Failure to avoid rutin diets results in altered food utilization and reduced growth rate of Manduca sexta larvae

The possibility of avoidance of and dietary self‐selection relative to the flavonol rutin was examined for third instar Manduca sexta for two thermal regimes and for larvae previously reared on plain or rutin diet. Temperature affected all of the performance indices examined, except efficiency of conversion of digested food. Significant interactive effects between temperature and diet occurred for relative consumption rate, relative growth rate and the food utilization efficiencies. For example, at the warm daytime temperature, relative growth rate prior to head capsule slippage was lower for caterpillars previously reared on rutin diet compared to those reared on plain diet. In contrast, at the cool daytime temperature, the relative growth rates were similar for caterpillars reared on plain diet and on 6 μmoles rutin diet. Consequently, in some treatments (5 of 12), caterpillars with a history of rutin in their diet had lower relative growth rates than those experiencing rutin for the first time. Despite rutin's impact on food utilization indices and negative effect on relative growth rate, the caterpillars did not avoid rutin nor was there evidence of regulation of the intake of rutin. The lack of metabolic feedback is discussed.

[1]  N. Stamp,et al.  Use of dietary rutin to study molt initiation in Manduca sexta larvae , 1993 .

[2]  N. Stamp,et al.  Interactive effects of temperature and concentration of the flavonol rutin on growth, molt and food utilization of Manduca sexta caterpillars , 1992 .

[3]  G. Milliken,et al.  Modeling Differences in Insect Developmental times between Constant and Fluctuating Temperatures , 1991 .

[4]  E. Bernays,et al.  Rutin: a phagostimulant for the polyphagous acridid Schistocerca americana , 1991 .

[5]  W. Thomas Modeling the effect of temperature and gossypol concentration on developmental rate of Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera : noctuidae) , 1991 .

[6]  N. Stamp,et al.  Variable quantities of toxic diet cause different degrees of compensatory and inhibitory responses by juvenile praying mantids , 1990 .

[7]  Nancy E. Stamp,et al.  VARIATION IN FOOD QUALITY AND TEMPERATURE CONSTRAIN FORAGING OF GREGARIOUS CATERPILLARS , 1990 .

[8]  E. Bernays,et al.  The relative insensitivity of Manduca sexta larvae to non‐host plant secondary compounds , 1990 .

[9]  G. Waldbauer,et al.  Dietary self‐selection by Heliothis zea larvae: roles of metabolic feedback and chemosensory stimuli , 1989 .

[10]  G. Wheeler,et al.  Compensatory increases in food consumption and utilization efficiencies by velvetbean caterpillars mitigate impact of diluted diets on growth , 1989 .

[11]  W. G. Yendol,et al.  Relationship between susceptibility of gypsy moth larvae (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) to a baculovirus and host plant foliage constituents , 1988 .

[12]  E. Bernays,et al.  On the Evolution of Host Specificity in Phytophagous Arthropods , 1988 .

[13]  C. F. Reichelderfer,et al.  Three trophic level interactions: allelochemicals, Manduca sexta (L.) , and Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki Berliner , 1988 .

[14]  P. Barbosa Natural enemies and herbivore-plant interactions:influence of plant allelochemicals and host specificity , 1988 .

[15]  F. Hanson,et al.  Differentiation of roles of chemosensory organs in food discrimination among host and non‐host plants by larvae of the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta , 1987 .

[16]  F. Hanson,et al.  Feeding responses to solanaceous allelochemicals by larvae of the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta , 1987 .

[17]  S. Heydon,et al.  Nutrient self-selection by the omnivorous cockroach Supella longipalpa. , 1987 .

[18]  L. Brattsten Fate of Ingested Plant Allelochemicals in Herbivorous Insects , 1986 .

[19]  S. Friedman,et al.  Self-Selection of an Optimal Nutrient Mix from Defined Diets by Larvae of the Corn Earworm, Heliothis zea (Boddie) , 1984, Physiological Zoology.

[20]  E. Bernays,et al.  A study of behavioural habituation to a feeding deterrent in nymphs of Schistocerca gregaria , 1984 .

[21]  S. Duffey,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of chlorogenic acid and rutin in larvae of Heliothis zea , 1983 .

[22]  E. Bernays,et al.  Plant tannins and insect herbivores: an appraisal , 1981 .

[23]  L. Schoonhoven Chemical mediators between plants and phytophagous insects , 1981 .

[24]  C. Jones,et al.  Some allelochemicals of Pteridium aquilinum and their involvement in resistance to Pieris brassicae , 1979 .

[25]  J. Harborne Variation in and Functional Significance of Phenolic Conjugation in Plants , 1979 .

[26]  R. Chapman,et al.  Deterrent chemicals as a basis of oligophagy in Locusta migratoria (L.) , 1977 .

[27]  T. Shaver,et al.  Effect of Flavonoid Pigments and Gossypol on Growth and Development of the Bollworm, Tobacco Budworm, and Pink Bollworm , 1969 .

[28]  A. A. Guerra,et al.  Feeding Stimulants from Plants for Larvae of the Tobacco Budworm and Bollworm , 1969 .

[29]  G. Waldbauer The Consumption and Utilization of Food by Insects , 1968 .

[30]  S. Wender,et al.  Identification of rutin and isoquercitrin in cottonseed , 1959 .