Geometric morphometric study of the regional variation of modern human craniofacial form.

The regional variability of the modern human craniofacial form is of importance to debates about human origins. The study of craniofacial form has generally been carried out either by interlandmark distance measurement and analysis or by observation and character scoring. In this study of four modern human groups (Eskimo/Inuit, African, Australian, and Romano-British), nine craniofacial landmark coordinates were recorded by extraction from laser scans. The coordinates were studied by geometric morphometrics, and a regression analysis was used to investigate the dominant variability in shape within and between groups. Statistical tests of shape difference between groups were carried out. By these methods, the statistical patterns of shape variability and their geometric interpretations were studied on a common basis. The results were found to be in agreement with the classic studies of Howells ([1989:189] Pap Peabody Mus 79), and show the potential of this approach for future research.

[1]  T. Hanihara.  Frontal and facial flatness of major human populations. , 2000, American journal of physical anthropology.

[2]  D. Slice.  Three-Dimensional Generalized Resistant Fitting and the Comparison of Least-Squares and Resistant-Fit Residuals , 1996 .

[3]  F. Rohlf,et al.  A revolution morphometrics. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  D. Kendall.  SHAPE MANIFOLDS, PROCRUSTEAN METRICS, AND COMPLEX PROJECTIVE SPACES , 1984 .

[5]  G. P. Rightmire.  The evolution of modern human diversity: by M.M. Lahr Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Studies in Biological Anthropology 18, 1996. £35.00 hbk (xvi + 416 pages) ISBN 0 521 47393 4 , 1996 .

[6]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  A Comment on Shearing as a Method for “Size Correction” , 1987 .

[7]  M. Wolpoff,et al.  Race And Human Evolution , 1997 .

[8]  L. Aiello,et al.  A technique for establishing the identity of ‘isolated’ fossil hominin limb bones , 1998, Journal of anatomy.

[9]  P. O'higgins,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in hominoids: further studies of craniofacial shape differences in Pan, Gorilla and Pongo , 1993 .

[10]  Allocation of crania to groups via the "new morphometry". , 1999, Journal of forensic sciences.

[11]  Joan T. Richtsmeier,et al.  Advances in Anthropological Morphometrics , 1992 .

[12]  Charles A. Mosse,et al.  A laser scanning system for the measurement of facial surface morphology , 1989 .

[13]  P. O'higgins,et al.  Facial growth in Cercocebus torquatus: an application of three‐dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to the study of morphological variation , 1998, Journal of anatomy.

[14]  D. Kendall,et al.  The Riemannian Structure of Euclidean Shape Spaces: A Novel Environment for Statistics , 1993 .

[15]  J. M. Lynch,et al.  Geometric morphometrics in primatology: craniofacial variation in Homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes. , 1996, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[16]  V. Ferrario,et al.  Preliminary Evaluation of an Electromagnetic Three-Dimensional Digitizer in Facial Anthropometry , 1998, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[17]  C. Goodall.  Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape , 1991 .

[18]  S. Lele,et al.  Euclidean distance matrix analysis: a coordinate-free approach for comparing biological shapes using landmark data. , 1991, American journal of physical anthropology.

[19]  F. James Rohlf.  On the use of shape spaces to compare morphometric methods , 2000 .

[20]  A. Peterson,et al.  Technical note: Different techniques, different results--a comparison of photogrammetric and caliper-derived measurements. , 1998, American journal of physical anthropology.

[21]  Lucia Allen Yaroch,et al.  Shape analysis using the thin‐plate spline: Neanderthal cranial shape as an example , 1996 .

[22]  T. Hanihara.  Comparison of craniofacial features of major human groups. , 1996, American journal of physical anthropology.

[23]  John M. Lynch,et al.  Sexual Dimorphism in the Craniofacial Skeleton of Modern Humans , 1996 .

[24]  Ramesh C. Jain,et al.  Invariant surface characteristics for 3D object recognition in range images , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[25]  F. Rohlf,et al.  NTSYS-pc Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, version 2.1: Owner manual , 1992 .

[26]  P. O’Higgins.  The study of morphological variation in the hominid fossil record: biology, landmarks and geometry , 2000, Journal of anatomy.

[27]  K. Mardia,et al.  Statistical Shape Analysis , 1998 .

[28]  F J Rohlf,et al.  On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny. , 1998, Systematic biology.

[29]  F J Rohlf,et al.  Statistical power comparisons among alternative morphometric methods. , 2000, American journal of physical anthropology.

[30]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Chi-Square Test of Biological Space Curve Affinities , 1996 .

[31]  F. Rohlf.  Shape Statistics: Procrustes Superimpositions and Tangent Spaces , 1999 .

[32]  X. Penin,et al.  Comparaison tridimensionnelle des crânes de Pan et Pongo par superpositions procrustéennes , 1999 .

[33]  C J Valeri,et al.  Capturing data from three-dimensional surfaces using fuzzy landmarks. , 1998, American journal of physical anthropology.