Integration with Visual Perception—Research on the Usability of a Data Visualization Interface Layout in Zero-Carbon Parks Based on Eye-Tracking Technology

With the continued application of data visualization technology in sustainable development, the construction of carbon emission monitoring platforms is becoming increasingly popular in industrial parks. However, there are many kinds of such interfaces, the usability of which remains unclear. Therefore, in order to explore the usability of current carbon emission visualization interfaces in parks and put forward humanized optimization strategies for their subsequent design, this study used eye-tracking technology to analyze the data readability of six types of layouts from three aspects of visual perception features: integrity, understandability, and selectivity. Quantitative data from eye movement experiments and visual perception characteristics were evaluated using a Likert scale in an analysis of different layouts, and the correlation data between three visual perception characteristics and the readability of different layout data were obtained using an SPSS tool. The results show that, compared with a layout containing 3D graphics, the pure data type of interface has a shorter task completion time and higher readability; however, it provides fewer choices for users and is less interesting. In addition, there is a significant negative correlation between integrity and task completion time; the more complete the interface layout, the shorter the task completion time. In summary, a certain correlation was found between visual perception characteristics and the readability of interface layout using this method. At the same time, the advantages and disadvantages of different interface layouts were also analyzed, and more humanized optimization directions and strategies were devised. This is vital for aiding subsequent research on the influence of specific layout elements to optimize visualization interfaces that display carbon emission data.

[1]  Li-Dan Kuang,et al.  Siamese visual tracking based on criss-cross attention and improved head network , 2023, Multim. Tools Appl..

[2]  Xinyao Guo,et al.  A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Aviation Carbon Emissions Studies , 2023, Sustainability.

[3]  Jie Hu,et al.  The influence of target layout and target graphic type on searching performance based on eye-tracking technology , 2023, Frontiers in Psychology.

[4]  K. Orehounig,et al.  Evaluating energy flexibility requirements for high shares of variable renewable energy: A heuristic approach , 2023, Energy.

[5]  Yuantao Chen,et al.  FFTI: Image inpainting algorithm via features fusion and two-steps inpainting , 2023, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[6]  Yiqi Xiao,et al.  The effects of graphical encodings on reading performance of the data chart displayed on the periphery of attention , 2023, Displays.

[7]  I. Bąk,et al.  Online Store Aesthetics Impact Efficacy of Product Recommendations and Highlighting , 2022, Sensors.

[8]  A. Trappey,et al.  Using Machine Learning Language Models to Generate Innovation Knowledge Graphs for Patent Mining , 2022, Applied Sciences.

[9]  Jiaqi Wang,et al.  A survey on emotional visualization and visual analysis , 2022, Journal of Visualization.

[10]  Wei Wang,et al.  3D Space Layout Design of Holographic Command Cabin Information Display in Mixed Reality Environment Based on HoloLens 2 , 2022, Brain sciences.

[11]  D. Kyritsis,et al.  Emission Quantification via Passive Infrared Optical Gas Imaging: A Review , 2022, Energies.

[12]  Lace M. K. Padilla,et al.  The Science of Visual Data Communication: What Works , 2021, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[13]  Jiman Park,et al.  GIS-Enabled Digital Twin System for Sustainable Evaluation of Carbon Emissions: A Case Study of Jeonju City, South Korea , 2020 .

[14]  Kalliopi Chatzipanagiotou,et al.  Pictorial content, sequence of conflicting online reviews and consumer decision-making: The stimulus-organism-response model revisited , 2020, Journal of Business Research.

[15]  Jiuping Xu,et al.  Technological paradigm-based approaches towards challenges and policy shifts for sustainable wind energy development , 2020 .

[16]  Hao Yang,et al.  Cyber-physical system-based real-time monitoring and visualization of greenhouse gas emissions of prefabricated construction , 2020 .

[17]  Richard S. Middleton,et al.  SimCCS: An open-source tool for optimizing CO2 capture, transport, and storage infrastructure , 2020, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  Lu Sun,et al.  An emissions accounting framework for industrial parks in China , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[19]  Jose Antonio Diego-Mas,et al.  User-interfaces layout optimization using eye-tracking, mouse movements and genetic algorithms. , 2019, Applied ergonomics.

[20]  Xianbing Liu,et al.  Visualisation approach and economic incentives toward low carbon practices in households: A survey study in Hyogo, Japan , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[21]  Yan Jia,et al.  Data-driven regionalization for analyzing the spatiotemporal characteristics of air quality in China , 2019, Atmospheric Environment.

[22]  Abdullah Bin Gani,et al.  Real-Time Carbon Dioxide Monitoring Based on IoT & Cloud Technologies , 2019, ICSCA.

[23]  Xiaodi Huang,et al.  NGD: Filtering Graphs for Visual Analysis , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Big Data.

[24]  Chao Mao,et al.  Greenhouse gas emission monitoring system for manufacturing prefabricated components , 2018, Automation in Construction.

[25]  Azam Majooni,et al.  An eye-tracking study on the effect of infographic structures on viewer’s comprehension and cognitive load , 2018, Inf. Vis..

[26]  Habib M. Alshuwaikhat,et al.  Spatial Estimation and Visualization of CO2 Emissions for Campus Sustainability: The Case of King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Saudi Arabia , 2017 .

[27]  Yu Chen,et al.  Effect of user interface layout on the operators’ mental workload in emergency operating procedures in nuclear power plants , 2017 .

[28]  Nils Brandt,et al.  Assessing the impact of real-time price visualization on residential electricity consumption, costs, and carbon emissions , 2017 .

[29]  Yuhua Liu,et al.  Evaluation of graph layout methods based on visual perception , 2016, ICVGIP '16.

[30]  Jun Sun,et al.  Generating Orthorectified Multi-Perspective 2.5D Maps to Facilitate Web GIS-Based Visualization and Exploitation of Massive 3D City Models , 2016, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[31]  Lei Tian,et al.  Teaching Reform of Web Page Design Based on Computer Vision , 2016 .

[32]  Alzbeta Brychtova,et al.  An Empirical User Study for Measuring the Influence of Colour Distance and Font Size in Map Reading Using Eye Tracking , 2016 .

[33]  Pei-Chann Chang,et al.  Development of a cloud-based service framework for energy conservation in a sustainable intelligent transportation system , 2015 .

[34]  Yan Chen,et al.  An Analysis of the Influence of Visual Perception Characteristics to the Usability Design of Infants Aapplication Interface , 2013 .

[35]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Eye tracking for visualization evaluation: Reading values on linear versus radial graphs , 2011, Inf. Vis..

[36]  Lisa A. Best,et al.  Extraneous information and graph comprehension: Implications for effective design choices , 2009 .

[37]  Christopher G. Healey,et al.  Visual Perception and Mixed-Initiative Interaction for Assisted Visualization Design , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[38]  Yi Liu,et al.  Massive-scale carbon pollution control and biological fusion under big data context , 2021, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[39]  Marcello Pellicciari,et al.  Exploring the potential of Operator 4.0 interface and monitoring , 2020, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[40]  Yi Su,et al.  The Green Vehicle Routing Problem From a Smart Logistics Perspective , 2020, IEEE Access.

[41]  D. Timothy,et al.  Quantifying aboveground biomass in African environments : A review of the trade-offs between sensor estimation accuracy and costs , 2016 .