Admission biomarkers among patients with acute myocardial-infarction related cardiogenic shock with or without out-of-hospital cardiac arrest an exploratory study

Abstract Background Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) with or without out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have some pathophysiological differences and could potentially be considered as two individual clinical entities. Thus, there may also be differences in terms of blood borne biomarkers. Purpose To explore potential differences in concentrations of the biomarkers lactate, mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MRproADM), Copeptin, pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (proANP), Syndecan-1, soluble thrombomodulin (sTM), soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), in patients with AMICS with or without OHCA. Method Patients admitted for acute coronary angiography due to suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction were enrolled during a 1-year period. In the present study 86 patients with confirmed AMICS at admission were included. Results In the adjusted analysis OHCA patients had higher levels of lactate (p = 0.008), NGAL (p = 0.03) and sTM (p = 0.011) while the level of sST2 was lower (p = 0.029). There was little difference in 30-day mortality between the OHCA and non-OHCA groups (OHCA 37% vs. non-OHCA 38%). Conclusion AMICS patients with or without OHCA had similar 30-day mortality but differed in terms of Lactate, NGAL, sTM and sST2 levels. These findings support that non-OHCA and OHCA patients with CS could be considered as two individual clinical entities.

[1]  C. Hassager,et al.  Hemodynamic and metabolic recovery in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock is more rapid among patients presenting with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. , 2020, PloS one.

[2]  R. Frikke-Schmidt,et al.  Biomarkers predictive of late cardiogenic shock development in patients with suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction , 2020, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.

[3]  M. Emdin,et al.  Clinical and Prognostic Significance of sST2 in Heart Failure: JACC Review Topic of the Week. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  Min Joung Kim,et al.  Predictive performance of plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin for neurologic outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients treated with targeted temperature management , 2019, Medicine.

[5]  C. Hassager,et al.  Temporal trends in incidence and patient characteristics in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction from 2010 to 2017: a Danish cohort study , 2019, European journal of heart failure.

[6]  L. Bang,et al.  Lactate is a Prognostic Factor in Patients Admitted With Suspected ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2019, Shock.

[7]  C. Hassager,et al.  Plasma Concentration of Biomarkers Reflecting Endothelial Cell- and Glycocalyx Damage are Increased in Patients With Suspected ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock , 2018, Shock.

[8]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). , 2018, Global heart.

[9]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction. , 2018, The American journal of medicine.

[10]  M. Kelm,et al.  [PCI strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock : CULPRIT-SHOCK]. , 2018, Der Internist.

[11]  C. Hassager,et al.  Risk factors of late cardiogenic shock and mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients , 2018, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.

[12]  S. Zakynthinos,et al.  Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: pathological processes, biomarkers and vasopressor support, and potential therapeutic targets. , 2017, Resuscitation.

[13]  A. Mebazaa,et al.  Combined Measurement of Soluble ST2 and Amino-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Provides Early Assessment of Severity in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Coronary Syndrome , 2017, Critical care medicine.

[14]  H. Thiele,et al.  Risk Stratification for Patients in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  D. Antoniucci,et al.  A New Risk Score to Predict Long-Term Cardiac Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock and Treated With Primary Percutaneous Intervention. , 2017, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  G. Chatellier,et al.  Cardiogenic shock in intensive care units: evolution of prevalence, patient profile, management and outcomes, 1997–2012 , 2017, European journal of heart failure.

[17]  Dong Hyuk Shin,et al.  Plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as an early predicting biomarker of acute kidney injury and clinical outcomes after recovery of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. , 2016, Resuscitation.

[18]  N. Yonemoto,et al.  Characteristics and Predictors of Mortality in Patients With Cardiovascular Shock in Japan - Results From the Japanese Circulation Society Cardiovascular Shock Registry. , 2016, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[19]  D. McManus,et al.  Decade-Long Trends (2001–2011) in the Incidence and Hospital Death Rates Associated with the In-Hospital Development of Cardiogenic Shock after Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[20]  Kaleab Z. Abebe,et al.  Serum Neutrophil Gelatinase–Associated Lipocalin Predicts Survival After Resuscitation From Cardiac Arrest , 2016, Critical care medicine.

[21]  M. Orlandea,et al.  Plasma Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) – Early Biomarker for Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients , 2015, Journal of critical care medicine.

[22]  Holger Thiele,et al.  Clinical picture and risk prediction of short‐term mortality in cardiogenic shock , 2015, European journal of heart failure.

[23]  J. Januzzi,et al.  The biology of ST2: the International ST2 Consensus Panel. , 2015, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  C. Hassager,et al.  Sympathoadrenal Activation and Endothelial Damage Are Inter Correlated and Predict Increased Mortality in Patients Resuscitated after Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. A Post Hoc Sub-Study of Patients from the TTM-Trial , 2015, PloS one.

[25]  C. Hassager,et al.  Prognostic implication of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with cardiogenic shock and acute myocardial infarction. , 2014, Resuscitation.

[26]  J. Poulsen,et al.  Evaluation of NGAL TestTM on Cobas 6000 , 2014, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[27]  S. Pedersen,et al.  Acute myocardial infarction is associated with endothelial glycocalyx and cell damage and a parallel increase in circulating catecholamines , 2013, Critical Care.

[28]  G. Schuler,et al.  Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  J. Rehfeld,et al.  Measurement of the total proANP product in mammals by processing independent analysis. , 2011, Journal of immunological methods.

[30]  J. Bakker,et al.  Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin at ICU admission predicts for acute kidney injury in adult patients. , 2011, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[31]  K. Werdan,et al.  Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of infarction-related cardiogenic shock , 2011, Herz.

[32]  A. Chalkias,et al.  Pathophysiology and pathogenesis of post-resuscitation myocardial stunning , 2011, Heart Failure Reviews.

[33]  S. Ostrowski,et al.  Acute coagulopathy of trauma: balancing progressive catecholamine induced endothelial activation and damage by fluid phase anticoagulation. , 2010, Medical hypotheses.

[34]  J. Gore,et al.  Thirty-Year Trends (1975 to 2005) in the Magnitude of, Management of, and Hospital Death Rates Associated With Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Population-Based Perspective , 2009, Circulation.

[35]  R. Neumar,et al.  Consensus Process , 2022 .

[36]  Judith S. Hochman,et al.  Cardiogenic Shock: Current Concepts and Improving Outcomes , 2008, Circulation.

[37]  G. Gensini,et al.  Predictors of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock. , 2007, International journal of cardiology.

[38]  L. Køber,et al.  Diabetes mellitus and cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction , 2005, European journal of heart failure.

[39]  H. S,et al.  Early Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock , 2000 .

[40]  H. White,et al.  Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.