New Objects, Not New Features, Trigger the Attentional Blink

When two different targets must be selected from a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) of images, perception of the second target will be markedly reduced if it is presented within about a half second of the first. Known as the attentional blink (AB), this effect reflects temporal limitations in attentional processes enabling awareness of image representations. I tested whether these limitations occur at an object or feature level of processing by presenting (in RSVP) multiple images of the same (old) object depicted in different orientations. Targets were defined by new features added either to this or to a new object. When the first target feature appeared on the old object, no AB effects were found even when the second target was a new object. When a new object carried the first target feature, an AB effect was found even when the second target feature appeared on the same “new” object. The AB appears to reflect limitations in the creation of new object representations, rather than temporal limitations of awareness per se.

[1]  K. Shapiro,et al.  The attentional blink , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  S. Grossberg The Attentive Brain , 1995 .

[3]  V. Lollo,et al.  Low-level masking in the attentional blink , 1997 .

[4]  R. Parasuraman The attentive brain , 1998 .

[5]  D. Broadbent,et al.  From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  M. Chun,et al.  Types and tokens in visual processing: a double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  Visual attention and the binding problem: A neurophysiological perspective , 1998 .

[8]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  A. Treisman The binding problem , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  N. Kanwisher Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation , 1987, Cognition.

[12]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Similarity determines the attentional blink. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  M. Potter,et al.  Recognition memory for a rapid sequence of pictures. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  W. Donaldson Measuring recognition memory. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  J. Driver,et al.  Priming from the Attentional Blink: A Failure to Extract Visual Tokens but Not Visual Types , 1997 .

[18]  M. Farah,et al.  Does visual attention select objects or locations? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  E. Vogel,et al.  Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink , 1996, Nature.