Assessing the impact of urbanization on storm runoff in a peri-urban catchment using historical change in impervious cover

his paper investigates changes in storm runoff resulting from the transformation of previously rural landscapes into peri-urban areas. Two adjacent catchments (∼5 km2) located within the town of Swindon in the United Kingdom were monitored during 2011 and 2012 providing continuous records of rainfall, runoff and actual evaporation. One catchment is highly urbanized and the other is a recently developed peri-urban area containing two distinct areas of drainage: one with mixed natural and storm drainage pathways, the other entirely storm drainage. Comparison of observed storm hydrographs showed that the degree of area serviced by storm drainage was a stronger determinant of storm runoff response than either impervious area or development type and that little distinction in hydrological response exists between urban and peri-urban developments of similar impervious cover when no significant hydraulic alteration is present. Historical levels of urbanization and impervious cover were mapped from the 1960s to the 2010s based on digitized historical topographic maps and were combined with a hydrological model to enable backcasting of the present day storm runoff response to that of the catchments in their earlier states. Results from the peri-urban catchment showed an increase in impervious cover from 11% in the 1960s to 44% in 2010s, and introduction of a large-scale storm drainage system in the early 2000s, was accompanied by a 50% reduction in the Muskingum routing parameter k, reducing the characteristic flood duration by over 50% while increasing peak flow by over 400%. Comparisons with changes in storm runoff response in the more urban area suggest that the relative increase in peak flows and reduction in flood duration and response time of a catchment is greatest at low levels of urbanization and that the introduction of storm water conveyance systems significantly increases the flashiness of storm runoff above that attributed to impervious area alone. This study demonstrates that careful consideration is required when using impervious cover data within hydrological models and when designing flood mitigation measures, particularly in peri-urban areas where a widespread loss in pervious surfaces and alteration of drainage pathways can significantly alter the storm runoff response. Recommendations include utilizing more refined urban land use typologies that can better represent physical alteration of hydrological pathways.

[1]  Mary Lynn Baeck,et al.  Analyses of Urban Drainage Network Structure and its Impact on Hydrologic Response 1 , 2010 .

[2]  Jiri Nossent,et al.  Improving hydrological model parameterisation in urbanised catchments: remote sensing derived impervious surface cover maps , 2009 .

[3]  Lord Bourne,et al.  Department for Communities and Local Government: Troubled families programme: transforming the lives of thousands of families , 2016 .

[4]  R. Wilkie.  The National Planning Policy Framework , 2012 .

[5]  Isabelle Braud,et al.  Evidence of the impact of urbanization on the hydrological regime of a medium-sized periurban catchment in France , 2013 .

[6]  J. Packman.  The effects of urbanisation on flood magnitude and frequency , 1980 .

[7]  C. Jacobson.  Identification and quantification of the hydrological impacts of imperviousness in urban catchments: a review. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  T. Kjeldsen,et al.  Modelling design flood hydrographs in catchments with mixed urban and rural land cover , 2013 .

[9]  J. Wösten,et al.  Development and use of a database of hydraulic properties of European soils , 1999 .

[10]  J. Janeau,et al.  Rainfall/runoff processes in a small peri‐urban catchment in the Andes mountains. The Rumihurcu Quebrada, Quito (Ecuador) , 2001 .

[11]  G. Hollis.  The Effect of Urbanization on Floods of Different Recurrence Interval , 1975 .

[12]  Steven J. Burian,et al.  Determining Effective Impervious Area for Urban Hydrologic Modeling , 2009 .

[13]  F. Canters,et al.  Improving Distributed Runoff Prediction in Urbanized Catchments with Remote Sensing based Estimates of Impervious Surface Cover , 2008, Italian National Conference on Sensors.

[14]  J. Wen,et al.  Effect of growing watershed imperviousness on hydrograph parameters and peak discharge , 2008 .

[15]  Rizwan Nawaz,et al.  An investigation into the extent and impacts of hard surfacing of domestic gardens in an area of Leeds, United Kingdom , 2008 .

[16]  Helen C. Ward,et al.  Multi-season eddy covariance observations of energy, water and carbon fluxes over a suburban area in Swindon, UK , 2012 .

[17]  Tomas Vitvar,et al.  Effects of suburban development on runoff generation in the Croton River basin, New York, USA , 2005 .

[18]  Hyeonjun Kim,et al.  Prediction of Reservoir Water Level using CAT , 2012 .

[19]  T. Mayr,et al.  Pedotransfer functions to estimate soil water retention parameters for a modified Brooks-Corey type model , 1999 .

[20]  Frank Canters,et al.  Use of Impervious Surface Data Obtained from Remote Sensing in Distributed Hydrological Modeling of Urban Areas , 2011 .

[21]  A. Mejia,et al.  Spatial Patterns of Urban Development from Optimization of Flood Peaks and Imperviousness-Based Measures , 2009 .

[22]  Pete Dimitrijevic,et al.  National Planning Policy Framework , 2014 .

[23]  R. Reynolds,et al.  Effects of urbanization on base flow of selected south-shore streams , 1982 .

[24]  A. Thomasson,et al.  Water Retention, Porosity and Density of Field Soils , 1977 .

[25]  R. Hill,et al.  The UK Land Cover Map 2000: Construction of a Parcel-Based Vector Map from Satellite Images , 2002 .

[26]  X. Pons,et al.  Land cover change in Europe between 1950 and 2000 determined employing aerial photography , 2010 .

[27]  Stephen Grebby,et al.  Mapping long-term temporal change in imperviousness using topographic maps , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[28]  T. Kjeldsen.  The revitalised FSR/FEH rainfall-runoff method , 2007 .

[29]  Richard A. Wadsworth,et al.  Final Report for LCM2007 - the new UK land cover map. Countryside Survey Technical Report No 11/07 , 2011 .

[30]  T. Marsh,et al.  The 2010-12 drought and subsequent extensive flooding: a remarkable hydrological transformation , 2013 .

[31]  M. Wigmosta,et al.  Hydrological Effects of Land-Use Change in a Zero-Order Catchment , 1998 .

[32]  Alexandre Oliveira Tavares,et al.  Spatial and temporal land use change and occupation over the last half century in a peri-urban area , 2012 .

[33]  M. Scholz,et al.  Treatment of Road Runoff by a Combined Storm Water Treatment, Detention and Infiltration System , 2009 .

[34]  H. Andrieu,et al.  Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: A state of the art , 2013 .

[35]  A. Roy,et al.  Assessing Impervious Surface Connectivity and Applications for Watershed Management 1 , 2009 .

[36]  E. Alexander.  Bulk densities of California soils in relation to other soil properties. , 1980 .

[37]  Isabelle Braud,et al.  Hydrology of peri-urban catchments: processes and modelling , 2013 .

[38]  B. Bledsoe,et al.  How do flow peaks and durations change in suburbanizing semi-arid watersheds? A southern California case study , 2011 .

[39]  R. Parker,et al.  Communities and Local Government , 2008 .

[40]  Fred L. Ogden,et al.  Relative importance of impervious area, drainage density, width function, and subsurface storm drainage on flood runoff from an urbanized catchment , 2011 .