Identifying specific protein interaction partners using quantitative mass spectrometry and bead proteomes

The identification of interaction partners in protein complexes is a major goal in cell biology. Here we present a reliable affinity purification strategy to identify specific interactors that combines quantitative SILAC-based mass spectrometry with characterization of common contaminants binding to affinity matrices (bead proteomes). This strategy can be applied to affinity purification of either tagged fusion protein complexes or endogenous protein complexes, illustrated here using the well-characterized SMN complex as a model. GFP is used as the tag of choice because it shows minimal nonspecific binding to mammalian cell proteins, can be quantitatively depleted from cell extracts, and allows the integration of biochemical protein interaction data with in vivo measurements using fluorescence microscopy. Proteins binding nonspecifically to the most commonly used affinity matrices were determined using quantitative mass spectrometry, revealing important differences that affect experimental design. These data provide a specificity filter to distinguish specific protein binding partners in both quantitative and nonquantitative pull-down and immunoprecipitation experiments.

[1]  Matthias Mann,et al.  High confidence determination of specific protein-protein interactions using quantitative mass spectrometry. , 2008, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[2]  A. Heck,et al.  Quantitative Proteomics Reveals Regulation of Dynamic Components within TATA-binding Protein (TBP) Transcription Complexes*S , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[3]  D. Alessi,et al.  Control of AMPK-related kinases by USP9X and atypical Lys(29)/Lys(33)-linked polyubiquitin chains. , 2008, The Biochemical journal.

[4]  Akhilesh Pandey,et al.  Quantitative proteomics using stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[5]  M. Cristina Cardoso,et al.  A Versatile Nanotrap for Biochemical and Functional Studies with Fluorescent Fusion Proteins*S , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[6]  Lan Huang,et al.  Identifying Dynamic Interactors of Protein Complexes by Quantitative Mass Spectrometry*S , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[7]  M. Mann,et al.  Is Proteomics the New Genomics? , 2007, Cell.

[8]  G. Dreyfuss,et al.  Molecular Functions of the SMN Complex , 2007, Journal of child neurology.

[9]  L. Trinkle-Mulcahy,et al.  Emerging roles of nuclear protein phosphatases , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[10]  Utz Fischer,et al.  A Comprehensive Interaction Map of the Human Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) Complex* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  M. Mann,et al.  Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture for quantitative proteomics. , 2007, Methods in molecular biology.

[12]  M. Mann,et al.  Protein interaction screening by quantitative immunoprecipitation combined with knockdown (QUICK) , 2006, Nature Methods.

[13]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Mass Spectrometry and Protein Analysis , 2006, Science.

[14]  J. Rappsilber,et al.  Gemin8 Is a Novel Component of the Survival Motor Neuron Complex and Functions in Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein Assembly* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  Matthias Mann,et al.  Repo-Man recruits PP1γ to chromatin and is essential for cell viability , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  M. Mann,et al.  Parts per Million Mass Accuracy on an Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer via Lock Mass Injection into a C-trap*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[17]  Ileana M Cristea,et al.  Fluorescent Proteins as Proteomic Probes*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[18]  B. Chait,et al.  I-DIRT, a general method for distinguishing between specific and nonspecific protein interactions. , 2005, Journal of proteome research.

[19]  J. Rappsilber,et al.  Unrip is a component of SMN complexes active in snRNP assembly , 2005, FEBS letters.

[20]  Utz Fischer,et al.  Unique Sm core structure of U7 snRNPs: assembly by a specialized SMN complex and the role of a new component, Lsm11, in histone RNA processing. , 2003, Genes & development.

[21]  A. Lamond,et al.  Cajal body proteins SMN and Coilin show differential dynamic behaviour in vivo , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[22]  Blagoy Blagoev,et al.  A proteomics strategy to elucidate functional protein-protein interactions applied to EGF signaling , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  The study of macromolecular complexes by quantitative proteomics , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[24]  J. Yong,et al.  Essential Role for the SMN Complex in the Specificity of snRNP Assembly , 2002, Science.

[25]  Utz Fischer,et al.  Assisted RNP assembly: SMN and PRMT5 complexes cooperate in the formation of spliceosomal UsnRNPs , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[26]  Livio Pellizzoni,et al.  Identification and Characterization of Gemin7, a Novel Component of the Survival of Motor Neuron Complex* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  M. Mann,et al.  Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture, SILAC, as a Simple and Accurate Approach to Expression Proteomics* , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[28]  M. Mann,et al.  Purification of Native Survival of Motor Neurons Complexes and Identification of Gemin6 as a Novel Component* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  J. Yong,et al.  Sequence‐specific interaction of U1 snRNA with the SMN complex , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[30]  M. Mann,et al.  Gemin5, a Novel WD Repeat Protein Component of the SMN Complex That Binds Sm Proteins* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  Michael Sendtner,et al.  Specific interaction of Smn, the spinal muscular atrophy determining gene product, with hnRNP-R and gry-rbp/hnRNP-Q: a role for Smn in RNA processing in motor axons? , 2002, Human molecular genetics.

[32]  Chadwick M. Hales,et al.  Direct Interaction of the Spinal Muscular Atrophy Disease Protein SMN with the Small Nucleolar RNA-associated Protein Fibrillarin* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  A. Matera,et al.  Coilin forms the bridge between Cajal bodies and SMN, the spinal muscular atrophy protein. , 2001, Genes & development.

[34]  C. Will,et al.  Purified U7 snRNPs lack the Sm proteins D1 and D2 but contain Lsm10, a new 14 kDa Sm D1‐like protein , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[35]  J. Yong,et al.  SMN interacts with a novel family of hnRNP and spliceosomal proteins , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[36]  G. Dreyfuss,et al.  The survival of motor neurons (SMN) protein interacts with the snoRNP proteins fibrillarin and GAR1 , 2001, Current Biology.

[37]  M. Mann,et al.  A Functional Interaction between the Survival Motor Neuron Complex and RNA Polymerase II , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[38]  M. Brasch,et al.  Direct interaction of Smn with dp103, a putative RNA helicase: a role for Smn in transcription regulation? , 2000, Human molecular genetics.

[39]  A. Shevchenko,et al.  Gemin4. A novel component of the SMN complex that is found in both gems and nucleoli. , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[40]  A. Shevchenko,et al.  Gemin3: A novel DEAD box protein that interacts with SMN, the spinal muscular atrophy gene product, and is a component of gems. , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[41]  G. Dreyfuss,et al.  The Spinal Muscular Atrophy Disease Gene Product, SMN, and Its Associated Protein SIP1 Are in a Complex with Spliceosomal snRNP Proteins , 1997, Cell.

[42]  G. Dreyfuss,et al.  A novel nuclear structure containing the survival of motor neurons protein. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[43]  C. Will,et al.  Puri ® ed U 7 snRNPs lack the Sm proteins D 1 and D 2 but contain Lsm 10 , a new 14 kDa Sm D 1-like protein , 2022 .