An interactive land use transition agent-based model (ILUTABM): Endogenizing human-environment interactions in the Western Missisquoi Watershed

Abstract Forest Transition Theory (FTT) suggests that reforestation may follow deforestation as a result of and interplay between changing social, economic and ecological conditions. We develop a simplistic but empirically data driven land use transition agent-based modeling platform, interactive land use transition agent-based model (ILUTABM), that is able to reproduce the observed land use patterns and link the forest transition to parcel-level heuristic-based land use decisions and ecosystem service (ES). The ILUTABM endogenously links landowners’ land use decisions with ecosystem services (ES) provided by the lands by treating both lands and landowners as interacting agents. The ILUTABM simulates both the land use changes resulting from farmers’ decision behaviors as well as the recursive effects of changing land uses on farmers’ decision behaviors. The ILUTABM is calibrated and validated at 30 m × 30 m spatial resolution using National Land Cover Data (NLCD) 1992, 2001 and 2006 across the western Missisquoi watershed, which is located in the north-eastern US with an estimated area of 283 square kilometers and 312 farmers farming on 16% of the total Missisquoi watershed area. This study hypothesizes that farmers’ land use decisions are made primarily based on their summed expected utilities and that impacts of exogenous socio-economic factors, such as natural disasters, public policies and institutional/social reforms, on farmers’ expected utilities can significantly influence the land use transitions between agricultural and forested lands. Monte Carlo experiments under six various socio-economic conditions combined with different ES valuation schemes are used to assess the sensitivities of the ILUTABM. Goodness-of-fit measures confirm that the ILUTABM is able to reproduce 62% of the observed land use transitions. However, the spatial patterns of the observed land used transitions are more clustered than the simulated counterparts. We find that, when farmers value food provisioning Ecosystem Services (ES) more than other ES (e.g., soil and water regulation), deforestation is observed. However, when farmers value less food provisioning than other ES or they value food provisioning and other ES equally, the forest transition is observed. The ILUTABM advances the Forest Transition Theory (FTT) framework by endogenizing the interactions of socio-ecological feedbacks and socio-economic factors in a generalizable model that can be calibrated with empirical data.

[1]  G. Daily,et al.  Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services , 2011 .

[2]  T. Rudel,et al.  Modeling the forest transition: forest scarcity and ecosystem service hypotheses. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[3]  Jeroen M. Schoorl,et al.  Evaluating choices in multi-process landscape evolution models , 2011 .

[4]  William T. Scherer,et al.  The triangular density to approximate the normal density: decision rules-of-thumb , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  P. Hostert,et al.  Is there a forest transition outside forests? Trajectories of farm trees and effects on ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape in Eastern Germany , 2012 .

[6]  T. Groen,et al.  Contemporary land use/land cover types determine soil organic carbon stocks in south-west Rwanda , 2014, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[7]  E. Lambin,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity , 2011 .

[8]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Coping with Complexity: The Adaptive Value of Changing Utility , 1984 .

[9]  L. An,et al.  Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems : Review of agent-based models , 2012 .

[10]  Zhanli Sun,et al.  Analyzing the drivers of tree planting in Yunnan, China, with Bayesian networks , 2014 .

[11]  George Casella,et al.  Predictive distributions in risk analysis and estimation for the triangular distribution , 2001 .

[12]  R. D. Groot,et al.  The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes , 2010 .

[13]  Mathieu Rouget,et al.  Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. , 2007 .

[14]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[15]  Andreas Gensior,et al.  Temporal dynamics of soil organic carbon after land‐use change in the temperate zone – carbon response functions as a model approach , 2011 .

[16]  D. Tilman,et al.  The Importance of Land-Use Legacies to Ecology and Conservation , 2003 .

[17]  Steven M. Manson,et al.  Agent-based modeling and genetic programming for modeling land change in the Southern Yucatán Peninsular Region of Mexico , 2005 .

[18]  Quang Bao Le,et al.  Land Use Dynamic Simulator (LUDAS): A multi-agent system model for simulating spatio-temporal dynamics of coupled human-landscape system: 2. Scenario-based application for impact assessment of land-use policies , 2010, Ecol. Informatics.

[19]  R. McCuen,et al.  Evaluation of the Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency Index , 2006 .

[20]  M. A. A. Cox.  Which is the appropriate triangular distribution to employ in the modified analytic hierarchy process , 2012 .

[21]  Galo Canizares.  A History , 2018, Thresholds.

[22]  D. Zachary.  Land cover change using an energy transition paradigm in a statistical mechanics approach , 2013 .

[23]  A. Leone,et al.  Land Use, Climate and Transport of Nutrients: Evidence Emerging from the Lake Vicocase Study , 2013, Environmental Management.

[24]  Tarin Paz-Kagan,et al.  Evaluation of ecosystem responses to land-use change using soil quality and primary productivity in a semi-arid area, Israel , 2014 .

[25]  S. Hinz,et al.  Process analysis in the coastal zone of Bénin through remote sensing and socio-economic surveys , 2012 .

[26]  A. Michaud,et al.  Cropping, soil type and manure application effects on phosphorus export and bioavailability , 2004 .

[27]  Wenjie Sun,et al.  Spatially explicit experiments for the exploration of land‐use decision‐making dynamics , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[28]  E. Lambin,et al.  Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change , 2010 .

[29]  K. Seto,et al.  Advancing Land Change Modeling: Opportunities and Research Requirements , 2013 .

[30]  Anik Schneiders,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem services. Complementary approaches for ecosystem management , 2012 .

[31]  Shuguang Liu,et al.  Identifying potential areas for biofuel production and evaluating the environmental effects: a case study of the James River Basin in the Midwestern United States , 2012 .

[32]  B. Wemple,et al.  Soil nitrification in a large forested watershed, Ranch Brook (Vermont), mirrors patterns in smaller northeastern USA catchments , 2011 .

[33]  Martin Zeman,et al.  Land-use and land-cover changes in rural areas during different political systems: A case study of Slovakia from 1782 to 2006 , 2014 .

[34]  K. Gaston,et al.  Land-cover effects on soil organic carbon stocks in a European city. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[35]  John H. Miller,et al.  Complex adaptive systems - an introduction to computational models of social life , 2009, Princeton studies in complexity.

[36]  Ahindra Ghosh,et al.  Ecosystems and Human Well-Being , 2011 .

[37]  Dawn Cassandra Parker,et al.  Spatial agent-based models for socio-ecological systems: Challenges and prospects , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[38]  Gu Lb,et al.  Soil carbon stocks and land use change : a meta analysis , 2022 .

[39]  J. Gareth Polhill,et al.  Agent-based land-use models: a review of applications , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[40]  Tamie L. Veith,et al.  Determination of Critical Source Areas for Phosphorus Loss: Lake Champlain Basin, Vermont , 2010 .

[41]  T. Plieninger,et al.  Land-use legacies in the forest structure of silvopastoral oak woodlands in the Eastern Mediterranean , 2011 .

[42]  James M. Gibbons,et al.  Modelling uncertainty in greenhouse gas emissions from UK agriculture at the farm level , 2006 .

[43]  M. Wimberly,et al.  Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grasslands and wetlands , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Revisiting the forest transition theory with historical records and geospatial data: A case study from Mississippi (USA) , 2013 .

[45]  Hugh Kelley,et al.  Assessing the transition from deforestation to forest regrowth with an agent-based model of land cover change for south-central Indiana (USA) , 2008 .

[46]  Tom Evans,et al.  Agent-based modeling of deforestation in southern Yucatán, Mexico, and reforestation in the Midwest United States , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  R. Hirsch,et al.  Use of flow-normalization to evaluate nutrient concentration and flux changes in Lake Champlain tributaries, 1990–2009 , 2012 .

[48]  Charles M. Macal,et al.  Managing Business Complexity: Discovering Strategic Solutions with Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation , 2007 .

[49]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  Land use and biodiversity relationships , 2009 .

[50]  M. Clark,et al.  Asymmetric forest transition driven by the interaction of socioeconomic development and environmental heterogeneity in Central America , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change , 2005 .

[52]  V. Uddameri,et al.  Assessing the effect of initial vapor-phase concentrations on inhalation risks of disinfection-by-products (DBP) in multi-use shower facilities , 2013, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[53]  Hugh Kelley,et al.  Multi-scale analysis of a household level agent-based model of landcover change. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[54]  F. Müller,et al.  Socioeconomic influences on biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being: a quantitative application of the DPSIR model in Jiangsu, China. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[55]  J. Eheart,et al.  An agent‐based model of farmer decision‐making and water quality impacts at the watershed scale under markets for carbon allowances and a second‐generation biofuel crop , 2011 .

[56]  Maria Luisa Paracchini,et al.  Land-cover change dynamics and insights into ecosystem services in European stream riparian zones , 2014 .

[57]  E. Veldkamp,et al.  Geographic bias of field observations of soil carbon stocks with tropical land-use changes precludes spatial extrapolation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Elisabeth Huber-Sannwald,et al.  Landscape diversity in a rural territory: Emerging land use mosaics coupled to livelihood diversification , 2013 .

[59]  Matthew A. Bowker,et al.  Biological crusts as a model system for examining the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship in soils , 2010 .

[60]  S. Zerbe,et al.  What plant traits tell us: Consequences of land-use change of a traditional agro-forest system on biodiversity and ecosystem service provision , 2014 .

[61]  R. Gifford,et al.  Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis , 2002 .

[62]  M. Janssen,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review , 2003 .

[63]  G. Meehl,et al.  The Importance of Land-Cover Change in Simulating Future Climates , 2005, Science.

[64]  William Rand,et al.  Spatial process and data models: Toward integration of agent-based models and GIS , 2005, J. Geogr. Syst..

[65]  John R. Hendrickson,et al.  Challenges for maintaining sustainable agricultural systems in the United States , 2008, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

[66]  Alexey A. Voinov,et al.  Effectiveness of a participatory modeling effort to identify and advance community water resource goals in St. Albans, Vermont , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[67]  J. Schoorl,et al.  Modelling interactions and feedback mechanisms between land use change and landscape processes , 2009 .

[68]  Quang Bao Le,et al.  Land-Use Dynamic Simulator (LUDAS): A multi-agent system model for simulating spatio-temporal dynamics of coupled human-landscape system. I. Structure and theoretical specification , 2008, Ecol. Informatics.

[69]  Monte Carlo analysis of the U.S. EPA model of human exposure to cadmium in sewage sludge through consumption of garden crops. , 1993, Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology.

[70]  Axel Don,et al.  Sensitivity of soil organic carbon stocks and fractions to different land-use changes across Europe , 2013 .

[71]  Matt J. Aitkenhead,et al.  Agricultural census data and land use modelling , 2006, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[72]  Paul M. Torrens,et al.  Agent-based Models and the Spatial Sciences , 2010 .

[73]  Quyet Manh Vu,et al.  Socio-economic and biophysical determinants of land degradation in Vietnam: An integrated causal analysis at the national level , 2014 .

[74]  Effect of land-use conversion from forest to cocoa agroforest on soil characteristics and quality of a Ferric Lixisol in lowland humid Ghana , 2014, Agroforestry Systems.

[75]  J. Allan.  Landscapes and Riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems , 2004 .

[76]  A. McMichael,et al.  Ecosystems and Human well-being , 2003 .

[77]  J. Compton,et al.  LONG‐TERM IMPACTS OF AGRICULTURE ON SOIL CARBON AND NITROGEN IN NEW ENGLAND FORESTS , 2000 .

[78]  N. Gratiot,et al.  Sediment dynamics during the rainy season in tropical highland catchments of central Mexico using fallout radionuclides , 2010 .

[79]  Andreas Neef,et al.  Building on qualitative datasets and participatory processes to simulate land use change in a mountain watershed of Northwest Vietnam , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[80]  Rin Won Joo,et al.  Forest transition in South Korea: reality, path and drivers , 2012 .

[81]  H. Wehrden,et al.  Multifunctionality and biodiversity: Ecosystem services in temperate rainforests of the Pacific Northwest, USA , 2014 .

[82]  James Brasington,et al.  Coupling agent-based models of subsistence farming with individual-based forest models and dynamic models of water distribution , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[83]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making , 2010 .