Location of electric current sources in the human brain estimated by the dipole tracing method of the scalp-skull-brain (SSB) head model.

Using a realistic, 3-shell head model including the scalp (S), skull (S) and brain (B) with conductivity ratios of 1:1/80:1, respectively, the electrical activity in the human brain recorded by conventional electroencephalography was approximated by 1 or 2 equivalent current dipoles. The dipole locations and vector moments were estimated by minimizing the squared difference between the potentials actually recorded from the scalp and those theoretically calculated from the equivalent dipoles. The validity of this dipole tracing method (the DT of the SSB head model) was tested in patients with focal epileptic seizures undergoing presurgical evaluation with intracranial subdural strip electrodes. Weak currents were passed through 1 or 2 pairs of subdural electrodes to create artificial dipoles. The dipole estimations correctly distinguished between single and double generator sources, but there were certain dislocations of the calculated dipoles. The average error of dislocation was found to be 8.5 mm for the 1-dipole model. That for the 2-dipole model was 6 mm for one of the components and 18 mm for the other. It was concluded that the DT method of the SSB head model can be a valuable clinical tool in 3-dimensional localization of focal epileptic discharges in the human brain.

[1]  D L Jewett,et al.  Insidious errors in dipole localization parameters at a single time-point due to model misspecification of number of shells. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  Yoshiwo Okamoto,et al.  Limitation of the Inverse Problem in Body Surface Potential Mapping , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  D. A. Driscoll,et al.  EEG electrode sensitivity--an application of reciprocity. , 1969, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[4]  Kazutomo Yunokuchi,et al.  Tests of EEG localization accuracy using implanted sources in the human brain , 1991, Annals of neurology.

[5]  Toshimitsu Musha,et al.  Electric Dipole Tracing in the Brain by Means of the Boundary Element Method and Its Accuracy , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  M Schneider Effect of inhomogeneities on surface signals coming from a cerebral current-dipole source. , 1974, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[7]  R D Sidman,et al.  A reliable method for localizing deep intracranial sources of the EEG , 1985, Neurology.

[8]  B. N. Cuffin,et al.  A Comparison of Moving Dipole Inverse Solutions Using EEG's and MEG's , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Onno W. Weier,et al.  On the numerical accuracy of the boundary element method (EEG application) , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  D L Jewett,et al.  The effect of media inhomogeneities upon intracranial electrical fields. , 1972, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[11]  M. R. Osborne,et al.  Methods for unconstrained optimization problems , 1968 .

[12]  S. Sato,et al.  How well does a three-sphere model predict positions of dipoles in a realistically shaped head? , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.