Defining as a mathematical activity: A framework for characterizing progress from informal to more formal ways of reasoning

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to further the notion of defining as a mathematical activity by elaborating a framework that structures the role of defining in student progress from informal to more formal ways of reasoning. The framework is the result of a retrospective account of a significant learning experience that occurred in an undergraduate geometry course. The framework integrates the instructional design theory of Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) and distinctions between concept image and concept definition and offers other researchers and instructional designers a structured way to analyze or plan for the role of defining in students’ mathematical progress.

[1]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[2]  E. Fischbein,et al.  Defining in Classroom Activities , 1997 .

[3]  L. Streefland.  The design of a mathematics course. A theoretical reflection , 1993 .

[4]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms : perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design , 2000 .

[5]  Chris Rasmussen,et al.  Advancing Mathematical Activity: A Practice-Oriented View of Advanced Mathematical Thinking , 2005 .

[6]  Kpe Koeno Gravemeijer,et al.  A hypothetical learning trajectory on measurement and flexible arithmetic , 2003 .

[7]  O. Zaslavsky,et al.  Students' Conceptions of a Mathematical Definition , 2005 .

[8]  D. Henderson,et al.  Experiencing Geometry: On Plane and Sphere , 1995 .

[9]  Martin A. Simon.  Beyond inductive and deductive reasoning: The search for a sense of knowing , 1996 .

[10]  Tommy Dreyfus,et al.  IMAGES AND DEFINITIONS FOR THE CONCEPT OF FUNCTION , 1989 .

[11]  Chris Rasmussen,et al.  New directions in differential equations: A framework for interpreting students' understandings and difficulties , 2001 .

[12]  Michelle Zandieh,et al.  Proofs and refutations in the undergraduate mathematics classroom , 2008 .

[13]  Raffaella Borasi,et al.  Learning Mathematics Through Inquiry , 1994 .

[14]  Randall P. Dahlberg,et al.  Facilitating Learning Events Through Example Generation , 1997 .

[15]  I. Lakatos.  PROOFS AND REFUTATIONS (I)*† , 1963, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[16]  Chris Rasmussen,et al.  Didactising: Continuing the work of Leen Streefland , 2003 .

[17]  A. Sfard.  On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin , 1991 .

[18]  J. Dorier,et al.  On the Teaching of Linear Algebra , 2002 .

[19]  Shlomo Vinner,et al.  The Role of Definitions in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics , 2002 .

[20]  Robert C. Moore.  Making the transition to formal proof , 1994 .

[21]  H. Freudenthal.  Mathematics as an Educational Task , 1972 .

[22]  Carolyn A. Maher,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE IDEA OF MATHEMATICAL PROOF: A 5-YEAR CASE STUDY , 1996 .

[23]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Symbolizing, Modeling, and Instructional Design , 2000 .

[24]  H. Freudenthal.  Didactical Phenomenology of Mathematical Structures , 1983 .

[25]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Supporting Students' Development of Measuring Conceptions: Analyzing Students' Learning in Social Context , 2003 .

[26]  Anna Sierpinska.  On Some Aspects of Students’ Thinking in Linear Algebra , 2000 .

[27]  Leslie P. Steffe,et al.  Theories of Mathematical Learning , 1996 .

[28]  Kpe Koeno Gravemeijer.  How Emergent Models May Foster the Constitution of Formal Mathematics , 1999 .

[29]  Orit Zaslavsky,et al.  The many facets of a definition: The case of periodicity , 2003 .

[30]  Ed Dubinsky,et al.  The Concept of Function: Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy [MAA Notes, Volume 25] , 1992 .

[31]  Leslie P. Steffe,et al.  Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements , 2000 .

[32]  David Tall,et al.  Advanced Mathematical Thinking , 1994 .

[34]  E. Mary.  Educational Research Association , 1998 .