Forestland owners’ willingness to consider multiple ways of supplying biomass simultaneously: Implications for biofuel incentive policies

Because socioeconomic based approaches account for relevant limiting and motivating factors, they provide a more realistic measurement of forestland owners’ willingness to supply biomass for bioenergy production- information useful to policy makers in setting production targets and in designing relevant incentive programs. Although forestland owners can supply biomass using different means, including supplying biomass from existing stands and changing land use to establish feedstock plantation, among others, previous studies mostly focus only on a given way of supplying biomass at a time. This produces incomplete information that adversely affects its use. By presenting survey takers in Virginia and Texas three different ways of supplying biomass at the same time, we determine forestland owners’ willingness to consider multiple ways of supplying biomass simultaneously and identify the factors that predict such behavior, assess overlap in forestland owners across the different ways of supplying biomass, and assess if and how respondents’ forest management plans and sustainability concerns correspond with their supply decision. Our results show a higher and more articulated rate of willingness to supply biomass than reported in previous studies. The results also suggest that opportunities exist for synergizing programs that incentivize disparate ways of supplying biomass.

[1]  Megan Stubbs Biomass Crop Assistance Program (BCAP): Status and Issues , 2010 .

[2]  C. Bailey,et al.  Landowner Willingness to Supply Timber for Biofuel: Results of an Alabama Survey of Family Forest Landowners , 2011 .

[3]  D. Grebner,et al.  An assessment of nonindustrial private forest landowner willingness to harvest woody biomass in support of bioenergy production in Mississippi: A contingent rating approach , 2012 .

[4]  A. Agresti An introduction to categorical data analysis , 1997 .

[5]  Sayeed R. Mehmood,et al.  Factors affecting nonindustrial private forest landowners' willingness to supply woody biomass for bioenergy , 2011 .

[6]  Bill Canis,et al.  Alternative Fuel and Advanced Vehicle Technology Incentives: A Summary of Federal Programs , 2012 .

[7]  Zhao Ma,et al.  Social versus biophysical availability of wood in the northern United States. , 2010 .

[8]  M. Monroe,et al.  A Framework for Environmental Education Strategies , 2008 .

[9]  Kathryn G. Arano,et al.  An evaluation of West Virginia's Managed Timberland Tax Incentive Program , 2011 .

[10]  P. Lal,et al.  Determinants of enrollment in public incentive programs for forest management and their effect on future programs for woody bioenergy: evidence from Virginia and Texas , 2016 .

[11]  Effect of the Federal Estate Tax on Nonindustrial Private Forest Holdings , 2006 .

[12]  F. Aguilar,et al.  Non-industrial private forest owner's willingness-to-harvest: How higher timber prices influence woody biomass supply , 2014 .

[13]  G. C. Shivan,et al.  Factors influencing nonindustrial private forest landowners' policy preference for promoting bioenergy , 2010 .

[14]  W. Aust,et al.  Biomass harvesting and soil productivity: is the science meeting our policy needs? , 2014 .

[15]  T. Straka Taxonomic Review of Classical and Current Literature on the Perennial American Family Forest Problem , 2011 .

[16]  J. Munsell,et al.  Factors affecting forestland owners' allocation of non-forested land to pine plantation for bioenergy in Virginia , 2016 .

[17]  Christopher S. Galik,et al.  Forest biomass supply in the southeastern United States - implications for industrial roundwood and bioenergy production. , 2009 .

[18]  Susan K. Jacobson,et al.  Conservation Education and Outreach Techniques , 2006 .

[19]  Randy Schnepf Cellulosic Ethanol: Feedstocks, Conversion Technologies, Economics, and Policy Options , 2010 .

[20]  Martha C. Monroe,et al.  Woody biomass outreach in the southern United States: A case study , 2011 .

[21]  Scott M. Barrett,et al.  Characteristics of Virginia's Logging Businesses in a Changing Timber Market , 2010 .

[22]  Jefferson H. Mayo,et al.  Causes and costs of unused logging production capacity in the southern United States and Maine , 2002 .

[23]  T. Stevens,et al.  Family forest owner preferences for biomass harvesting in Massachusetts , 2012 .

[24]  T. Koontz,et al.  Money Talks?But to Whom? Financial Versus Nonmonetary Motivations in Land Use Decisions , 2001 .

[25]  S. Broussard,et al.  Private forest policy tools: A national survey exploring the American public's perceptions and support , 2006 .

[26]  A. Ek,et al.  Logging business practices and perspectives on harvesting forest residues for energy: a Minnesota case study. , 2011 .

[27]  D. Hodges,et al.  Factors Influencing Landowner Interest in Managing Wildlife and Avian Habitat on Private Forestland , 2009 .