What we call what we do affects how we do it: a new nomenclature for simulation research in medical education

Rapid technological advances and concern for patient safety have increased the focus on simulation as a pedagogical tool for educating health care providers. To date, simulation research scholarship has focused on two areas; evaluating instructional designs of simulation programs, and the integration of simulation into a broader educational context. However, these two categories of research currently exist under a single label—Simulation-Based Medical Education. In this paper we argue that introducing a more refined nomenclature within which to frame simulation research is necessary for researchers, to appropriately design research studies and describe their findings, and for end-point users (such as program directors and educators), to more appropriately understand and utilize this evidence.

[1]  Matthew B Weinger,et al.  The Pharmacology of Simulation: A Conceptual Framework to Inform Progress in Simulation Research , 2010, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[2]  David A Cook,et al.  One drop at a time: research to advance the science of simulation. , 2010, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[3]  B. K. Forscher,et al.  Chaos in the Brickyard. , 1963, Science.

[4]  Judith T. Sowder Setting a research agenda , 1989 .

[5]  Kathryn Parker,et al.  Rethinking programme evaluation in health professions education: beyond ‘did it work?’ , 2013, Medical education.

[6]  W. McGaghie,et al.  A critical review of simulation‐based medical education research: 2003–2009 , 2010, Medical education.

[7]  M. Roizen,et al.  Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2012 .

[8]  John Rice,et al.  A Path to Better Healthcare Simulation Systems: Leveraging the Integrated Systems Design Approach , 2011, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[9]  S. Issenberg,et al.  The First Research Consensus Summit of the Society for Simulation In Healthcare: Conduction and a Synthesis of the Results , 2011, Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[10]  Debra Nestel,et al.  Simulation for Learning and Teaching Procedural Skills: The State of the Science , 2011, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[11]  R. Glavin,et al.  Skills, Training, and Education , 2011, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[12]  S Barry Issenberg,et al.  The scope of simulation-based healthcare education. , 2006, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[13]  B. Pinyerd,et al.  Setting a Research Agenda to Promote Nursing Research , 1993, Clinical nursing research.

[14]  Donald L. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Evaluating Training Programs : The Four Levels , 2009 .

[15]  R. Reznick,et al.  Teaching surgical skills--changes in the wind. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  J. Bligh,et al.  Distributing menus to hungry learners: can learning by simulation become simulation of learning? , 2006, Medical teacher.

[17]  A. Dubrowski,et al.  Performance vs. learning curves: what is motor learning and how is it measured? , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[18]  Raj Aggarwal,et al.  Nontechnical skills: an inaccurate and unhelpful descriptor? , 2011, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[19]  Michael Molenda,et al.  In Search of the Elusive ADDIE Model , 2003 .

[20]  William C McGaghie,et al.  Effect of practice on standardised learning outcomes in simulation‐based medical education , 2006, Medical education.

[21]  A. Ziv,et al.  Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. , 2006, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[22]  A. Ziv,et al.  Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review , 2005, Medical teacher.

[23]  D. Gaba Training and nontechnical skills: the politics of terminology. , 2011, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[24]  H. Schmidt,et al.  Description, justification and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education , 2008, Medical education.

[25]  David A Cook,et al.  Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, JAMA.

[26]  Jonathan Stacks,et al.  Developmental Evaluation , 2011, Health promotion practice.

[27]  Jason H. Szostek,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: Systematic review and meta-analysis , 2013, Medical teacher.

[28]  J. Avery Critical review. , 2006, The Journal of the Arkansas Medical Society.

[29]  Charlotte Ringsted,et al.  Setting a research agenda for simulation-based healthcare education: a synthesis of the outcome from an Utstein style meeting. , 2011, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[30]  D. Nestel,et al.  Simulation-based medical education , 2013 .