Brain stem auditory, pattern-reversal visual, and short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials: latencies in relation to age, sex, and brain and body size.

To determine standards of normality for auditory, somatosensory and visual evoked potentials commonly used in the assessment of neurological disease, 8 AEP, 1 VEP and 12 SEP components were recorded to stimulation of left and right ears, eyes, and median nerves in 286 normal subjects ranging in age from 4 to 95 years. Peak and interpeak latencies, and left-right differences in latency, were analyzed as a function of age, sex, and estimates of brain and body size. Major features of the results were: (1) Peak latencies of all components showed statistically significant increases in latency with age except that VEP P100 latency decreased significantly between 4 and 19 years and did not change between 20 and 59 years. (2) In adults the peak latencies of all components were significantly later in males than in females. For AEPs and VEPs these differences were explained by sex differences in brain size, and for adult SEPs were explained by sex differences in arm and shoulder dimensions. No significant sex differences in VEP and SEP latencies were seen in children. (3) Most interpeak latencies showed significant differences in relation to age or sex. (4) Age and sex are useful predictors of latency for nearly all peak and interpeak latencies; in addition, height is a useful predictor of SEP peak latencies. (5) Left-right latency differences showed little age-related, and no sex-related, change. The interlaboratory use of these or other normative data was discussed. It was concluded that these AEP and SEP norms can probably be used in other laboratories if stimulating and recording conditions are similar. However, VEP results are difficult to transfer due to the poorly understood effects of variation in stimulus conditions. Some issues regarding the optimal characterization of norms were also discussed.

[1]  A. Dekaban,et al.  Changes in brain weights during the span of human life: Relation of brain weights to body heights and body weights , 1978, Annals of neurology.

[2]  G G Celesia,et al.  Effects of aging on visual evoked responses. , 1977, Archives of neurology.

[3]  F. Sharbrough,et al.  Visually Evoked Potentials to Electronic Pattern Reversal: Latency Variations with Gender, Age, and Technical Factors , 1979 .

[4]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials in man, monkey, cat, and rat: comparative latency analysis. , 1982, Advances in neurology.

[5]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Auditory, Somatosensory and Visual Evoked Potentials in the Diagnosis of Neuropathology: Recording Considerations and Normative Data , 1979 .

[6]  S. Jones.  Short latency potentials recorded from the neck and scalp following median nerve stimulation in man. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  C. Marsden,et al.  Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. , 1975, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  T. Allison,et al.  A comparative analysis of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials in man, monkey, cat, and rat , 1981, Experimental Neurology.

[9]  N. A. Shaw,et al.  Age-dependent changes in the latency of the pattern visual evoked potential. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  R. Cracco,et al.  Somatosensory evoked potential in man: far field potentials. , 1976, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  J Kimura,et al.  Short latency somatosensory evoked potentials following median nerve stimulation in man. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  A. Starr,et al.  Auditory brain stem responses in neurological disease. , 1975, Archives of neurology.

[13]  D. Brackmann,et al.  Acoustic tumor detection with brain stem electric response audiometry. , 1977, Archives of otolaryngology.

[14]  A. Moskowitz,et al.  Age-related changes in the latency of the visual evoked potential: Influences of check size ☆ , 1981 .

[15]  K Schmidt-Nielsen,et al.  Scaling in biology: the consequences of size. , 1975, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[16]  A. Starr,et al.  SOME APPLICATIONS OF EVOKED POTENTIALS TO PATIENTS WITH NEUROLOGICAL AND SENSORY IMPAIRMENT , 1978 .

[17]  F. Quaade,et al.  The correlation between external cranial volume and brain volume. , 1961, American journal of physical anthropology.

[18]  J. Kimura,et al.  SHORT‐LATENCY SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED POTENTIALS FOLLOWING MEDIAN NERVE STIMULATION , 1980 .

[19]  F. Sharbrough,et al.  Nonpathologic Factors Influencing Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials , 1978 .

[20]  R. Young,et al.  Brain stem auditory evoked responses: studies of waveform variations in 50 normal human subjects. , 1979, Archives of neurology.

[21]  N. A. Shaw,et al.  Central somatosensory conduction time from 10 to 79 years. , 1982, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  D. E. Shearer,et al.  The Pattern Reversal Evoked Potential: The Need for Laboratory Norms , 1980 .

[23]  M. Meulders,et al.  [Clinical-applications of Evoked-potentials] , 1980 .

[24]  G Cheron,et al.  Prevertebral (oesophageal) recording of subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials in man: the spinal P13 component and the dual nature of the spinal generators. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  W. B. Matthews,et al.  Cervical somato-sensory evoked responses in man , 1974, Nature.

[26]  W C Wiederholt,et al.  Short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials. , 1978, Archives of neurology.

[27]  M. Kjær,et al.  The value of brain stem auditory, visual and somatosensory evoked potentials and blink reflexes in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis , 1980 .

[28]  B. Cant,et al.  Conduction time in central somatosensory pathways in man. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  D L Jewett,et al.  Auditory-evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans. , 1971, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  G. Cheron,et al.  Non-cephalic reference recording of early somatosensory potentials to finger stimulation in adult or aging normal man: differentiation of widespread N18 and contralateral N20 from the prerolandic P22 and N30 components. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[31]  T Allison,et al.  SCALP AND CORTICAL RECORDINGS OF INITIAL SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX ACTIVITY TO MEDIAN NERVE STIMULATION IN MAN * , 1980, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.