Pupillary response and galvanic skin response during an imagery task

[1]  H. Simpson,et al.  Latency and magnitude of the pupillary response during an imagery task , 1968 .

[2]  A. Paivio,et al.  Magnitude and latency of the pupillary response during an imagery task as a function of stimulus abstractness and imagery ability , 1968 .

[3]  D Kahneman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory , 1966, Science.

[4]  A. Paivio,et al.  Latency of verbal associations and imagery to noun stimuli as a function of abstractness and generality. , 1966, Canadian journal of psychology.

[5]  A. Paivio,et al.  The effect of word abstractness and pleasantness on pupil size during an imagery task , 1966 .

[6]  E. Hess.  ATTITUDE AND PUPIL SIZE. , 1965, Scientific American.

[7]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving , 1964, Science.

[8]  R. N. Berry.  Task Difficulty, Performance, and Skin Conductance Levels , 1962 .

[9]  Berry Rn,et al.  Skin conductance levels and verbal recall. , 1962 .

[10]  H. Schlosberg,et al.  Relation of Skin Conductance and Rotary Pursuit during Extended Practice , 1961 .

[11]  B. Shmavonian,et al.  Investigation of psychophysiologic relationships with skin resistance measures. , 1959, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[12]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Allan Paivio,et al.  Latency of imaginal and verbal mediators as a function of stimulus and response concreteness-imagery , 1967 .

[14]  R. N. Berry,et al.  Skin conductance levels and verbal recall. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  R. Davis.  Modification of the galvanic reflex by daily repetition of a stimulus. , 1934 .