Detector Relative Efficiencies in the Presence of Laplace Noise

The closed-form solution for Neyman-Pearson optimal detectorperformance for Laplace noise affords a rare opportunity for smalland intermediate sample relative efficiency studies. Indeed, the Laplace noise solution is the only known closed-form description fora non-Gaussian optimal detector of the type considered. Weillustrate numerically that, for stringent detector requirements,convergence of detector relative efficiencies to the correspondingasymptotic values can be quite slow. Three types of asymptoticefficiencies are considered in this comparison of the optimal, linear,and sign detectors.

[1]  W. J. Dixon,et al.  Power Under Normality of Several Nonparametric Tests , 1954 .

[2]  Feller William,et al.  An Introduction To Probability Theory And Its Applications , 1950 .

[3]  G. L. Wise,et al.  A Detection Scheme for Dependent Noise Processes , 1980 .

[4]  J. L. Hodges,et al.  The Efficiency of Some Nonparametric Competitors of the t-Test , 1956 .

[5]  J. Klotz Small Sample Power and Efficiency for the One Sample Wilcoxon and Normal Scores Tests , 1963 .

[6]  W. J. Dixon,et al.  Power Functions of the Sign Test and Power Efficiency for Normal Alternatives , 1953 .

[7]  Gary L. Wise,et al.  Approximately optimal memoryless detection of random signals in dependent noise , 1984, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[8]  M. Kanefsky,et al.  Introduction to nonparametric detection with applications , 1977, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[9]  J. Miller,et al.  The Detection of Signals in Impulsive Noise Modeled as a Mixture Process , 1976, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[10]  J. Miller,et al.  Numerical Results on the Convergence of Relative Efficiencies , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[11]  J. Thomas Nonparametric detection , 1970 .

[12]  H. J. Arnold Small Sample Power of the One Sample Wilcoxon Test for Non-Normal Shift Alternatives , 1965 .

[13]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  A Relative Efficiency study of Some Popular Detectors , 1982 .

[14]  Gary L. Wise,et al.  Asymptotic memoryless detection of random signals in dependent noise , 1981 .

[15]  John B. Thomas,et al.  Detectors for discrete-time signals in non-Gaussian noise , 1972, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[16]  Gary L. Wise,et al.  Asymptotic memoryless discrete-time detection of phi-mixing signals in phi-mixing noise , 1984, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  H. Chernoff A Measure of Asymptotic Efficiency for Tests of a Hypothesis Based on the sum of Observations , 1952 .

[18]  Sawasd Tantaratana,et al.  Relative efficiency of the sequential probability ratio test in signal detection , 1978, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[19]  R. Marks,et al.  Detection in Laplace Noise , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[20]  Rockwell Internationar Detection InLaplace Noise , 1978 .

[21]  C. Blyth,et al.  Note on Relative Efficiency of Tests , 1958 .

[22]  D. Halverson,et al.  Discrete-time detection in Epsilon -mixing noise , 1980, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[23]  John B. Thomas,et al.  On nonparametric signal detectors , 1964, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[24]  J. Klotz Alternative Efficiencies for Signed Rank Tests , 1965 .

[25]  Peter F. Swaszek,et al.  Locally optimal detection in multivariate non-Gaussian noise , 1984, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[26]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Probability, random variables and stochastic processes , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..