Observers’ performance at evaluating truthfulness when provided with comparable truth or small talk baselines

Research has shown that the comparable truth baseline technique outperforms the small talk with respect to the elicitation of cues to deception. However, their impact on observers’ accuracy has not been evaluated yet. In this experiment, participants (N = 74) watched ten interviews where senders either lied or told the truth about a set of tasks. Half of the interviews were conducted with a comparable truth baseline, the other half with a small talk baseline. As predicted, results showed that observers in the comparable truth baseline condition outperformed participants in the small talk baseline condition in terms of total accuracy rates. The article sheds light on the impact of the two baseline techniques in distinguishing truth-tellers from liars and discourages the use of a small talk baseline. It also provides insights for future studies.

[1]  G. Miller,et al.  Familiarity and lie detection: A replication and extension , 1982 .

[2]  A. Vrij.  Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities , 2008 .

[3]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  The Accuracy-Confidence Correlation in the Detection of Deception , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[4]  A. Vrij,et al.  Using the Reverse Order Technique with Non‐Native Speakers or Through an Interpreter , 2016 .

[5]  A. Vrij,et al.  Drop the Small Talk When Establishing Baseline Behaviour in Interviews: Establishing baseline behaviour in interviews , 2014 .

[6]  A. Vrij,et al.  Have you made up your story? The effect of suspicion and liars' strategies on reality monitoring , 2010 .

[7]  Christian A. Meissner,et al.  Does Training Improve the Detection of Deception? A Meta-Analysis , 2016, Commun. Res..

[8]  P. Granhag,et al.  The Strategic Use of Evidence Technique , 2014 .

[9]  Zarah Vernham,et al.  Teenage offenders’ ability to detect deception in their peers , 2016 .

[10]  Barry S. Cooper,et al.  Applied Issues in Investigative Interviewing, Eyewitness Memory, and Credibility Assessment , 2013 .

[11]  A. Vrij,et al.  Imposing cognitive load to elicit cues to deceit: inducing the reverse order technique naturally , 2012 .

[12]  Terry Engelberg,et al.  Police questioning techniques in tape recorded interviews with criminal suspects , 1993 .

[13]  Thomas Hugh Feeley,et al.  Baseline Familiarity in Lie Detection. , 1995 .

[14]  Marino Bonaiuto,et al.  THE IMPACT OF DECEPTION AND SUSPICION ON DIFFERENT HAND MOVEMENTS , 2006 .

[15]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  Detecting Deception: Current Challenges and Cognitive Approaches , 2014 .

[16]  A. Vrij,et al.  Detecting deception through small talk and comparable truth baselines , 2018 .

[17]  Galit Nahari,et al.  Exploiting liars' verbal strategies by examining the verifiability of details , 2014 .

[18]  A. Vrij,et al.  Drop the Small Talk When Establishing Baseline Behaviour in Interviews , 2014 .

[19]  H Stanislaw,et al.  Calculation of signal detection theory measures , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[20]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Accuracy of Deception Judgments , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[21]  Kevin R. Colwell,et al.  Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception: An Example of the New Paradigm of Differential Recall Enhancement , 2013 .

[22]  C. F. Bond,et al.  Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  A. Vrij.  A Cognitive Approach to Lie Detection , 2014 .

[24]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  A cognitive approach to lie detection: A meta‐analysis , 2017 .

[25]  Gerald R. Miller,et al.  The Truth-Deception Attribution: Effects of Familiarity on the Ability of Observers to Detect Deception. , 1980 .

[26]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Interviewing to detect deception , 2014 .

[27]  A. Vrij.  Baselining as a Lie Detection Method , 2016 .

[28]  Saul M. Kassin,et al.  “He's guilty!”: Investigator Bias in Judgments of Truth and Deception , 2002, Law and human behavior.

[29]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked , 2012 .

[30]  A. Vrij,et al.  Using the verifiability lie detection approach in an insurance claim setting , 2016 .

[31]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  Cues to deception. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  A. Vrij,et al.  Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: the case of a convicted murderer , 2001 .

[33]  A. Memon,et al.  Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID): an integrated system of investigative interviewing and detecting deception , 2007 .