Continuous-time quantum-walk spatial search on the Bollobás scale-free network

The scale-free property emerges in various real-world networks and is an essential property that characterizes the dynamics or features of such networks. In this work, we investigate the effect of this scale-free property on a quantum information processing task of finding a marked node in the network, known as the quantum spatial search. We analyze the quantum spatial search algorithm using a continuous-time quantum walk on the Bollob\'as network, and we evaluate the time $T$ to localize the quantum walker on the marked node starting from an unbiased initial state. Our main finding is that $T$ is determined by the global structure around the marked node, while some local information of the marked node, such as the degree, does not identify $T$. We discuss this by examining the correlation between $T$ and some centrality measures of the network, and we show that the closeness centrality of the marked node is highly correlated with $T$. We also characterize the distribution of $T$ by marking different nodes in the network, which displays a multimode log-normal distribution. Especially on the Bollob\'as network, $T$ is a few orders of magnitude shorter depending on whether the marked node is adjacent to the largest degree hub node. However, as $T$ depends on the property of the marked node, one requires some amount of prior knowledge about such a property of the marked node in order to identify the optimal time to measure the quantum walker and achieve a fast search. These results indicate that the existence of the hub node in the scale-free network plays a crucial role in the quantum spatial search.

[1]  Leandros Tassiulas,et al.  Routing entanglement in the quantum internet , 2017, npj Quantum Information.

[2]  Manlio De Domenico,et al.  Complex networks from classical to quantum , 2017, Communications Physics.

[3]  W. Munro,et al.  Ergodic-localized junctions in periodically driven systems , 2018, Physical Review B.

[4]  Adam Glos,et al.  Vertices cannot be hidden from quantum spatial search for almost all random graphs , 2017, Quantum Inf. Process..

[5]  A Ferhat,et al.  Operating Quantum States in Single Magnetic Molecules: Implementation of Grover's Quantum Algorithm. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[6]  J. Wrachtrup,et al.  A molecular quantum spin network controlled by a single qubit , 2017, Science Advances.

[7]  M. Štefaňák,et al.  Perfect state transfer by means of discrete-time quantum walk search algorithms on highly symmetric graphs , 2016, 1608.00498.

[8]  Stefan Boettcher,et al.  Continuous-Time Quantum Search on Balanced Trees , 2016 .

[9]  Aaron C. E. Lee,et al.  Many-body localization in a quantum simulator with programmable random disorder , 2015, Nature Physics.

[10]  Andris Ambainis,et al.  Spatial Search by Quantum Walk is Optimal for Almost all Graphs. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[11]  Stefan Nolte,et al.  Enhancing coherent transport in a photonic network using controllable decoherence , 2015, Nature Communications.

[12]  Ginestra Bianconi,et al.  Interdisciplinary and physics challenges of network theory , 2015, 1509.00345.

[13]  Masoud Mohseni,et al.  Systematic Dimensionality Reduction for Quantum Walks: Optimal Spatial Search and Transport on Non-Regular Graphs , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[14]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Epidemic processes in complex networks , 2014, ArXiv.

[15]  Andrew M. Childs,et al.  Spatial search by continuous-time quantum walks on crystal lattices , 2014, 1403.2676.

[16]  Thomas G. Wong,et al.  Global symmetry is unnecessary for fast quantum search , 2014, 1403.2228.

[17]  Gregor Tanner,et al.  Quantum search on graphene lattices. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[18]  Ville Bergholm,et al.  Community Detection in Quantum Complex Networks , 2013, 1310.6638.

[19]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  Social Networks , 2013, Handbook of Graph Drawing and Visualization.

[20]  S. Bornholdt,et al.  Handbook of Graphs and Networks , 2012 .

[21]  S. D. Berry,et al.  Quantum-walk-based search and centrality , 2010, 1010.0764.

[22]  Amin Vahdat,et al.  Hyperbolic Geometry of Complex Networks , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  Elena Agliari,et al.  Quantum-walk approach to searching on fractal structures , 2010, 1002.1274.

[24]  Natasa Przulj,et al.  Biological network comparison using graphlet degree distribution , 2007, Bioinform..

[25]  Shuigeng Zhou,et al.  Exact solution for mean first-passage time on a pseudofractal scale-free web. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  Sergey N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Critical phenomena in complex networks , 2007, ArXiv.

[27]  Amílcar Sernadas,et al.  Quantum Computation and Information , 2006 .

[28]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[29]  Shlomo Havlin,et al.  Origins of fractality in the growth of complex networks , 2005, cond-mat/0507216.

[30]  M. Newman A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[31]  D. ben-Avraham,et al.  What is special about diffusion on scale-free nets? , 2004, cond-mat/0409465.

[32]  Chavdar Dangalchev,et al.  Generation models for scale-free networks , 2004 .

[33]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Dynamics of rumor spreading in complex networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[34]  H. Rieger,et al.  Random walks on complex networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[35]  Andrew M. Childs,et al.  Spatial search by quantum walk , 2003, quant-ph/0306054.

[36]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  The Diameter of a Scale-Free Random Graph , 2004, Comb..

[37]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Hierarchical organization in complex networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[38]  M. A. Muñoz,et al.  Scale-free networks from varying vertex intrinsic fitness. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[39]  M. Newman Spread of epidemic disease on networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[40]  Howard E. Brandt,et al.  Quantum computation and information : AMS Special Session Quantum Computation and Information, January 19-21, 2000, Washington, D.C. , 2002 .

[41]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[42]  K. Goh,et al.  Spectra and eigenvectors of scale-free networks. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Structure of growing networks with preferential linking. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[44]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[45]  P. Bonacich Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[47]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[48]  O. Bagasra,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 1914, Science.