Is Environmental Improvement in Automotive Component Design Highly Constrained?

This article investigates the influence of environmental, cost, and performance requirements on the design and management of automotive components through a case study involving instrument panels. To address the question of whether the environmental improvement of an instrument panel (IP) is highly constrained, a lifecycle inventory analysis is used to characterize the major environmental burdens associated with a generic IP defined from an average of three midsized vehicle models. A life‐cycle cost analysis is also conducted to understand the market forces operating in the domains of the original equipment manufacturer; consumer; and end‐of‐life (EOL) vehicle managen. This study indicates that the existing set of environmental requirements, in conjunction with current cost drivers and the large set of manufacturing and use phase functional performance requirements, highly constrain opportunities for environmental improvement Specific improvement strategies‐lightweighting, elimination of the painting operation, and reduction in material complexity‐are examined in the context of existing system requirements. The near‐term forecast for improvements is not optimistic. Innovation will continue in a slow and piecemeal fashion until requirements affecting the total vehicle system are significantly changed

[1]  D. Menerey,et al.  Life cycle design guidance manual. Environmental requirements and the product system. Final report , 1993 .

[2]  M. Harsch,et al.  Life-Cycle Engineering of Automobile Painting Processes , 1997 .

[3]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life Cycle Design Criteria for Engine Oil Filters: AlliedSignal Case Study , 1995 .

[4]  J. Sullivan,et al.  Life Cycle Energy Analysis for Automobiles , 1995 .

[5]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment and Design of Instrument Panels: A Common Sense Approach , 1997 .

[6]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  The application of life cycle assessment to design , 1993 .

[7]  Steven B. Young,et al.  Applying environmental life-cycle analysis to materials , 1994 .

[8]  Dave Chapman,et al.  Design Advantages and Benefits of the Chrysler Dakota Fully Integrated Thermoplastic Instrument Panel , 1996 .

[9]  Mary Ann Curran.  Life-Cycle Assessment , 1994 .

[10]  Jeff S. McDaniel.  Application of Life Cycle Assessment and Design Tools to Instrument Panels: Analysis for Common Sense Initiative Pilot Project , 1997 .

[11]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Industrial ecology of the automobile : a life cycle perspective , 1997 .

[12]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle design framework and demonstration projects. Profiles of at and T and AlliedSignal , 1995 .

[13]  Allen Blakey,et al.  Municipal solid waste disposal trends: 1996 update , 1996 .

[14]  Mary Ann Curran,et al.  Environmental life-cycle assessment , 1996 .

[15]  Mark A. Delucchi,et al.  Transportation, energy, and environment : how far can technology take us? , 1997 .

[16]  K. Higuchi,et al.  Closed loop recycling of magnesium PC housing , 1996, Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. ISEE-1996.