Merging Asset Allocation and Longevity Insurance: An Optimal Perspective on Payout Annuities

The Markowitz mean-variance model is widely accepted as the gold standard for asset allocation on the way to retirement. Unfortunately, this framework only considers the risk and return tradeoff in the financial market. It does not consider the longevity risk people face during retirement. And, while a variety of recent papers in the Journal of Financial Planning have discussed the mechanics and importance of payout (also known as lifetime) annuities, the industry literature currently lacks a coherent and formal model of how much wealth should be allocated in-and-between asset classes within a payout annuity. To fill this gap, our paper revisits the importance of longevity insurance – while discussing the problems with fixed payout annuities -and then moves on to address the proper asset allocation between conventional financial assets and variable payout annuity products. As in the classical Markowitz framework, our focus is on maximizing a suitably defined objective function in an intuitive, comprehensible, and practical manner. In addition to the usual risk and return information from the financial markets, our modeling framework requires inputs on the relative strength of retiree’s bequest motives, subjective health status, and liquidity restrictions. To illustrate the model, we provide some specific case studies and numerical examples to show how a financial planner can actually apply asset allocation ideas within-and-between payout annuity products and conventional asset classes. 1 Vice President and Director of Research, Ibbotson Associates, 225 N. Michigan Ave. Suite 700, Chicago, IL 60601. Phone: (312) 616-1620; Fax: (312) 616-0404; E-mail: pchen@ibbotson.com. 2 Executive Director, The IFID Centre A Fax: (416) 736-5487; E-mail: milevsky@yorku.ca.

[1]  J. Poterba,et al.  Joint Life Annuities and Annuity Demand by Married Couples , 1999 .

[2]  Moshe A. Milevsky,et al.  Optimal Annuitization Policies , 2001 .

[3]  David Blake,et al.  Pensionmetrics 2: stochastic pension plan design during the distribution phase , 2003 .

[4]  Mark J. Warshawsky,et al.  Making Retirement Income Last a Lifetime , 2001 .

[5]  Andrew B. Abel,et al.  Specification of the Joy of Giving: Insights from Altruism , 1987 .

[6]  R. C. Merton,et al.  Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous-Time Model* , 1975 .

[7]  Jeffrey R. Brown,et al.  Longevity-Insured Retirement Distributions from Pension Plans: Market and Regulatory Issues , 2001 .

[8]  Scott F. Richard,et al.  Optimal consumption, portfolio and life insurance rules for an uncertain lived individual in a continuous time model , 1975 .

[9]  G. Schwert The journal of financial economics*1: A retrospective evaluation (1974-1991) , 1993 .

[10]  J. Poterba The History of Annuities in the United States , 1997 .

[11]  Sandeep Kapur,et al.  A Portfolio Approach to Investment and Annuitization During Retirement , 1999 .

[12]  M. Yaari,et al.  Uncertain lifetime, life insurance, and the theory of the consumer , 1965 .

[13]  O. Mitchell,et al.  New Evidence on the Money's Worth of Individual Annuities , 1997 .

[14]  B. Bernheim How Strong Are Bequest Motives? Evidence Based on Estimates of the Demand for Life Insurance and Annuities , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  A. Brugiavini Uncertainty resolution and the timing of annuity purchases , 1993 .

[16]  Y. Nishigaki,et al.  The Inefficiency of Private Constant Annuities , 1993 .

[17]  M. Milevsky,et al.  OPTIMAL ANNUITIZATION POLICIES : ANALYSIS OF THE OPTIONS , 2000 .

[18]  Thomas S. Salisbury,et al.  Asset Allocation and the Liquidity Premium for Illiquid Annuities , 2003 .

[19]  M. Milevsky,et al.  The Real Option to Delay Annuitization: It's Not Now-or-Never , 2001 .