Multimedia metadata mapping: towards helping developers in their integration task

The recent growth of multimedia in our lives requires an extensive use of metadata for multimedia management. Consequently, many metadata standards have appeared. Using these standards has become very complicated since they have been developed by independent communities. The content and context are usually described using several metadata standards. Accordingly, a multimedia user must be able to interpret all these standards. In this context, several metadata integration techniques have been proposed in order to deal with this challenge. These integrations are made by domain experts which is costly and time-consuming. This paper presents a new system for a semi-automatic integration of multimedia metadata. This system will automatically map between metadata needed by the user and those encoded in different formats. The integration process makes use of several types of information: XML Schema entity names, their corresponding comments as well as the hierarchical features of XML Schema. Our experimental results demonstrate the integration benefits of the proposed system.

[1]  C. Fellbaum An Electronic Lexical Database , 1998 .

[2]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  Similarity flooding: a versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching , 2002, Proceedings 18th International Conference on Data Engineering.

[3]  Jane Hunter,et al.  Enhancing the semantic interoperability of multimedia through a core ontology , 2003, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[4]  Timos K. Sellis,et al.  A methodology for clustering XML documents by structure , 2006, Inf. Syst..

[5]  Pradeep Ravikumar,et al.  A Comparison of String Distance Metrics for Name-Matching Tasks , 2003, IIWeb.

[6]  Ted Pedersen,et al.  Using Measures of Semantic Relatedness for Word Sense Disambiguation , 2003, CICLing.

[7]  Mong-Li Lee,et al.  XClust: clustering XML schemas for effective integration , 2002, CIKM '02.

[8]  Charu C. Aggarwal,et al.  Xproj: a framework for projected structural clustering of xml documents , 2007, KDD '07.

[9]  Elke A. Rundensteiner,et al.  Automating the transformation of XML documents , 2001, WIDM '01.

[10]  Wolfgang Klas,et al.  A survey of techniques for achieving metadata interoperability , 2010, CSUR.

[11]  J. Davenport Editor , 1960 .

[12]  Pradeep Ravikumar,et al.  Adaptive Name Matching in Information Integration , 2003, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[13]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  OWL Web ontology language overview , 2004 .

[14]  Samir Amir Un système d'intégration de métadonnées dédiées au multimédia , 2009, INFORSID.

[15]  Chabane Djeraba,et al.  A Semantic Approach to Metadata Management in Sensor Systems , 2009 .

[16]  Kurt Sandkuhl,et al.  A Survey of Exploiting WordNet in Ontology Matching , 2008, IFIP AI.

[17]  C. M. Sperberg-McQueen,et al.  Extensible Markup Language (XML) , 1997, World Wide Web J..

[18]  Ioan Marius Bilasco,et al.  Semantics for intelligent delivery of multimedia content , 2010, SAC '10.

[19]  Florence Sèdes,et al.  Integrating Heterogeneous Metadata into a Distributed Multimedia Information System , 2009 .

[20]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  COMA - A System for Flexible Combination of Schema Matching Approaches , 2002, VLDB.

[21]  Aida Boukottaya,et al.  Schema matching for transforming structured documents , 2005, DocEng '05.

[22]  David Carmel,et al.  Searching XML documents via XML fragments , 2003, SIGIR.

[23]  C. M. Sperberg-McQueen,et al.  Extensible markup language , 1997 .

[24]  Elisa Bertino,et al.  Measuring the structural similarity among XML documents and DTDs , 2006, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[25]  Jane Hunter,et al.  Towards a Core Ontology for Information Integration , 2003, J. Digit. Inf..

[26]  Michael E. Lesk,et al.  Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionaries: how to tell a pine cone from an ice cream cone , 1986, SIGDOC '86.

[27]  Luciano Serafini,et al.  Semantic Coordination: A New Approach and an Application , 2003, SEMWEB.

[28]  Arnon Rosenthal,et al.  eTuner: tuning schema matching software using synthetic scenarios , 2007, The VLDB Journal.

[29]  Chabane Djeraba,et al.  Mathematical Tools for Data Mining: Set Theory, Partial Orders, Combinatorics , 2008, Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing.

[30]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.

[31]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  Generic Schema Matching with Cupid , 2001, VLDB.

[32]  Roberto García,et al.  Semantic Integration and Retrieval of Multimedia Metadata , 2005, SemAnnot@ISWC.

[33]  Chrisa Tsinaraki,et al.  Integration of OWL Ontologies in MPEG-7 and TV-Anytime Compliant Semantic Indexing , 2004, CAiSE.

[34]  Susanne Boll,et al.  Multimedia Vocabularies on the Semantic Web , 2007 .

[35]  Chabane Djeraba,et al.  Towards a Unified Multimedia Metadata Management Solution , 2012 .