Collective action in the age of the internet: mass communication and online mobilization

This article examines how the Internet transforms collective action. Current practices on the web bear witness to thriving collective action ranging from persuasive to confrontational, individual to collective, undertakings. Even more influential than direct calls for action is the indirect mobilizing influence of the Internet's powers of mass communication, which is boosted by an antiauthoritarian ideology on the web. Theoretically, collective action through the otherwise socially isolating computer is possible because people rely on internalized group memberships and social identities to achieve social involvement. Empirical evidence from an online survey among environmental activists and nonactivists confirms that online action is considered an equivalent alternative to offline action by activists and nonactivists alike. However, the Internet may slightly alter the motives underlying collective action and thereby alter the nature of collective action and social movements. Perhaps more fundamental is the reverse influence that successful collective action will have on the nature and function of the Internet.

[1]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[2]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social Movement Participation in the Digital Age , 2002 .

[3]  T. Jordan Cyberpower: The culture and politics of cyberspace and the Internet , 1999 .

[4]  S. Wray,et al.  On electronic civil disobedience , 1999 .

[5]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  The information age: Economy, society and culture. , 1998 .

[6]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? , 1998 .

[7]  B. Simon,et al.  Collective identification and social movement participation. , 1998 .

[8]  Jacquelien van Stekelenburg,et al.  The social psychology of protest , 1997 .

[9]  M. Castells Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1996 .

[10]  Caroline Kelly,et al.  Identity and injustice: Exploring women's participation in collective action , 1995 .

[11]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .

[12]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  Russell Spears,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, DEINDIVIDUATION AND GROUP DECISION-MAKING , 1991 .

[14]  Russell Spears,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication, De-Individuation and Group Decision-Making , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[15]  T. Connolly,et al.  Toward Atheory of Automated Group Work , 1990 .

[16]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[17]  G. Salton,et al.  The network nation , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[18]  Tom Postmes,et al.  When are net effects gross products? The power of influence and the influence of power in computer-mediated communication. , 2002 .

[19]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? Side-Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication. , 2002 .

[20]  Manuel Castells,et al.  The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1999 .

[21]  T. Postmes,et al.  A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena , 1995 .

[22]  R. Spears,et al.  Social influence and the influence of the 'social' in computer-mediated communication. , 1992 .

[23]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group : from acceptance to collective protest , 1990 .