The Methods and Experiments of Shape Measurement for Off-Axis Conic Aspheric Surface

The off-axis conic aspheric surface is widely used as a component in modern optical systems. It is critical for this kind of surface to obtain the real accuracy of the shape during optical processing. As is widely known, the null test is an effective method to measure the shape accuracy with high precision. Therefore, three shape measurement methods of null test including auto-collimation, single computer-generated hologram (CGH), and hybrid compensation are presented in detail in this research. Although the various methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, all methods need a special auxiliary component to accomplish the measurement. In the paper, an off-axis paraboloid (OAP) was chosen to be measured using the three methods along with auxiliary components of their own and it was shown that the experimental results involved in peak-to-valley (PV), root-mean-square (RMS), and shape distribution from three methods were consistent. As a result, the correctness and effectiveness of these three measurement methods were confirmed, which are very useful in engineering.

[1]  J. Wyant,et al.  Computer generated holograms for testing optical elements. , 1971, Applied optics.

[2]  James H Burge,et al.  Null test for a highly paraboloidal mirror. , 2004, Applied optics.

[3]  Ailing Tian,et al.  Measurement investigation of an off-axis aspheric surface via a hybrid compensation method. , 2018, Applied optics.

[4]  Kwijong Park,et al.  Accuracy Assessment for Measuring Surface Figures of Large Aspheric Mirrors , 2009 .

[5]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Analysis of phase sensitivity for binary computer-generated holograms. , 2006, Applied optics.

[6]  James H. Burge,et al.  Fabrication and testing of 4.2m off-axis aspheric primary mirror of Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[7]  Xu Wang,et al.  Test of an off-axis asphere by subaperture stitching interferometry , 2009, International Symposium on Advanced Optical Manufacturing and Testing Technologies (AOMATT).

[8]  Moo-Young Chun,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of test methods for aspheric off-axis mirrors , 2011 .

[9]  Min Wang,et al.  CGH null test design and fabrication for off-axis aspherical mirror tests , 2006, International Optical Design Conference.

[10]  Jan Burke,et al.  Null test of an off-axis parabolic mirror. I. Configuration with spherical reference wave and flat return surface. , 2009, Optics express.

[11]  Yongtian Wang,et al.  Computer generated hologram null compensator for optical metrology of a freeform surface , 2010 .

[12]  Pengfei Yang,et al.  A practical method for determining the accuracy of computer-generated holograms for off-axis aspheric surfaces , 2016 .

[13]  A. Meinel,et al.  Optical Testing Of Off-Axis Parabolic Segments Without Auxiliary Optical Elements , 1989 .

[14]  Feifei Gu,et al.  Non-null testing for aspheric surfaces using elliptical sub-aperture stitching technique. , 2014, Optics express.

[15]  张学军 Zhang Xue-jun,et al.  Test of off-axis aspheric surfaces with CGH , 2011 .

[16]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Fabrication error analysis and experimental demonstration for computer-generated holograms. , 2007, Applied optics.

[17]  Feng Yan,et al.  Experimental study of an off-axis three mirror anastigmatic system with wavefront coding technology. , 2012, Applied optics.

[18]  James H. Burge,et al.  Design and analysis for interferometric measurements of the GMT primary mirror segments , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[19]  Xie Yi Design and Fabrication of Twin Computer-generated Holograms for Testing Concave Aspherical Surfaces , 2008 .

[20]  Haobo Cheng,et al.  Measurement for off-axis aspheric mirror using off-axis annular subaperture stitching interferometry: theory and applications , 2015 .