Sugar-to-What? An Environmental Merit Order Curve for Biobased Chemicals and Plastics

The chemical industry aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) by adopting biomass as a renewable carbon feedstock. However, biomass is a limited resource. Thus, biomass should preferentially be used in processes that most reduce GHG emissions. However, a lack of harmonization in current life cycle assessment (LCA) literature makes the identification of efficient processes difficult. In this study, 46 fermentation processes from literature are harmonized and analyzed on the basis of their GHG reduction compared with fossil benchmarks. The GHG reduction per amount of sugar used is defined as Sugar-to-X efficiency and used as a performance metric in the following. The analyzed processes span a wide range of Sugar-to-X efficiencies from −3.3 to 6.7 kg of CO2 equiv per kg of sugar input. Diverting sugar from bioethanol production for fuels to the fermentation and bioconversion processes with the highest Sugar-to-X efficiency could reduce the chemical industry’s GHG emissions by an additional 130 MT of CO2 equiv without requiring any more biobased feedstocks.

[1]  N. Wierckx,et al.  The metabolic potential of plastics as biotechnological carbon sources - Review and targets for the future. , 2021, Metabolic engineering.

[2]  A. Bardow,et al.  Towards aromatics from biomass: Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of bio-based aniline , 2021 .

[3]  G. Norris,et al.  Carbon intensity of corn ethanol in the United States: state of the science , 2021, Environmental Research Letters.

[4]  D. Petrides,et al.  Economic Process Evaluation and Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment of Bio-Aromatics Production , 2020, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.

[5]  Ioannis K. Kookos,et al.  Hybridised sustainability metrics for use in life cycle assessment of bio-based products: resource efficiency and circularity , 2020, Green Chemistry.

[6]  Ajay V. Shah,et al.  Techno-Economic Analysis of Bio-Based Lactic Acid Production Utilizing Corn Grain as Feedstock , 2020, Processes.

[7]  Peter Fantke,et al.  Environmental hotspots of lactic acid production systems , 2019, GCB Bioenergy.

[8]  Li Shen,et al.  Can we assess innovative bio-based chemicals in their early development stage? A comparison between early-stage and life cycle assessments , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[9]  S. Suh,et al.  Climate change mitigation potential of carbon capture and utilization in the chemical industry , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  M. Realff,et al.  Techno‐economic analysis of 1,4‐butanediol production by a single‐step bioconversion process , 2019, Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining.

[11]  Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez,et al.  Biomass Conversion into Fuels, Chemicals, or Electricity? A Network-Based Life Cycle Optimization Approach Applied to the European Union , 2019, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering.

[12]  Paul J. Dauenhauer,et al.  Process Design and Economic Analysis of Renewable Isoprene from Biomass via Mesaconic Acid , 2019, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering.

[13]  T. Beringer,et al.  Assessing the efficiency of changes in land use for mitigating climate change , 2018, Nature.

[14]  Rylie E O Pelton,et al.  Spatial greenhouse gas emissions from US county corn production , 2018, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[15]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Life cycle assessment of adipic acid production from lignin , 2018 .

[16]  J. Görgens,et al.  Process design and economic analysis of a biorefinery co-producing itaconic acid and electricity from sugarcane bagasse and trash lignocelluloses. , 2018, Bioresource technology.

[17]  E. Worrell,et al.  Production of 1,3‐butadiene and ε‐caprolactam from C6 sugars: Techno‐economic analysis , 2018 .

[18]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Bio-based plastics - A review of environmental, social and economic impact assessments , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[19]  A. Straathof,et al.  Perspectives for the microbial production of methyl propionate integrated with product recovery. , 2018, Bioresource technology.

[20]  E. Peduzzi,et al.  On the Assessment of the CO2 Mitigation Potential of Woody Biomass , 2018, Front. Energy Res..

[21]  Mathias Janssen,et al.  Prospective life cycle assessment of bio-based adipic acid production from forest residues , 2017 .

[22]  T. Junqueira,et al.  Process development and techno‐economic analysis of bio‐based succinic acid derived from pentoses integrated to a sugarcane biorefinery , 2017 .

[23]  Alberta Carpenter,et al.  Evaluating opportunities to improve material and energy impacts in commodity supply chains , 2017, Environment Systems and Decisions.

[24]  Timothy M. Smith,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of fossil and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles , 2016 .

[25]  George G. Zaimes,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Life Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Priority Biobased Chemicals , 2016 .

[26]  Christopher J. Scarlata,et al.  Chemicals from Biomass: A Market Assessment of Bioproducts with Near-Term Potential , 2016 .

[27]  Fabrizio Passarini,et al.  Butadiene from biomass, a life cycle perspective to address sustainability in the chemical industry , 2016 .

[28]  Angélique Léonard,et al.  Does biobased polymer achieve better environmental impacts than fossil polymer? Comparison of fossil HDPE and biobased HDPE produced from sugar beet and wheat , 2016 .

[29]  Stefan Pauliuk,et al.  Lifting Industrial Ecology Modeling to a New Level of Quality and Transparency: A Call for More Transparent Publications and a Collaborative Open Source Software Framework , 2015 .

[30]  Fengqi You,et al.  Life-cycle Analysis of Bioproducts and Their Conventional Counterparts in GREET , 2015 .

[31]  T H VinkErwin,et al.  Life Cycle Inventory and Impact Assessment Data for 2014 Ingeo™ Polylactide Production , 2015 .

[32]  S. Searle,et al.  A reassessment of global bioenergy potential in 2050 , 2015 .

[33]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Environmental and economic assessment of lactic acid production from glycerol using cascade bio- and chemocatalysis , 2015 .

[34]  W Michael Griffin,et al.  Changing the renewable fuel standard to a renewable material standard: bioethylene case study. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  A. Faaij,et al.  Competing uses of biomass for energy and chemicals: implications for long‐term global CO2 mitigation potential , 2015 .

[36]  Deger Saygin,et al.  Competing uses of biomass : Assessment and comparison of the performance of bio-based heat, power, fuels and materials , 2014 .

[37]  Jeongwoo Han,et al.  Life-cycle fossil energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of bioderived chemicals and their conventional counterparts. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  Jinglan Hong,et al.  Life cycle assessment of corn- and cassava-based ethylene production , 2014 .

[39]  Pomthong Malakul,et al.  Comparative assessment of the environmental profile of PLA and PET drinking water bottles from a life cycle perspective , 2014 .

[40]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Succinic acid production derived from carbohydrates: An energy and greenhouse gas assessment of a platform chemical toward a bio‐based economy , 2014 .

[41]  Hong Wang,et al.  Biomass resources and their bioenergy potential estimation: A review , 2013 .

[42]  A. Straathof,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of succinic acid production using adsorption from fermentation medium. , 2013 .

[43]  Steven De Meester,et al.  Life cycle assessment of bioethanol‐based PVC , 2013 .

[44]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Energy and greenhouse gas assessment of European glucose production from corn – a multiple allocation approach for a key ingredient of the bio-based economy , 2013 .

[45]  Christin Liptow,et al.  A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Study of Polyethylene Based on Sugarcane and Crude Oil , 2012 .

[46]  Martin K. Patel,et al.  Plastics derived from biological sources: present and future: a technical and environmental review. , 2012, Chemical reviews.

[47]  Rainer Zah,et al.  Heat, electricity, or transportation? The optimal use of residual and waste biomass in Europe from an environmental perspective. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[48]  T. Beringer,et al.  Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints , 2011 .

[49]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[50]  Ramani Narayan,et al.  Assessment of the environmental profile of PLA, PET and PS clamshell containers using LCA methodology , 2009 .

[51]  Y. Ni,et al.  Fermentative production of succinic acid from straw hydrolysate by Actinobacillus succinogenes. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[52]  L. Nielsen,et al.  An environmental life cycle assessment comparing Australian sugarcane with US corn and UK sugar beet as producers of sugars for fermentation. , 2008 .

[53]  Joseph J. Bozell,et al.  Feedstocks for the Future : Biorefinery Production of Chemicals from Renewable Carbon , 2008 .

[54]  S. Kabasci,et al.  Succinic Acid: A New Platform Chemical for Biobased Polymers from Renewable Resources , 2008 .

[55]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[56]  C. Field,et al.  Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[57]  B. D. Vries,et al.  Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach , 2007 .

[58]  Joseph J. Bozell,et al.  Feedstocks for the future : renewables for the production of chemicals and materials , 2006 .

[59]  Robert P. Anex,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of energy-based impacts of a biobased process for producing 1,3-propanediol , 2006 .

[60]  P. L. Rogers,et al.  Application of Biotechnology to Industrial Sustainability , 2005 .

[61]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Global bioenergy potentials through 2050 , 2001 .