Structural polarity of kinetochore microtubules in PtK1 cells

The polarity of kinetochore microtubules (MTs) has been studied in lysed PtK1 cells by polymerizing hook-shaped sheets of neurotubulin onto walls of preexisting cellular MTs in a fashion that reveals their structural polarity. Three different approaches are presented here: (a) we have screened the polarity of all MTs in a given spindle cross section taken from the region between the kinetochores and the poles, (b) we have determined the polarity of kinetochore MTs are more stable to cold-treated spindles; this approach takes advantage of the fact that kinetochore MTs are more stable to cold treatment than other spindle MTs; and (c) we have tracked bundles of kinetochore MTs from the vicinity of the pole to the outer layer of the kinetochore in cold- treated cells. In an anaphase cell, 90-95% of all MTs in an area between the kinetochores and the poles are of uniform polarity with their plus ends (i.e., fast growing ends) distal to the pole. In cold- treated cells, all bundles of kinetochore MTs show the same polarity; the plus ends of the MTs are located at the kinetochores. We therefore conclude that kinetochore MTs in both metaphase and anaphase cells have the same polarity as the aster MTs in each half-spindle. These results can be interpreted in two ways: (a) virtually all MTs are initiated at the spindle poles and some of the are "captured" by matured kinetochores using an as yet unknown mechanism to bind the plus ends of existing MTs; (b) the growth of kinetochore MTs is initiated at the kinetochore in such a way that the fast growing MT end is proximal to the kinetochore. Our data are inconsistent with previous kinetochore MT polarity determinations based on growth rate measurements in vitro. These studies used drug-treated cells from which chromosomes were isolated to serve as seeds for initiation of neurotubule polymerization. It is possible that under these conditions kinetochores will initiate MTs with a polarity opposite to the one described here.

[1]  J. Snyder,et al.  Structure and physiology of the mammalian mitotic spindle. , 1975, Society of General Physiologists series.

[2]  S. Inoué,et al.  Mitosis in Barbulanympha. I. Spindle structure, formation, and kinetochore engagement , 1978, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  G. Borisy,et al.  Structural polarity and directional growth of microtubules of Chlamydomonas flagella. , 1974, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  B. Brinkley,et al.  COLD‐LABILE AND COLD‐STABLE MICROTUBULES IN THE MITOTIC SPINDLE OF MAMMALIAN CELLS * , 1975, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  R. Margolis,et al.  Mitotic mechanism based on intrinsic microtubule behaviour , 1978, Nature.

[6]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Polarity of some motility-related microtubules. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  G. Borisy,et al.  Head-to-tail polymerization of microtubules in vitro. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  Shinya Inoué,et al.  Cell Motility by Labile Association of Molecules , 1967, The Journal of general physiology.

[9]  A. Bajer Interaction of microtubules and the mechanism of chromosome movement (zipper hypothesis). 1. General principle. , 1973, Cytobios.

[10]  C. Cantor,et al.  Microtubule assembly in the absence of added nucleotides. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  R. Kuriyama,et al.  Polarity of microtubules nucleated by centrosomes and chromosomes of Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro , 1980, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Evidence for microtubule subunit addition to the distal end of mitotic structures in vitro , 1980, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Mitosis , 1951, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[14]  S. Inoué,et al.  Organization and Function of the Mitotic Spindle1 , 1964 .

[15]  J. McIntosh,et al.  STUDIES ON THE MECHANISM OF MITOSIS , 1975, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[16]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Model for Mitosis , 1969, Nature.

[17]  J. Pickett-Heaps,et al.  Cell division in two large pennate diatoms Hantzschia and Nitzschia III. A new proposal for kinetochore function during prometaphase , 1980, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  J. Rosenbaum,et al.  Dynein binds to and crossbridges cytoplasmic microtubules. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.