Digital Media and Informal Learning: Alteration Mechanism and Captured Episodes

The main part of human learning happens en passant and outside of the formal education system - called informal learning. Even pupils and students spend more time in front of digital media screens than in formal settings inside schools. Consequently, their learning is strongly impacted by the use of digital media in everyday life. Nevertheless, current research, educational practice, and design of learning systems have their focus mostly on courseware and distance education for formal settings. The current study captures 373 informal learning episodes in everyday life of 77 learners in the domains of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning. Autovideography is used based on the day reconstruction method (DRM) and selected self-monitoring (SSM). Additional episodes are captured applying participatory action research (PAR) in extensive field studies in different cultures. The episodes are analyzed using qualitative content analysis and grounded theory based on selected learning theories to develop a category system of alteration mechanism for Learners’ perception sphere. The study shows that digital media do not alter informal learning in a simple cause-effect relationship but in a complex system of effects. Learners perception sphere obtain altered conditions for information assimilation on a learning topic. That can lead to informal learning in the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domain. Related research with a focus on information assimilation and learning as media pedagogy, cognitive science, or learning psychology can use those identified mechanism for a differentiated view on digital media and consequently for more specific and sustainable results. One mechanism identified is the extension of linear learning content to a multi-dimensional perception sphere that is characterized by high interactivity, personalization, associativity, contingency, and often playfulness. Learners should become aware of the differences between the secondary experiences formed by that mechanism and primary experiences in the physical world to adjust their perception and media usage. Educators can respond by conveying key skills qualification as well as linking problems, processes, and contents between formal and informal settings. An important next research step is capturing and analyzing learning episodes in additional cultural areas to allow a fresh, quite different view on the widely discussed phenomena of digital divide.

[1]  Linda M. Harasim,et al.  Learning Theory and Online Technologies , 2011 .

[2]  Otto Petrovic,et al.  3.3 The Internet of Things as Disruptive Innovation for the Advertising Ecosystem , 2017 .

[3]  D. Kahneman,et al.  A Survey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience: The Day Reconstruction Method , 2004, Science.

[4]  J. Henrich,et al.  The weirdest people in the world? , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  D. Krathwohl A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview , 2002 .

[6]  Sara Kindon,et al.  Participatory action research : origins, approaches and methods. , 2007 .

[7]  Ludwig Wittgenstein,et al.  Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung , 2021, Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung: die Hundertjahrsausgabe.

[8]  Viktor Mayer-Schönberger,et al.  Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age , 2009 .

[9]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Kathy Charmaz Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Sage 224 £19.99 0761973532 0761973532 [Formula: see text]. , 2006, Nurse researcher.

[10]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[11]  Harald Selke Sekundäre Medienfunktionen für die Konzeption von Lernplattformen für die Präsenzlehre , 2008 .

[12]  Otto Petrovic,et al.  Digital Media's Alteration Mechanism for Informal Learning , 2018, CSEDU.

[13]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  The Day Reconstruction Method (DRM): Instrument Documentation , 2004 .

[14]  S. Levinson,et al.  WEIRD languages have misled us, too , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  Vannevar Bush,et al.  As we may think , 1945, INTR.

[16]  G. Bateson,et al.  STEPS TO AN ECOLOGY OF MIND COLLECTED ESSAYS IN ANTHROPOLOGY, PSYCHIATRY, EVOLUTION, AND EPISTEMOLOGY , 2006 .

[17]  Caroline C. Wang,et al.  Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment , 1997, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[18]  Daniel J. Marcucci Louis Cohen, Lawrence Manion, & Keith Morrison (2011). Research methods in education (7a ed.). New York: Routledge. , 2011 .

[19]  P. Tennent,et al.  Worth a Thousand Words? Advantages, Challenges and Opportunities in Working with Photovoice as a Qualitative Research Method with Youth and their Families , 2016 .

[20]  H. Maturana,et al.  The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding , 2007 .

[21]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[22]  P. Mayring Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution , 2014 .

[23]  R. Pain,et al.  Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place , 2007 .

[24]  Nathan Coppedge,et al.  Systems Theory , 2016 .

[25]  Ernst von Glasersfeld,et al.  A Constructivist Approach to Teaching , 2012 .

[26]  Juho Hamari,et al.  What is eSports and why do people watch it? , 2017, Internet Res..

[27]  Ramón Salaverría Tipología de los cibermedios periodísticos: bases teóricas para su clasificación , 2017 .

[28]  Otto Petrovic D-Move: Ten Years Experience with a Learning Environment for Digital Natives , 2017, CSEDU.