Towards a common framework for knowledge co-creation: opportunities for collaborationbetween Service Science and Sustainability Science

Purpose Sustainability and Sustainable Development should be the top priorities of a Smarter Planet. On the basis of this statement, our aim is to highlight opportunities of knowledge co-creation that derive from the integration of the research efforts of two communities of scientists, scholars and professionals, recognized worldwide that share a common vision of a smarter and more sustainable planet: Service Science and Sustainability Science. Design/Methodology/approach By adopting a systems thinking view, and specifically the Viable Systems Approach (VSA), the paper analyses the scientific positioning of Service Science and Sustainability Science, and, through a Service-Dominant Logic co-creation approach, seeks commonalities that can highlight opportunities of fruitful scientific collaboration. Findings The paper evidences significant convergence in the views and scientific positioning of Service Science and Sustainability Science, clarifying why the two communities should collaborate by integrating knowledge resources and sharing advances. By promoting a boundary crossing interaction and creating interface connections within and between the two scientific communities, gaps can be removed and relevant bridging elements explored and exploited in a shared effort targeted to realizing a smarter and more sustainable world. The common interand transdisciplinary as well as solution-oriented research approach appears a key methodological element of convergence for developing a shared framework of reference coherently. A “3Pillars”Knowledge Co-creation Framework for Service & Sustainability Science integrates the findings of our 3-step interpretative pathway, into a consistent whole, a key to creating convergence in multidisciplinary knowledge co-creation contexts. This framework proposes an original vision of sustainability which integrates the Triple Helix and the Triple Bottom Line models into a co-creation framework to support knowledge design and creation processes through which University-Industry-Government collaboration, necessary to address the challenge of a smarter and sustainable world, can be tried, tested and further developed. Research implications The paper opens up new research pathways launching a Science-led call for collaboration that overcomes the traditional divide between knowledge domains and communities fostering a shared effort to address the challenges of sustainability within a smarter planet and to put into practice interdisciplinary collaboration in order to develop a common framework for Service and Sustainability Sciences. Practical implications The paper provides insights for rethinking research, development and management approaches as well as education programs by placing sustainability at the center of the scientific, governmental and business agendas. It also sheds light on the criticalities and barriers of mutual learning systems. Originality/value The paper develops an original analytical approach that integrates the Triple Helix and the Triple Bottom Line models into a coherent co-creation framework for sustainability in which Service Science and Sustainability Science play key roles by integrating their knowledge resources.

[1]  G. Briefs Business cycles , 1949 .

[2]  A. Goldberg General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. , 1969 .

[3]  Stanley H. Cohen,et al.  Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. , 1975 .

[4]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Enterprises from science: The origins of science-based regional economic development , 1993 .

[5]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[6]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[7]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[8]  Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al.  Utricularia's secret: the advantage of positive feedback in oligotrophic environments , 1995 .

[9]  S. Dovers Sustainability: Demands on Policy , 1996, Journal of Public Policy.

[10]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[11]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[12]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.

[13]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the PostNormal Age , 2001 .

[14]  E. Gummesson Relationship Marketing in the New Economy , 2002 .

[15]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations , 2002, Ambio.

[16]  Paul Hildreth,et al.  The duality of knowledge , 2002, Inf. Res..

[17]  W. Clark,et al.  Sustainability science: The emerging research program , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  R. Kasperson,et al.  A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Can ‘the public’ be considered as a fourth helix in university-industry-government relations? Report on the Fourth Triple Helix Conference, 2002 , 2003 .

[21]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[22]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  The Service-dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions , 2006 .

[23]  K. Takeuchi,et al.  Sustainability science: building a new discipline , 2006 .

[24]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic , 2007 .

[25]  F. Biermann Earth system governance as a crosscutting theme of global change research , 2007 .

[26]  Pim Martens,et al.  Community Essay: Sustainability: Science or Fiction? , 2006 .

[27]  Sigrid Stagl,et al.  See Blockindiscussions, Blockinstats, Blockinand Blockinauthor Blockinprofiles Blockinfor Blockinthis Blockinpublication Managing Blockincomplex Blockinadaptive Blockinsystems Blockin— Blockina Blockinco- Evolutionary Blockinperspective Blockinon Blockinnatural Blockinresource Management , 2022 .

[28]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Steps Toward a Science of Service Systems , 2007, Computer.

[29]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  Service Science , 2007, Journal of Grid Computing.

[30]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution , 2008 .

[31]  P. Maglio,et al.  The Emergence of Service Science: Toward Systematic Service Innovations to Accelerate Co‐Creation of Value , 2008 .

[32]  Steve Evans,et al.  Succeeding through service innovation : a service perspective for education, research, business and government , 2008 .

[33]  B. Frame,et al.  ‘Wicked’, ‘Messy’, and ‘Clumsy’: Long-Term Frameworks for Sustainability , 2008 .

[34]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Fundamentals of service science , 2008 .

[35]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Introduction to special issue Building the entrepreneurial university: a global perspective , 2008 .

[36]  E. Gummesson Extending the service-dominant logic: from customer centricity to balanced centricity , 2008 .

[37]  Benjamin Schneider,et al.  Modeling the Human Side of Service Delivery , 2009 .

[38]  E. Ostrom A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems , 2009, Science.

[39]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  The service system is the basic abstraction of service science , 2009, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[40]  Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al.  Options for Managing a Systemic Bank Crisis , 2009 .

[41]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-Dominant Logic as a Foundation for Service Science: Clarifications , 2009 .

[42]  A. J. Woodhill,et al.  Governance for sustainability , 2009 .

[43]  Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al.  Quantifying economic sustainability: Implications for free-enterprise theory, policy and practice , 2009 .

[44]  Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al.  Quantifying sustainability: Resilience, efficiency and the return of information theory , 2009 .

[45]  William F. Christopher From System Science --A New Way to Structure and Manage the Company for Sustainable Success , 2010 .

[46]  Cheng Hsu,et al.  How Hyper-Network Analysis Helps Understand Human Networks? , 2010 .

[47]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service, value networks and learning , 2010 .

[48]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic , 2010, The Routledge Handbook of Service Research Insights and Ideas.

[49]  J. Harris,et al.  Tackling Wicked Problems: Through the Transdisciplinary Imagination , 2010 .

[50]  M. Gorman Trading zones, Normative Scenarios, and Service Science , 2010 .

[51]  Clara Bassano,et al.  A VSA-SS Approach to Healthcare Service Systems: The Triple Target of Efficiency, Effectiveness and Sustainability , 2010 .

[52]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  S3-Sustainability and Services Science: Novel Perspective and Challenge , 2010 .

[53]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  The Cambridge-IBM SSME White Paper Revisited , 2010 .

[54]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Evolution and structure of sustainability science , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Better Place: A Case Study of the Reciprocal Relations Between Sustainability and Service , 2011 .

[56]  Sergio Barile,et al.  Enhancement, Value and Viability of Cultural Heritage: Towards a Service-Based Systems Approach , 2011 .

[57]  J. Ahern From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world , 2011 .

[58]  Rahul C. Basole,et al.  Value Transformation in the Mobile Service Ecosystem: A Study of App Store Emergence and Growth , 2012 .

[59]  J. Gál,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS, EFFICIENCY AND SUSTAINABILITY IN LOCAL RURAL DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS , 2012 .

[60]  E. Carayannis,et al.  The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation , 2012 .

[61]  Masaru Yarime,et al.  Governance for sustainability: knowledge integration and multi-actor dimensions in risk management , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[62]  Pim Martens,et al.  Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[63]  Francesco Polese,et al.  An Introduction to the Viable Systems Approach and its Contribution to Marketing , 2012 .

[64]  Giancarlo Nota,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of a 'T-Shaped' Knowledge: From Individuals to Cooperating Communities of Practice , 2012 .

[65]  N. Frantzeskaki,et al.  Establishing sustainability science in higher education institutions: towards an integration of academic development, institutionalization, and stakeholder collaborations , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[66]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society , 2013 .

[67]  Francesco Caputo,et al.  From ‘Ego’ to ‘Eco’ in B2B Relationships , 2013 .

[68]  W. Mauser,et al.  Transdisciplinary global change research: The co-creation of knowledge for sustainability , 2013 .

[69]  Marialuisa Saviano,et al.  Managerial Choices between Systems, Knowledge and Viability , 2013 .

[70]  U. Pisano The international SD agenda and its impact on Europe , 2014 .

[71]  Sergio Barile,et al.  Service economy, knowledge, and the need for T-shaped innovators , 2014, World Wide Web.

[72]  Steven B. Kraines,et al.  Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability , 2014 .

[73]  Mario Calabrese,et al.  The viable systems approach and its contribution to the analysis of sustainable business behaviors , 2014 .

[74]  M. Saviano,et al.  Resource integration and value co-creation in cultural heritage management , 2014 .

[75]  A. Wolfson,et al.  Sustainability through Service: Perspectives, Concepts and Examples , 2014 .

[76]  Francesco Caputo,et al.  Health care as a worldwide concern. Insights on the Italian and Indian health care systems and PPPs from a VSA perspective , 2014 .

[77]  F. Farioli,et al.  Natural powers: from the bio-economy to the eco-economy and sustainable place-making , 2015, Sustainability Science.

[78]  Sergio Barile,et al.  Towards a Novel Conception of Bene Culturale , 2015 .

[79]  M. Saviano,et al.  From the management of cultural heritage to the governance of the cultural heritage system , 2015 .

[80]  Shlomo Mark,et al.  Sustainability through Service , 2015 .

[81]  P. Maglio,et al.  Commentary—Toward a Research Agenda for Human-Centered Service System Innovation , 2015 .

[82]  Marlen Arnold,et al.  Fostering sustainability by linking co-creation and relationship management concepts , 2017 .