Studies in Contemporary Phrase Structure Grammar: The lexical integrity of Japanese causatives

Grammatical theory has long wrestled with the fact that causative constructions exhibit properties of both single words and complex phrases. However, as Paul Kiparsky has observed, the distribution of such properties of causatives is not arbitrary: ‘construal’ phenomena such as honorification, anaphor and pronominal binding, and quantifier ‘floating’ typically behave as they would if causatives were syntactically complex, embedding constructions; whereas case marking, agreement and word order phenomena all point to the analysis of causatives as single lexical items. Although an analysis of causatives in terms of complex syntactic structures has frequently been adopted in an attempt to simplify the mapping to semantic structure, we believe that motivating syntactic structure based on perceived semantics is questionable because in general a syntax/semantics homomorphism cannot be maintained without vitiating syntactic theory (Miller 1991). Instead, we sketch a strictly lexical theory of Japanese causatives that deals with the evidence offered for a complex phrasal analysis. Such an analysis makes the phonology, morphology and syntax parallel, while a mismatch occurs with the semantics. The conclusions we will reach are given in (1):

[1]  Mariko Saiki.  Grammatical functions in the syntax of Japanese nominals , 1987 .

[2]  Some Recent Trends in Syntactic Theory and the Japanese Language , 1981 .

[3]  Shûichi Yatabe.  Scrambling and Japanese Phrase Structure , 1993 .

[4]  Akira Ishikawa,et al.  Complex predicates and lexical operations in Japanese , 1988 .

[5]  J. J. Chew.  A transformational analysis of modern colloquial Japanese , 1973 .

[6]  Andreas Kathol,et al.  Linearization-based German syntax , 1995 .

[7]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  French Clitic Movement Without Clitics or Movement , 1997 .

[8]  Christopher D. Manning.  Ergativity : Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations , 2000 .

[9]  Nobuko Hasegawa.  Lexicalist Grammar and Japanese Passives , 1981 .

[10]  Shigeru Miyagawa.  Complex Verbs and the Lexicon , 1980 .

[11]  C. Pollard.  Anhaphors in English and the scope of binding theory , 1992 .

[12]  Richard Montague,et al.  The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English , 1973 .

[13]  Pete Whitelock,et al.  JAPANESE PHRASE STRUCTURE GRAMMAR: A UNIFICATION-BASED APPROACH (STUDIES IN NATURAL LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTIC , 1988 .

[14]  Gertjan van Noord,et al.  Adjuncts and the Processing of Lexical Rules , 1994, COLING.

[15]  R. Borsley.  Phrase-structure grammar and the Barriers conception of clause structure , 1989 .

[16]  John Hinds,et al.  Some Remarks on soo su- , 1973 .

[17]  Philip H. Miller,et al.  Clitics and constituents in phrase structure grammar , 1992 .

[18]  J. McCawley.  The phonological component of a grammar of Japanese , 1968 .

[19]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[20]  S.-Y. Kuroda,et al.  Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language , 1965 .

[21]  W. Poser.  The Phonetics and Phonology of Tone and Intonation in Japanese , 1990 .

[22]  Anthony Ruiz Davis,et al.  Lexical semantics and linking in the hierarchical lexicon , 1996 .

[23]  Yoshihisa Kitagawa.  Subjects in Japanese and English , 2018 .

[24]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Information-based syntax and semantics , 1987 .

[25]  S. Wechsler.  The semantic basis of argument structure , 1995 .

[26]  Alex Alsina,et al.  Predicate composition : a theory of syntactic function alternations , 1993 .

[27]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  An Integrated Theory of Complement Control. , 1991 .

[28]  N. A. Mccawley,et al.  The structure of the Japanese language , 1973 .

[29]  Shigeru Miyagawa,et al.  Structure and case marking in Japanese , 1989 .

[30]  Eun-Jung Yoo,et al.  A unified theory of scope for quantifiers and wh-phrases , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[31]  Masayo Iida.  Context and binding in Japanese , 1996 .

[32]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Quantification and Syntactic Theory , 1983 .

[33]  D. Flickinger.  Lexical rules in the hierarchical lexicon , 1989 .

[34]  J. Bresnan,et al.  The lexical integrity principle: Evidence from Bantu , 1995 .

[35]  S. I. Harada,et al.  "Counter Equi-NP deletion" , 1986 .

[36]  B. Levin,et al.  What to do with theta-roles , 1986 .