Measuring image texture to separate "difficult" from "easy" mammograms.

We are investigating computerized techniques for sorting mammograms according to whether the breast tissue is fatty or dense. The hypothesis is that areas of dense tissue are a major factor in making certain mammograms harder for both radiologists and computers to interpret. Being able to identify dense mammograms automatically could permit better use of the time and skills of expert radiologists by allowing the difficult mammograms to be examined by the most experienced readers. In addition, the scope for computer-aided detection of abnormalities might be increased by concentrating on the easier, fatty mammograms. The mammograms used in the experiment were classified independently by two radiologists, who agreed in almost all cases. A number of local statistical and texture measures were then computed for patches from digitizations of these mammograms. One of the measures (local skewness in tiles) gives a good separation between fatty and dense patches. This measure has been incorporated into an automated procedure that separates off approximately two thirds of the fatty mammograms. This finding has been replicated on mammograms taken from a UK screening programme. The relationship between the fatty/dense distinction and the classification proposed by Wolfe is discussed.

[1]  F. Winsberg,et al.  Detection of Radiographic Abnormalities in Mammograms by Means of Optical Scanning and Computer Analysis , 1967 .

[2]  J. Wolfe Breast parenchymal patterns and their changes with age. , 1976, Radiology.

[3]  J. Wolfe Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern , 1976, Cancer.

[4]  S. Feig,et al.  Analysis of clinically occult and mammographically occult breast tumors. , 1977, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  L. Tabár,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns. Risk indicator for breast cancer? , 1982, JAMA.

[6]  A. Shadagopan,et al.  Computerized quantification of breast duct patterns. , 1982, Radiology.

[7]  R. Gordon,et al.  Enhancement of Mammographic Features by Optimal Adaptive Neighborhood Image Processing , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Isabelle E. Magnin,et al.  Mammographic Texture Analysis: An Evaluation Of Risk For Developing Breast Cancer , 1986 .

[9]  K. Doi,et al.  Computer-aided detection of microcalcifications in mammograms. Methodology and preliminary clinical study. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[10]  Bahaa W. Fam,et al.  The Detection Of Calcification Clusters In Film-Screen Mammograms; A Detailed Algorithmic Approach , 1988, Medical Imaging.

[11]  David R. Dance,et al.  Automatic Detection Of Microcalcifications In Digital Mammograms Using Local Area Thresholding Techniques , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[12]  Martin J. Yaffe,et al.  Characterization Of Mammographic Parenchymal Pattern By Fractal Dimension , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[13]  I. E. Magnin,et al.  Automatic Microcalcifications Pattern Recognition From X-Ray Mammographies , 1989, Other Conferences.

[14]  T K Lau,et al.  Automated detection of breast tumors using the asymmetry approach. , 1991, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[15]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images. , 1991, Medical physics.

[16]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Classification of breast tissue by texture analysis , 1992, Image Vis. Comput..

[17]  J. Law Improved image quality for dense breasts in mammography. , 1992, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Stochastic model for automated detection of calcifications in digital mammograms , 1992, Image Vis. Comput..