While the positive effects of peer tutoring in a face-to-face classroom are well documented, studies of computer-aided peer tutoring are less common. However, such exercises have the potential to introduce additional student-student interaction in distance, online and blended courses. Additionally, technology can provide both students and instructors with unprecedented amounts of information related to tutor competency and methods. With these ideas in mind, we have developed a web-based peer-tutoring system called Opal (Online Peer-Assisted Learning) for use in problem-based undergraduate courses. Tutoring interactions on Opal use problems as both contexts for discussion and enforcers of tutor competency-that is, each interaction is based on a single problem, and students must demonstrate competency by answering the problem correctly on a computer before they become eligible to teach it. Based on social network analysis methods and a student assessment of learning gains survey, the introduction of this method of peer tutoring has had a positive effect on student-student interaction and student learning in our course and may have broad implications for peer tutoring in courses that involve digital problem solving as a key component. Practitioner Notes What is already known about this topic Traditional peer tutoring improves student motivation, learning and persistence and has a positive effect on student-student interaction., Reciprocal peer-tutoring designs, in which students tutor one another without defined tutor and tutee roles, benefit from structured designs with concrete rewards., Tutor competency is a significant issue for peer-tutoring programs, as students respond negatively when their tutors are unqualified to teach., What this paper adds Tracking and facilitating peer-tutoring interactions through the web is possible using a website we have developed., Within our system, tutoring eligibility is tied to digital problem solving (we call this approach 'gated'). The digitally gated approach maximizes tutor competency without significant instructor labor., Use of the system improved student-student interaction in our course and helped facilitate student learning, as measured by the Student Assessment of Learning Gains survey., Implications for practice and/or policy Courses involving significant amounts of digital problem solving may benefit from peer-tutoring exercises, particularly with respect to student-student interactions., Web-based interfaces for peer tutoring provide unprecedented tracking capabilities and allow instructors to structure peer tutoring exercises in new ways with minimal effort., Instructors should look to technology not just as a means for conveying content, but also as a way to connect students to one another. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
[1]
Scott E. Lewis,et al.
Retention and Reform: An Evaluation of Peer-Led Team Learning
,
2011
.
[2]
Sheng-Yi Wu,et al.
Analyzing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of an online synchronous collaborative discussion instructional activity using an instant messaging tool: A case study
,
2011,
Comput. Educ..
[3]
Rebecca Graves Smith.
Integrating Computer-Based Instruction and Peer Tutoring
,
1997
.
[4]
Mary Lou Kata.
Online Student Cohorts' Experiences of Interaction: A Comparison of Online and Traditional Student Cohorts' Experiences of Interaction that Affect Learning and Persistence.
,
2009
.
[5]
A. Derese,et al.
PerSIST: A PAL system for clinical skills training: A planning and implementation framework: Guide Supplement 30.8 – Practical application
,
2010,
Medical teacher.
[6]
Martin Valcke,et al.
Cross-age peer tutors in asynchronous discussion groups: Exploring the impact of three types of tutor training on patterns in tutor support and on tutor characteristics
,
2010,
Comput. Educ..
[7]
David R. Arendale,et al.
Understanding the supplemental instruction model
,
1994
.
[8]
Lydia T. Tien,et al.
Implementation of a Peer-Led Team Learning Instructional Approach in an Undergraduate Organic Chemistry Course.
,
2002
.
[9]
Robert B. Grossman,et al.
EPOCH: An Organic Chemistry Homework Program that Offers Response-Specific Feedback to Students.
,
2006
.
[10]
Vincent Tinto,et al.
Classrooms as Communities: Exploring the Educational Character of Student Persistence.
,
1997
.
[11]
William J. Fremouw,et al.
Peer versus Professional Models for Study Skills Training.
,
1978
.
[12]
B. Bloom.
The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring
,
1984
.
[13]
David W. Johnson,et al.
Ability and Task Difficulty in Cognitive Psychology
,
1981
.
[14]
M. Goldschmid,et al.
Peer teaching in higher education: A review
,
1976
.
[15]
J. Fantuzzo,et al.
Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on academic achievement and psychological adjustment: A component analysis.
,
1989
.
[16]
Dejano T Sobral,et al.
Cross‐year peer tutoring experience in a medical school: conditions and outcomes for student tutors
,
2002,
Medical education.
[17]
R. Hanneman.
Introduction to Social Network Methods
,
2001
.
[18]
Nancy A. McKellar.
Behaviors Used in Peer Tutoring
,
1986
.
[19]
T. Anderson.
Getting the Mix Right Again: An Updated and Theoretical Rationale for Interaction
,
2003
.
[20]
Stefan Hrastinski,et al.
The potential of synchronous communication to enhance participation in online discussions: A case study of two e-learning courses
,
2008,
Inf. Manag..