Life cycle energy consumption and CO2 emission of an office building in China

PurposeBuilding is one of the main factors of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Reducing energy consumption and carbon dioxide (CO2) emission from building is urgent for environmental protection and sustainable development. The objective of this study is to develop a life cycle assessment (LCA) model for an office building in China to assess its energy consumption and CO2 emission, determine the whole life cycle phases, and the significant environmental aspects that contribute most to the impact.MethodsA process-based LCA has been used to identify and quantify the energy consumption and CO2 emission of the office building. The LCA is conducted in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency, The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, and the International Organization for Standardization standards for life cycle assessments. The entire life cycle including building materials production, construction, operation, and demolition of the building is studied. A service life of 50 years is assumed and the major construction materials such as concrete, cement, brick, steel, timber, glass, and plastic are selected for the building.Results and discussionThe results show that building operation uses the largest share of energy and contributes most to CO2 emission. The cooling and heating system in building operation strongly influence the energy consumption and CO2 emission of the building. In addition, the large quantity use of concrete and steel in materials production, and the treatment of end-of-life building materials are also the important aspects impacting the environmental performance of the building. Based on the results of the study, some environmental improvements aiming at reducing energy consumption and CO2 emission throughout the life cycle of the building are provided.ConclusionsThis study provides an LCA of the energy consumption and CO2 emission of a typical office building in China. It determines the whole life cycle phases that contribute most to the impact and defines the significant environmental aspects of the building. This study also shows the importance of using a life cycle perspective when evaluating energy consumption and CO2 emission of building and also lays the groundwork for LCA studying of other office buildings in China.

[1]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  A low energy building in a life cycle - its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential , 2002 .

[2]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications , 2003 .

[3]  P. van der Lugt,et al.  Bamboo as a building material alternative for Western Europe? A study of the environmental performance, costs and bottlenecks of the use of bamboo (products) in Western Europe , 2003 .

[4]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  ISO 14041: Environmental management — life cycle assessment — goal and scope definition — inventory analysis , 1998 .

[5]  Hatice Sözer,et al.  Improving energy efficiency through the design of the building envelope , 2010 .

[6]  S. Citherlet,et al.  Energy and environmental comparison of three variants of a family house during its whole life span , 2007 .

[7]  D W Pennington,et al.  Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications , 2004 .

[8]  Dennis Postlethwaite,et al.  Development of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) , 1994, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[9]  Hugo Hens,et al.  Life cycle optimization of extremely low energy buildings , 2007 .

[10]  Jun Li,et al.  Managing carbon emissions in China through building energy efficiency. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  Seppo Junnila.  Life cycle assessment of environmentally significant aspects of an office building , 2004 .

[12]  Said Jalali,et al.  Life cycle assessment of steel and reinforced concrete structure: a new analysis tool , 2007 .

[13]  Wang Jing.  Life Cycle Assessment Energy Consumption and Pollutant Emission Inventory Analysis of Construction Materials Production , 2007 .

[14]  Gerd Wegener,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Wood Floor Coverings - A Representative Study for the German Flooring Industry (11 pp) , 2006 .

[15]  Li Zhaojian.  Calculation Analysis of Life Cycle Energy Consumption of Plastic Materials , 2006 .

[16]  Xiaomin Yang,et al.  BEPAS—a life cycle building environmental performance assessment model , 2006 .

[17]  W. Cai,et al.  China building energy consumption: Situation, challenges and corresponding measures , 2009 .

[18]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Embodied energy in buildings : wood versus concrete - reply to Börjesson and Gustavsson , 2002 .

[19]  J. Sanjayan,et al.  Green house gas emissions due to concrete manufacture , 2007 .

[20]  Giuseppe Tassielli,et al.  Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of flooring materials: ceramic versus marble tiles , 2002 .

[21]  Karin Adalberth,et al.  Energy Use and Environmental Impact of New Residential Buildings , 2000 .

[22]  Marco Sala,et al.  Energy efficient office refurbishment , 2001 .

[23]  Wang Yanjia,et al.  The Chinese nonferrous metals industry—energy use and CO2 emissions , 2010 .

[24]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of an eight-storey wood-framed apartment building , 2010 .

[25]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[26]  Kang Yanbing,et al.  Analysis of the impacts of building energy efficiency policies and technical improvements on China's future energy demand , 2005 .

[27]  Zhang Xu.  Model Improvement of Inventory Analysis on Energy Upstream Phase Based on Life Cycle Assessment , 2009 .

[28]  Anne-Marie Tillman,et al.  LCA of building frame structures : environmetal impact over the life cycle of wooden and concrete frames , 1997 .

[29]  Robert Ries,et al.  Life cycle assessment of residential heating and cooling systems in four regions in the United States , 2008 .

[30]  Zhuguo Li.  A new life cycle impact assessment approach for buildings , 2006 .

[31]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  Relevance of simplifications in LCA of building components , 2009 .

[32]  Yongchen Song,et al.  Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emission over 1991-2006 in China , 2009 .

[33]  Matjaz Prek,et al.  Environmental impact and life cycle assessment of heating and air conditioning systems, a simplified case study , 2004 .

[34]  Gian Andrea Blengini,et al.  Energy-saving policies and low-energy residential buildings: an LCA case study to support decision makers in Piedmont (Italy) , 2010 .

[35]  Jun Li,et al.  Towards a low-carbon future in China's building sector—A review of energy and climate models forecast , 2008 .

[36]  K. J Eaton,et al.  A comparative life cycle assessment of steel and concrete framed office buildings , 1997 .

[37]  Zhu Yan,et al.  Models for life-cycle energy consumption and environmental emissions in residential buildings , 2010 .

[38]  Chris Hendrickson,et al.  Economic Input-output Life-cycle Assessment of U.S. Residential Buildings , 2002 .

[39]  Appu Haapio,et al.  A critical review of building environmental assessment tools , 2008 .

[40]  Gu Lijing,et al.  Life cycle assessment for China building environment impacts , 2006 .

[41]  G. Finnveden,et al.  Nord 1995:20: Nordic guidelines on life-cycle assessment , 1995 .

[42]  Hugo Hens,et al.  Life Cycle Optimization of Extremely Low Energy Dwellings , 2007 .

[43]  Zhang Zhi-hui.  Assessment of Life-cycle Carbon Emission for Buildings , 2010 .

[44]  Sungho Tae,et al.  Development of a Life Cycle Assessment Program for building (SUSB-LCA) in South Korea , 2009 .

[45]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators☆ , 1996 .

[46]  I. G. Capeluto,et al.  Climatic considerations in school building design in the hot-humid climate for reducing energy consumption , 2009 .

[47]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[48]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of a commercial office building in Thailand , 2008 .

[49]  Oscar Ortiz,et al.  Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA , 2009 .

[50]  Kejun Jiang,et al.  Energy demand and emissions in 2030 in China: scenarios and policy options , 2006 .

[51]  A. Horvath,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment of Office Buildings in Europe and the United States , 2006 .

[52]  E. Holleris Petersen,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of four multi-family buildings , 2001 .

[53]  A. Dimoudi,et al.  Energy and environmental indicators related to construction of office buildings , 2008 .

[54]  M. Curran.  Life-cycle Assessment: Inventory Guidelines and Principles , 1994 .

[55]  Gillian Frances Menzies,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A Review , 2009 .

[56]  Zhang Xu,et al.  Inventory analysis of LCA on steel- and concrete-construction office buildings , 2008 .

[57]  Robert Ries,et al.  Life cycle assessment of electrical and thermal energy systems for commercial buildings , 2007 .

[58]  Qian Ku.  Carbon Emission Assessment of Building Life Cycle , 2010 .

[59]  P. Börjesson,et al.  Greenhouse gas balances in building construction : wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives , 2000 .

[60]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials , 2006 .

[61]  Ross Spiegel,et al.  Green building materials : a guide to product selection and specification , 1999 .

[62]  T. Muneer,et al.  Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland , 2007 .

[63]  B. Solberg,et al.  Environmental and economic impacts of substitution between wood products and alternative materials: a review of micro-level analyses from Norway and Sweden , 2005 .

[64]  Dundar F. Kocaoglu,et al.  A decision model for energy resource selection in China , 2009, PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.