BACKGROUND
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is one of the leading causes of pregnancy-related death. Prenatal health care providers can offer critical screening and support to pregnant people who experience IPV. During the COVID-19 shelter-in-place order, mobile apps may offer such people the opportunity to continue receiving screening and support services.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to examine cases of IPV that were reported on a prenatal care app before and during the implementation of COVID-19 shelter-in-place mandates.
METHODS
The number of patients who underwent voluntary IPV screening and the incidence rate of IPV were determined by using a prenatal care app that was disseminated to patients from a single, large health care system. We compared the IPV screening frequencies and IPV incidence rates of patients who started using the app before the COVID-19 shelter-in-place order, to those of patients who started using the app during the shelter-in-place order.
RESULTS
We found 552 patients who started using the app within 60 days prior to the enforcement of the shelter-in-place order, and 407 patients who used the app at the start of shelter-in-place enforcement until the order was lifted. The incidence rates of voluntary IPV screening for new app users during the two time periods were similar (before sheltering in place: 252/552, 46%; during sheltering in place: 163/407, 40%). The overall use of the IPV screening tool increased during the shelter-in-place order. A slight, nonsignificant increase in the incidence of physical, sexual, and psychological violence during the shelter-in-place order was found across all app users (P=.56). Notably, none of the patients who screened positively for IPV had mentions of IPV in their medical charts.
CONCLUSIONS
App-based screening for IPV is feasible during times when in-person access to health care providers is limited. Our results suggest that the incidence of IPV slightly increased during the shelter-in-place order. App-based screening may also address the needs of those who are unwilling or unable to share their IPV experiences with their health care provider.
[1]
Chuka Nestor Emezue.
Digital or Digitally Delivered Responses to Domestic and Intimate Partner Violence During COVID-19
,
2020,
JMIR public health and surveillance.
[2]
M. Mckenney,et al.
Alarming trends in US domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic
,
2020,
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.
[3]
Louise Isham,et al.
The pandemic paradox: The consequences of COVID‐19 on domestic violence
,
2020,
Journal of clinical nursing.
[4]
K. Theall,et al.
Homicide During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period in Louisiana, 2016-2017.
,
2020,
JAMA pediatrics.
[5]
Jacquelyn C. Campbell,et al.
The Longitudinal Impact of an Internet Safety Decision Aid for Abused Women.
,
2017,
American journal of preventive medicine.
[6]
K. Hegarty,et al.
Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings.
,
2015,
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[7]
P. Scribano,et al.
The Effects of Intimate Partner Violence Before, During, and After Pregnancy in Nurse Visited First Time Mothers
,
2013,
Maternal and Child Health Journal.
[8]
Ko Ling Chan,et al.
Pregnancy and Intimate Partner Violence: Risk Factors, Severity, and Health Effects
,
2011,
Violence against women.
[9]
Judy C. Chang,et al.
Partner violence screening in mental health.
,
2011,
General hospital psychiatry.
[10]
C. Renzetti.
Intimate Partner Violence
,
2009
.
[11]
L. Kupper,et al.
Physical Abuse of Women Before, During, and After Pregnancy
,
2001
.
[12]
D. Cheng,et al.
Enhanced surveillance for pregnancy-associated mortality--Maryland, 1993-1998.
,
2001,
JAMA.
[13]
J. Earp,et al.
Beyond the Measurement Trap
,
1999
.
[14]
Prevalence of violence against pregnant women
,
1996
.