Surrogate data approaches to assess the significance of directed coherence: Application to EEG activity propagation

This paper addresses the topic of evaluating the significance of frequency domain measures of causal coupling in multivariate time series through generation of surrogate data. The considered approaches are the traditional Fourier Transform (FT) algorithm and a new causal FT (CFT) algorithm for surrogate data generation. Both algorithms preserve the FT modulus of the original series; differences are in the phase relationships, that are completely destroyed for FT surrogates and imposed after switching off the link over the considered causal direction for CFT surrogates. The ability of the algorithms to assess causality in the frequency domain was tested using the directed coherence as discriminating parameter. Evaluation on simulated multivariate linear processes and application over multichannel EEG recordings showed that the utilization of CFT surrogates improves specificity of the test for nonzero spectral causality, as FT surrogates may attribute to a direct coupling the presence of indirect connectivity patterns.

[1]  Steven Kay,et al.  Modern Spectral Estimation: Theory and Application , 1988 .

[2]  James Theiler,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data , 1992 .

[3]  Theiler,et al.  Generating surrogate data for time series with several simultaneously measured variables. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[4]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  T. Schreiber,et al.  Surrogate time series , 1999, chao-dyn/9909037.

[6]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  Luiz A. Baccalá,et al.  Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  Raffaello Furlan,et al.  Quantifying the strength of the linear causal coupling in closed loop interacting cardiovascular variability signals , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  R. H. Kwong,et al.  Detection of feedback in the central nervous system using system identification techniques , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[10]  Luca Faes,et al.  Surrogate data analysis for assessing the significance of the coherence function , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Katarzyna J. Blinowska,et al.  Determination of EEG activity propagation: pair-wise versus multichannel estimate , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Luca Faes,et al.  Exploring directionality in spontaneous heart period and systolic pressure variability interactions in humans: implications in the evaluation of baroreflex gain. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[13]  Régine Le Bouquin-Jeannès,et al.  Linear and nonlinear causality between signals: methods, examples and neurophysiological applications , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[14]  G. Nollo,et al.  Experimental approach for testing the uncoupling between cardiovascular variability series , 2002, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[15]  P. Rossini,et al.  Sources of cortical rhythms in adults during physiological aging: A multicentric EEG study , 2006, Human brain mapping.