encoded Type I ParB Protein* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  K. Mizuuchi,et al.  Cell-free study of F plasmid partition provides evidence for cargo transport by a diffusion-ratchet mechanism , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  D. Sherratt,et al.  Regular cellular distribution of plasmids by oscillating and filament‐forming ParA ATPase of plasmid pB171 , 2006, Molecular microbiology.

[32]  L. Gagnier,et al.  Partition of P1 plasmids in Escherichia coli mukB chromosomal partition mutants , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[33]  K. Kaneko,et al.  Chemophoresis as a driving force for intracellular organization: Theory and application to plasmid partitioning , 2011, Biophysics.

[34]  L. Shapiro,et al.  A spindle-like apparatus guides bacterial chromosome segregation , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[35]  D. Sherratt,et al.  The Escherichia coli SMC Complex, MukBEF, Shapes Nucleoid Organization Independently of DNA Replication , 2012, Journal of bacteriology.

[36]  K. Gerdes,et al.  Regulatory Cross-talk in the Double par Locus of Plasmid pB171* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  Marcelo Nöllmann,et al.  Thirty years of Escherichia coli DNA gyrase: from in vivo function to single-molecule mechanism. , 2007, Biochimie.

[38]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  Filament Depolymerization Can Explain Chromosome Pulling during Bacterial Mitosis , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  K. Gerdes,et al.  The double par locus of virulence factor pB171: DNA segregation is correlated with oscillation of ParA , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  C. O’Hern,et al.  The Bacterial Cytoplasm Has Glass-like Properties and Is Fluidized by Metabolic Activity , 2014, Cell.

[41]  K. Namba,et al.  A Bipolar Spindle of Antiparallel ParM Filaments Drives Bacterial Plasmid Segregation , 2012, Science.

[42]  T. Ogura,et al.  Partitioning of a mini-F plasmid into anucleate cells of the mukB null mutant , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.