Analysis of X-rays in bone remodelling around Active and Replace dental implants

Purpose of the study: The purpose of the study was to examine on the basis of radiographic images of bone tissue, whether there are differences in the rate of bone remodelling using different shapes of implants in the mandible and maxilla. Moreover, the study also compares texture features obtained on the basis of these images for healthy bone tissue, bone directly after implantation and after a 12-month period of prosthetic loading. Materials and Methods: The subject of the analysis was radiovisiogram images obtained from the Medical University of Bialystok from the Department of Dental Surgery. They are radiovisiogram photographs of 146 people aged 18–74, treated implantally due to missing teeth. The whole group of patients received two types of implants (Active and Replace) of the same company, made of titanium, intraosseous, screw-in. Results: It has been shown that both in the upper jaw and the mandible, the values of texture parameters obtained for bone images made after one year of prosthetic loading are closer to healthy tissue than immediately after implantation. These values for the mandible were relatively closer to those obtained on the basis of healthy tissue than those for the upper jaw. The bone around the implant with a single threading achieved better results in the mandible than the one with a double threading. Conclusion: The type of bone tissue and the shape of the implant have an impact on the achieved osseointegration. With the passage of time and the process of bone remodelling, the damaged tissue returns to its normal structure.

[1]  L. Guida,et al.  The Effect of Titanium Surface Modifications on Dental Implant Osseointegration. , 2015, Frontiers of oral biology.

[2]  P. Layrolle,et al.  Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[3]  Marta Borowska,et al.  Evaluation of Dental Implant Stability Using Radiovisiographic Characterization and Texture Analysis , 2019, ITIB.

[4]  D A Tyndall,et al.  Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial radiology. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[5]  M. LANGARIZADEH,et al.  Improvement of digital mammogram images using histogram equalization, histogram stretching and median filter , 2011, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[6]  A. Urbanik,et al.  Caries detection enhancement using texture feature maps of intraoral radiographs , 2018, Oral Radiology.

[7]  D. Chappard,et al.  Texture analysis of computed tomographic images in osteoporotic patients with sinus lift bone graft reconstruction , 2012, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[8]  Marta Borowska,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Radiographic Textures Illustrating Healing Process After the Guided Bone Regeneration Surgery , 2018, ITIB.

[9]  Guillermo García,et al.  Evaluation of Texture for Classification of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm After Endovascular Repair , 2012, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[10]  P. Galindo,et al.  Multivariate study of factors influencing primary dental implant stability. , 2008, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  K. Osmola,et al.  Osseointegration of Dental Implants in Organ Transplant Patients Undergoing Chronic Immunosuppressive Therapy. , 2019, Implant dentistry.

[12]  Paulo Mazzoncini de Azevedo Marques,et al.  Intraoral radiographs texture analysis for dental implant planning , 2016, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[13]  Soon-Chul Choi,et al.  Fractal analysis of mandibular bony healing after orthognathic surgery. , 2002, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[14]  Su-Gwan Kim,et al.  Clinical study of the relationship between implant stability measurements using Periotest and Osstell mentor and bone quality assessment. , 2012, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[15]  Hamid Mohammed H Alghamdi Methods to Improve Osseointegration of Dental Implants in Low Quality (Type-IV) Bone: An Overview , 2018, Journal of functional biomaterials.

[16]  I. Aldhayan,et al.  Review on Dental Implantology , 2018 .

[17]  H. Buchanan,et al.  A qualitative study of patients' motivations and expectations for dental implants , 2013, BDJ.

[18]  M. R. Hilmi,et al.  GLCM TEXTURE ANALYSIS ON DIFFERENT COLOR SPACE FOR PTERYGIUM GRADING , 2015 .

[19]  D. Chappard,et al.  Texture analysis of X-ray radiographs of iliac bone is correlated with bone micro-CT , 2006, Osteoporosis International.

[20]  Lyndon F Cooper,et al.  Advancing dental implant surface technology--from micron- to nanotopography. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[21]  M. A. Imam,et al.  Can a total knee arthroplasty be both rotationally unconstrained and anteroposteriorly stabilised? , 2016, Bone & joint research.

[22]  Andrzej Materka,et al.  Quantitative description of 3D vascularity images: texture-based approach and its verification through cluster analysis , 2011, Pattern Analysis and Applications.

[23]  Vicky Goh,et al.  The precision of textural analysis in 18F-FDG-PET scans of oesophageal cancer , 2015, European Radiology.

[24]  Hariprasad Ananth,et al.  A Review on Biomaterials in Dental Implantology , 2015, International journal of biomedical science : IJBS.

[25]  Liang Li,et al.  A novel metal artifact reducing method for cone-beam CT based on three approximately orthogonal projections , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  R. Steenbakkers,et al.  The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping. , 2020, Radiology.

[27]  G. Collewet,et al.  Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[28]  H. Chun,et al.  Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. , 2002, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[29]  F. Kloss,et al.  Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration , 2016, BioMed research international.