Contraceptive use among U.S. women having abortions in 2000-2001.

CONTEXT Knowing the extent to which contraceptive nonuse, incorrect or inconsistent use, and method failure account for unintended pregnancies ending in abortion, as well as reasons for nonuse and imperfect use, can help policymakers and family planning providers support effective contraceptive use. METHODS Contraceptive use patterns among a nationally representative sample of 10,683 women receiving abortion services in 2000-2001 were examined, as well as reasons for nonuse, problems with the most frequently used methods and the impact emergency contraceptive pills have had on abortion rates. RESULTS Forty-six percent of women had not used a contraceptive method in the month they conceived, mainly because of perceived low risk of pregnancy and concerns about contraception (cited by 33% and 32% of nonusers respectively). The male condom was the most commonly reported method among all women (28%), followed by the pill (14%). Inconsistent method use was the main cause of pregnancy for 49% of condom users and 76% of pill users; 42% of condom users cited condom breakage or slippage as a reason for pregnancy. Substantial proportions of pill and condom users indicated perfect method use (13-14%). As many as 51,000 abortions were averted by use of emergency contraceptive pills in 2000. CONCLUSIONS Women and men need accurate information about fertility cycles and about the risk of pregnancy when a contraceptive is not used or is used imperfectly. Increased use of emergency contraceptive pills could further reduce levels of unintended pregnancy and abortion.

[1]  S. Henshaw Unintended pregnancy in the United States. , 1998, Family planning perspectives.

[2]  W. Mosher,et al.  Trends in contraceptive use in the United States: 1982-1995. , 1998, Family planning perspectives.

[3]  G. Piaggio,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception , 1998, The Lancet.

[4]  Susheela Singh,et al.  Contraceptive failure in the first two years of use: differences across socioeconomic subgroups. , 2001, Family planning perspectives.

[5]  J. Darroch,et al.  Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health Data Collection Patterns in the Socioeconomic Characteristics of Women Obtaining Abortions in 2000–2001 , 2022 .

[6]  L. Potter,et al.  Measuring compliance among oral contraceptive users. , 1996, Family planning perspectives.

[7]  J. Trussell,et al.  New estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception. , 1998, Contraception.

[8]  V. Clark,et al.  Evaluation of the efficacy of a polyurethane condom: results from a randomized, controlled clinical trial. , 1999, Family planning perspectives.

[9]  J. Darroch,et al.  Changing emphases in sexuality education in U.S. public secondary schools, 1988-1999. , 2000, Family planning perspectives.

[10]  J. Trussell,et al.  Updated estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception. , 1999, Contraception.

[11]  S. Henshaw,et al.  The characteristics and prior contraceptive use of U.S. abortion patients. , 1988, Family planning perspectives.

[12]  S. Henshaw,et al.  Abortion patients in 1994-1995: characteristics and contraceptive use. , 1996, Family planning perspectives.

[13]  E. Maticka-Tyndale,et al.  Teenage Sexual and Reproductive Behavior in Developed Countries , 2001 .

[14]  M. Potts,et al.  Contraceptive technology. , 1984, Draper Fund report.