A validation of commonly used CFD methods applied to rotor stator mixers using PIV measurements of fluid velocity and turbulence

Abstract Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been applied extensively for studying rotor-stator mixers (RSM) in the past, both as a design-tool and in modelling mixing and emulsification. Modelling is always a balance between accuracy and computational cost. The theoretically soundest methods (i.e. fully resolved transient simulations) have often been deemed unfeasible, and the majority of previously published studies use severe simplifications (i.e. k-e models for turbulence and multiple reference frame for rotation). High quality experimental validation is in great need, but are rare, due to the lack of local fluid velocity measurement. Experimental validations of CFD on RSMs have previously been provided using laser Doppler anemometry. This study provides the first validation using particle image velocimetry, allowing for substantially higher spatial resolution than with the previously used techniques. The objective of this study is to map the possibilities and limitations of these commonly used CFD modelling approaches for RSMs. Special emphasis is put on validating the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE). Despite being the parameter used for linking CFD to mixing or dispersion models, this has not been the subject of experimental validation in previous studies. Based on the validations, a list of best practice recommendations are given (in terms of turbulence model, mesh resolution and rotation formulation). When adhering to these, the CFD model accurately captures power draw, flow number, and the detailed velocity field inside the region where mixing and dispersion takes place. The dissipation rate of TKE is captured qualitatively but underestimate experimental values. Implications in terms of limitations are discussed in detail, including estimations of accuracy implications for emulsification and mixing modelling.

[1]  F. Innings,et al.  Single droplet breakup in a rotor-stator mixer , 2018 .

[2]  A. Pacek,et al.  Flow pattern, periodicity and energy dissipation in a batch rotor–stator mixer , 2008 .

[3]  Richard V. Calabrese,et al.  Rotor–Stator Mixing Devices , 2004 .

[4]  Hans Henrik Mortensen,et al.  Experimental investigations of turbulent fragmenting stresses in a rotor-stator mixer. Part 2. Probability distributions of instantaneous stresses , 2017 .

[5]  Hans Henrik Mortensen,et al.  Local levels of dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy in a rotor–stator mixer with different stator slot widths—An experimental investigation , 2018 .

[6]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[7]  Alvin W. Nienow,et al.  Use of angle resolved PIV to estimate local specific energy dissipation rates for up- and down-pumping pitched blade agitators in a stirred tank , 2009 .

[8]  T. Shih,et al.  A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows , 1995 .

[9]  Hans Henrik Mortensen,et al.  Experimental investigations of turbulent fragmenting stresses in a rotor-stator mixer. Part 1. Estimation of turbulent stresses and comparison to breakup visualizations , 2017 .

[11]  Wei Li,et al.  LDA measurements and CFD simulations of an in‐line high shear mixer with ultrafine teeth , 2014 .

[12]  A. Pacek,et al.  The effect of scale and interfacial tension on liquid–liquid dispersion in in-line Silverson rotor–stator mixers☆ , 2013 .

[13]  B. Launder,et al.  Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure , 1975, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  Henry Kister,et al.  Understanding maldistribution in 3-pass trays , 2011 .

[15]  Firoz R. Khan Investigation of turbulent flows and instabilities in a stirred vessel using particle image velocimetry , 2005 .

[16]  Y. Liao,et al.  A literature review of theoretical models for drop and bubble breakup in turbulent dispersions , 2009 .

[17]  Wei Li,et al.  CFD analysis of flow pattern and power consumption for viscous fluids in in-line high shear mixers , 2017 .

[18]  Adam J. Kowalski,et al.  Application of test reactions to study micromixing in the rotor-stator mixer (test reactions for rotor-stator mixer) , 2013 .

[19]  W. Li,et al.  Residence time distributions of in-line high shear mixers with ultrafine teeth , 2013 .

[20]  Adam J. Kowalski,et al.  Power consumption characteristics of an in-line silverson high shear mixer , 2012 .

[21]  Adam J. Kowalski,et al.  Expression for turbulent power draw of an in-line Silverson high shear mixer , 2011 .

[22]  Andreas Håkansson,et al.  The effect of stator design on flowrate and velocity fields in a rotor-stator mixer—An experimental investigation , 2017 .

[23]  A. Pacek,et al.  The effect of stator geometry on the flow pattern and energy dissipation rate in a rotor-stator mixer , 2009 .

[24]  Thomas Danner,et al.  Emulsification in turbulent flow 1. Mean and maximum drop diameters in inertial and viscous regimes. , 2007, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[25]  Gül Özcan-Taşkin,et al.  Power and flow characteristics of three rotor-stator heads , 2011 .

[26]  Hui Meng,et al.  A large eddy PIV method for turbulence dissipation rate estimation , 2000 .

[27]  Adam J. Kowalski,et al.  Power characteristics of in-line rotor stator mixers , 2014 .

[28]  D. Wilcox Turbulence modeling for CFD , 1993 .

[29]  Lasse Rosendahl,et al.  Characteristics of batch rotor–stator mixer performance elucidated by shaft torque and angle resolved PIV measurements , 2011 .

[30]  J. Ulrich,et al.  High‐Pressure Homogenization as a Process for Emulsion Formation , 2004 .

[31]  S. Jafari,et al.  Re-coalescence of emulsion droplets during high-energy emulsification , 2008 .

[32]  Andreas Håkansson,et al.  Hydrodynamic difference between inline and batch operation of a rotor-stator mixer head - A CFD approach , 2017 .

[33]  Jo Janssen,et al.  Modelling strategies for emulsification in industrial practice , 2014 .