The role of suppliers in market intelligence gathering for radical and incremental innovation

Drawing on transaction cost economics theory, this study addresses the following research questions: (1) Does supplier involvement in market intelligence gathering activities have a greater impact on innovation success in predesign or commercialization activities? and (2) Does supplier involvement in market intelligence gathering activities have a greater impact on success in radical or incremental product innovation? Hypotheses are tested using both subjective and objective measures of success from a study of 205 incremental and 110 radical new product development projects. Results from the estimation of a two-group path model suggest that this theoretical framework is useful in providing guidance as to when product developers should emphasize the gathering of market intelligence through suppliers. Consistent with conventional wisdom, the findings suggest that supplier involvement in market intelligence gathering activities are positively related to success in incremental innovations across predesign and commercialization activities. However, supplier involvement in market intelligence gathering activities is found to have no significant impact on market share and is negatively associated with perceived product performance in radical innovations in predesign tasks. Also, while there was no significant difference in market share for supplier involvement in market intelligence gathering activities between radical and incremental innovation in commercialization activities, supplier involvement in these activities did have a greater impact on perceived product performance in radical innovation than it did in incremental innovation. Although current practice suggests that teams allocate fewer resources to the gathering of market intelligence through their suppliers during predesign activities in incremental innovation projects compared with radical innovation projects, the findings in this study suggest that they should do the opposite. Shifting resources allocated for engaging suppliers in market information gathering activities in predesign activities from radical innovation projects to incremental innovation projects could increase the return on these investments. Alternatively, these resources currently allocated to the gathering of market intelligence through suppliers in predesign activities of radical innovation projects could also provide greater benefits if allocated to commercialization activities of radical innovation projects, where they have the greatest positive impact.

[1]  P. Kotler.  A Generic Concept of Marketing , 1972 .

[2]  H. H. Kassarjian.  Content Analysis in Consumer Research , 1977 .

[3]  O. Williamson.  Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations , 1979, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[4]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[5]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[6]  O. Williamson.  The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  J. Hage,et al.  Theories of Organizations: Form, Process, and Transformation. , 1982 .

[8]  C. Merle Crawford,et al.  New Products Management , 1983 .

[9]  G. Walker,et al.  A Transaction Cost Approach to Make-or-Buy Decisions , 1984 .

[10]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[11]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[12]  George S. Day,et al.  Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority , 1988 .

[13]  K. Eisenhardt.  Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[14]  John C. Narver,et al.  The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability , 1990 .

[15]  Jan B. Heide.  Interorganizational Governance in Marketing Channels , 1994 .

[16]  O. Williamson.  Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives , 1994 .

[17]  C. Moorman.  Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes , 1995 .

[18]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[19]  Jeffrey H. Dyer.  Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage : Evidence from the auto industry , 1996 .

[20]  Mitsuo Nagamachi,et al.  Supplier involvement in automotive component design: are there really large US Japan differences? , 1996 .

[21]  O. Williamson,et al.  The mechanisms of governance , 1996 .

[22]  M. Parry,et al.  A Cross-National Comparative Study of New Product Development Processes: Japan and the United States , 1997 .

[23]  J. Liker,et al.  Risky Business or Competitive Power? Supplier Involvement in Japanese Product Design , 1997 .

[24]  M. Parry,et al.  The Determinants of Japanese New Product Successes , 1997 .

[25]  J. H. Dyer.  Effective interim collaboration: how firms minimize transaction costs and maximise transaction value , 1997 .

[26]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity , 1997 .

[27]  M. Fisher.  What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product , 1997 .

[28]  Jinhong Xie,et al.  The Impact of Cross‐Functional Joint Involvement Across Product Development Stages: An Exploratory Study , 1998 .

[29]  R. Calantone,et al.  The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[30]  Charles Despres,et al.  New product development and early supplier involvement (ESI): the drivers of ESI adoption , 1998 .

[31]  M. Montoya-Weiss,et al.  Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products , 1998 .

[32]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  Challenges of managing the development of breakthrough products in Japan , 1999 .

[33]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  THE INVISIBLE SUCCESS FACTORS IN PRODUCT INNOVATION , 1999 .

[34]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  From Experience: The invisible success factors in product innovation , 1999 .

[35]  J. Mentzer,et al.  The Effects of Strategy Type on the Market Orientation–Performance Relationship , 2000 .

[36]  Jinhong Xie,et al.  Does Innovativeness Moderate the Relationship between Cross-Functional Integration and Product Performance? , 2000 .

[37]  R. Handfield,et al.  New Product Development: Strategies for Supplier Integration , 2000 .

[38]  S. Vickery,et al.  The ability to minimize the timing of new product development and introduction: an examination of antecedent factors in the North American automobile supplier industry , 2000 .

[39]  Richard Leifer,et al.  Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts , 2000 .

[40]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[41]  X. Michael Song,et al.  An empirical investigation into the antecedents of knowledge dissemination at the strategic business unit level , 2003 .

[42]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: Implications for project performance , 2001 .

[43]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Sourcing By Design: Product Complexity and the Supply Chain , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[44]  Berend Wierenga,et al.  Erim Report Series Research in Management the Effectiveness of Different Mechanisms for Integrating Marketing and R & D Bibliographic Data and Classifications , 2022 .

[45]  Gary L. Ragatz,et al.  Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty , 2002 .

[46]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  An attitudinal model of technology-based self-service: Moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors , 2002 .

[47]  G. O'Connor,et al.  Managing radical innovation: an overview of emergent strategy issues , 2002 .

[48]  Finn Wynstra,et al.  Exploring purchasing integration in product development , 2003 .

[49]  Elliot Rabinovich,et al.  A Transaction-Efficiency Analysis of an Internet Retailing Supply Chain in the Music CD Industry , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[50]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  Innovation generation in supply chain relationships: A conceptual model and research propositions , 2004 .

[51]  Erin Anderson,et al.  The Salesperson as Outside Agent or Employee: A Transaction Cost Analysis , 2008, Mark. Sci..