Pseudoaccommodative cornea treatment using the NIDEK EC-5000 CXIII excimer laser in myopic and hyperopic presbyopes.

PURPOSE To investigate the refractive outcomes and spherical aberration of multifocal LASIK to create a distant-dominant center and near-dominant periphery in hyperopic, myopic, and emmetropic presbyopia. METHODS One hundred ninety-five eyes with myopic presbyopia and 119 eyes with hyperopic or emmetropic presbyopia that underwent LASIK or epithelial LASIK (epi-LASIK) were assessed out to 3 months postoperatively. All eyes underwent the pseudoaccommodative cornea (PAC) treatment using aspheric ablation profiles and wavefront correction with the NIDEK CXIII excimer laser. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -3.80+/-2.10 diopters (D) for myopic presbyopia and +1.00+/-0.92 D for hyperopic or emmetropic presbyopia. RESULTS Mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -0.40+/-0.77 D for myopic presbyopia and +0.15+/-0.62 D for hyperopic or emmetropic presbyopia. Functional vision, defined as 20/30 or better distance uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) combined with J3 or better near UCVA, was achieved in 162 (83%) eyes with myopic presbyopia and 103 (87%) eyes with hyperopic or emmetropic presbyopia. An induction of 0.312 microm of spherical aberration was noted at 6 mm for myopic presbyopia treatments and 0.016 microm for hyperopic presbyopia treatments. CONCLUSIONS The distance-dominant center used for PAC treatments is effective in emmetropic, myopic, and hyperopic presbyopia. The induced spherical aberration allows for depth of focus in patients with presbyopia.

[1]  G. Waring,et al.  Topographically guided LASIK for myopia using the Nidek CXII customized aspheric treatment zone (CATz). , 2007, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[2]  Alain P Telandro Pseudo-accommodative cornea: a new concept for correction of presbyopia. , 2004, Journal of refractive surgery.

[3]  Eduardo Tepichín,et al.  Objective quality of vision in presbyopic and non-presbyopic patients after pseudoaccommodative advanced surface ablation. , 2005, Journal of refractive surgery.

[4]  H. Gimbel,et al.  Simultaneous bilateral laser in situ keratomileusis: safety and efficacy. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[5]  K. Tsubota,et al.  Comparison of LASIK using the NIDEK EC-5000 optimized aspheric transition zone (OATz) and conventional ablation profile. , 2006, Journal of refractive surgery.

[6]  G. Kounis,et al.  Two‐year follow‐up of conductive keratoplasty for the treatment of hyperopic astigmatism , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  Robert Montés-Micó,et al.  Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  Roberto Bellucci,et al.  Multifocal intraocular lenses , 2005, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[9]  Anna Simonetto,et al.  Correction of presbyopia in hyperopia with a center-distance, paracentral-near technique using the Technolas 217z platform. , 2008, Journal of refractive surgery.

[10]  Charles D Reilly,et al.  Surgical Monovision and Monovision Reversal in LASIK , 2006, Cornea.