E-DEMOCRACY WRIT SMALL

This article examines how elected officials' interactions with neighborhood groups, business interests, issue groups, and other stakeholders are shaped by their use of the Internet and by characteristics of local e-government infrastructure. The study utilizes data from a nationwide survey of local elected officials and from an analysis of corresponding local government websites. Results show that Internet use is associated with a significant increase in contact with stakeholders and with increasingly diverse types of communication partners, even after controlling for officials' general propensity to communicate. Both time spent on official duties and city size moderate the influence of Internet use. However, local government web sites do not appear to have a substantive influence on citizen's participation in policy making.

[1]  Alladi Venkatesh,et al.  Civil Society and Cyber Society: The Role of the Internet in Community Associations and Democratic Politics , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[2]  M. Prior,et al.  Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections , 2003 .

[3]  Pippa Norris,et al.  The Impact of the Internet on Political Activism: Evidence from Europe , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[4]  Andrew F. Hayes,et al.  A Primer on Multilevel Modeling , 2006 .

[5]  C. Ansell,et al.  Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[6]  Richard W. Davis.  The Web of Politics: The Internet's Impact on the American Political System , 1999 .

[7]  Bruce Bimber,et al.  The Internet and Political Transformation: Populism, Community, and Accelerated Pluralism , 1998, Polity.

[8]  M. Hindman.  The Myth of Digital Democracy , 2008 .

[9]  Bruce Bimber.  Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power , 2003 .

[10]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government , 2003, DG.O.

[11]  P. Norris.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2001 .

[12]  G. Browning.  Electronic Democracy , 1996 .

[13]  J. Blumler,et al.  The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy , 2009 .

[14]  M. Castells,et al.  The Informational City. Information Technology, Economic Restructuring, and the Urban-Regional Process , 1995 .

[15]  M. Mobius,et al.  Getting Closer or Drifting Apart , 2004 .

[16]  J. C. Thomas,et al.  The New Face of Government: Citizen-Initiated Contacts in the Era of E-Government , 2003 .

[17]  E. Rogers,et al.  The PEN Project in Santa Monica: Interactive Communication, Equality, and Political Action , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[18]  James H. Svara.  Official Leadership in the City: Patterns of Conflict and Cooperation , 1990 .

[19]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data , 2007 .

[20]  H. Bang,et al.  Good Governance in Network Society: Reconfiguring the Political from Politics to Policy , 2009 .

[21]  Robin Williams,et al.  Society on the line , 1999 .

[22]  Jennifer S. Evans-Cowley,et al.  E-government and Planning: Key Citizen Participation Issues and Applications , 2005 .

[23]  James N. Danziger,et al.  Computers and Politics: High Technology in American Local Governments , 1982 .

[24]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Global Village or Cyberbalkans: Modeling and Measuring the Integration of Electronic Communities , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[25]  S. Verba,et al.  The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations , 1964 .

[26]  P. Norris,et al.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement , 2001 .

[27]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Information and Expression in a Digital Age , 2005, Commun. Res..

[28]  Gro Sandkjær Hanssen,et al.  ICT in Norwegian local government – empowering the politicians? , 2007 .

[29]  W. Dutton.  Society on the line: information politics in the digital age oxford university press , 1999 .

[30]  James N. Danziger,et al.  THE IMPACTS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: AN ANALYSIS OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH FROM THE “GOLDEN AGE” OF TRANSFORMATION[1] , 2002 .

[31]  M. Castells,et al.  The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy , 2006 .

[32]  M. Castells.  GRASSROOTING THE SPACE OF FLOWS , 1999 .

[33]  D. West.  E‐Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes , 2004 .

[34]  Michael Crozier.  Listening, learning, steering: new governance, communication and interactive policy formation , 2008 .

[35]  B. Barber.  Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age , 1985 .

[36]  A. Chadwick.  Digital Network Repertoires and Organizational Hybridity , 2007 .

[37]  Signy Irene Vabo,et al.  Size and e‐Democracy: Online Participation in Norwegian Local Politics , 2009 .

[38]  S. Denters,et al.  Towards Local Governance , 2005 .

[39]  N. Roberts.  Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation , 2004 .

[40]  Lori M. Weber,et al.  Who Participates and Why? , 2003 .

[41]  Michael Margolis,et al.  Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace `Revolution′ , 2000 .

[42]  James H. Svara.  TWO DECADES OF CONTINUITY AND CHANGE IN AMERICAN CITY COUNCILS , 2003 .

[43]  D. West.  Digital Government: Technology and Public Sector Performance , 2007 .

[44]  M. J. Moon.  The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[45]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management , 1990 .

[46]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  Empirical Models of E-Government Growth in Local Governments , 2005 .

[47]  Wendy A. Schafer,et al.  Social and Civic Participation in a Community Network , 2006, Computers, Phones, and the Internet.

[48]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  Unraveling the Effects of the Internet on Political Participation? , 2003 .

[49]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[50]  C. Weare,et al.  Designing Web Technologies for Local Governance Reform: Good Management or Good Democracy? , 2000 .

[51]  M. Castells.  Communication Power: Mass Communication, Mass Self-Communication and Power Relationships in the Network Society , 2009, Media and Society.

[52]  M. Jennings,et al.  Internet Use and Civic Engagement: A Longitudinal Analysis , 2003 .

[53]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington , 2002 .

[54]  Rob Kling.  What Is Social Informatics and Why Does It Matter? , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[55]  M. Crozier,et al.  Recursive Governance: Contemporary Political Communication and Public Policy , 2007 .

[56]  R. Klotz.  The politics of Internet communication , 2003 .

[57]  Shelley Boulianne.  Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-Analysis of Research , 2009 .

[58]  Michael Goldsmith.  Size and Democracy , 2002 .

[59]  K. Kenski,et al.  Connections Between Internet Use and Political Efficacy, Knowledge, and Participation , 2006 .

[60]  M. Warschauer.  Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide , 2003 .

[61]  K. Kraemer.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM: WILL THE TIME AFTER E-GOVERNMENT BE DIFFERENT? , 2003 .