Neural networks as a tool to predict syncope risk in the Emergency Department

Aims There is no universally accepted tool for the risk stratification of syncope patients in the Emergency Department. The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term predictive accuracy of an artificial neural network (ANN) in stratifying the risk in this patient group. Methods and results We analysed individual level data from three prospective studies, with a cumulative sample size of 1844 subjects. Each dataset was reanalysed to reduce the heterogeneity among studies defining abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) and serious outcomes according to a previous consensus. Ten variables from patient history, ECG, and the circumstances of syncope were used to train and test the neural network. Given the exploratory nature of this work, we adopted two approaches to train and validate the tool. One approach used 4/5 of the data for the training set and 1/5 for the validation set, and the other approach used 9/10 for the training set and 1/10 for the validation set. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of ANNs in identifying short-term adverse events after syncope were 95% [95% confidence interval (CI) 80-98%], 67% (95% CI 62-72%), 0.69 with the 1/5 approach and 100% (95% CI 84-100%), 79% (95% CI 72-85%), 0.78 with the 1/10 approach. Conclusion The results of our study suggest that ANNs are effective in predicting the short-term risk of patients with syncope. Prospective studies are needed in order to compare ANNs' predictive capability with existing rules and clinical judgment.

[1]  D. Morgan,et al.  Unnecessary hospitalization and related harm for patients with low-risk syncope. , 2015, JAMA internal medicine.

[2]  R. Furlan,et al.  Is hospital admission valuable in managing syncope? Results from the STePS study. , 2014, Cardiology journal.

[3]  C. Morillo,et al.  Syncope clinical management in the emergency department: a consensus from the first international workshop on syncope risk stratification in the emergency department. , 2016, European heart journal.

[4]  M. Brignole,et al.  Clinical predictors of cardiac syncope at initial evaluation in patients referred urgently to a general hospital: the EGSYS score , 2008, Heart.

[5]  C. Mangione,et al.  External validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.

[6]  R. Furlan,et al.  Short- and long-term prognosis of syncope, risk factors, and role of hospital admission: results from the STePS (Short-Term Prognosis of Syncope) study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  I. Savelieva,et al.  Syncope Unit: rationale and requirement--the European Heart Rhythm Association position statement endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2015, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[8]  I. Stiell,et al.  Priorities for emergency department syncope research. , 2014, Annals of emergency medicine.

[9]  Benjamin C. Sun,et al.  Standardized reporting guidelines for emergency department syncope risk-stratification research. , 2012, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[10]  Kenneth Sands,et al.  Predicting adverse outcomes in syncope. , 2007, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[11]  E. Hess,et al.  Outcomes in Canadian emergency department syncope patients--are we doing a good job? , 2013, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[12]  George A Wells,et al.  Derivation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with short-term serious outcomes. , 2004, Annals of emergency medicine.

[13]  Massimo Santini,et al.  Development and prospective validation of a risk stratification system for patients with syncope in the emergency department: the OESIL risk score. , 2003, European heart journal.

[14]  R. L. Kennedy,et al.  Artificial neural network models for prediction of acute coronary syndromes using clinical data from the time of presentation. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.

[15]  R. Furlan,et al.  Syncope recurrence and mortality: a systematic review. , 2015, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[16]  R. Furlan,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks and risk stratification models in Emergency Departments: The policy maker's perspective. , 2016, Health policy.

[17]  J. Iwanicki,et al.  The ROSE (Risk Stratification of Syncope in the Emergency Department) Study , 2010 .

[18]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  Introduction to neural networks , 1995, The Lancet.

[19]  Greta Falavigna,et al.  Financial ratings with scarce information: A neural network approach , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Cenker Eken,et al.  Artificial neural network in predicting craniocervical junction injury: an alternative approach to trauma patients , 2008, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[21]  R. Furlan,et al.  Syncope risk stratification tools vs clinical judgment: an individual patient data meta-analysis. , 2014, The American journal of medicine.