Toxicological evaluations of carcinogens and noncarcinogens: pros and cons of different approaches.

Toxicological evaluations are performed to provide estimates of the safety/risk entailed in specified exposures to chemicals. This paper presents the two common approaches to toxicological evaluations. One of these assumes the presence of threshold doses. It involves determination of no-effect levels and extrapolation to acceptable daily intakes in man. This procedure has been widely and successfully used for noncarcinogens. For carcinogens, a number of mathematical models have been proposed for estimating the level of risk associated with a specified exposure level or the dose that is considered virtually safe, e.g., with a risk level of 10(-6). Variations of these major approaches are also outlined. Examples are included to indicate that a deficiency of significant biological data, such as an unexpected toxic effect and the marked influence of modifying factors, can invalidate a toxicological evaluation. It is also pointed out that such deficiencies cannot be overcome by any mathematical manipulation of the available dose-response data.

[1]  Gehring Pj,et al.  Application of pharmacokinetic principles in practice. , 1980 .

[2]  Taskforceofpastpresidents.  Animal data in hazard evaluation: paths and pitfalls. , 1982, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[3]  J. Litchfield.  Forecasting drug effects in man from studies in laboratory animals. , 1961, JAMA.

[4]  F. Lu,et al.  ASSESSMENTS AT AN INTERNATIONAL LEVEL OF HEALTH HAZARDS TO MAN OF CHEMICALS SHOWN TO BE CARCINOGENIC IN LABORATORY ANIMALS , 1979 .

[5]  A. B. Morrison,et al.  Factors Affecting the Cardiotoxic Potential of Cobalt , 1969 .

[6]  R. Wilson.  Risk/benefit analysis for toxic chemicals. , 1980, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[7]  H. Hodge.  Research needs in the toxicology , 1963 .

[8]  Hoel Dg.  Incorporation of background in dose-response models. , 1980 .

[9]  C S Weil,et al.  Statistics vs safety factors and scientific judgment in the evaluation of safety for man. , 1972, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[10]  J. Cornfield,et al.  Procedures for assessing risk at low levels of exposure. , 1980, Archives of toxicology. Supplement. = Archiv fur Toxikologie. Supplement.

[11]  I C Munro,et al.  Risk assessment and regulatory decision making. , 1981, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[12]  B. Stewart,et al.  Principles and Methods for Evaluating the Toxicity of Chemicals, Part I , 1980 .

[13]  R. Squire.  Ranking animal carcinogens: a proposed regulatory approach. , 1981, Science.

[14]  D G Hoel,et al.  A general scheme for the incorporation of pharmacokinetics in low-dose risk estimation for chemical carcinogenesis: example--vinyl chloride. , 1980, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[15]  D G Hoel,et al.  Estimation of risks of irreversible, delayed toxicity. , 1975, Journal of toxicology and environmental health.

[16]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[17]  A. Kolbye.  Cancer in humans: exposures and responses in a real world. , 1976, Oncology.

[18]  P. Bidstrup.  Principles Governing Consumer Safety in Relation to Pesticide Residues , 1963 .

[19]  O. G. Fitzhugh,et al.  100-Fold margin of safety , 1954 .

[20]  P. Watanabe,et al.  Resolution of dose-response toxicity data for chemicals requiring metabolic activation: example--vinyl chloride. , 1978, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.