Masking produced by spectral uncertainty with multicomponent maskers

The first experiment examined thresholds for signals at 250, 1000, and 4000 Hz presented simultaneously with maskers that had from 1 to 100 sinusoidal components. The number of masker components remained constant throughout a block of trials, but the component frequencies were drawn at random from a 5000-Hz range for each presentation. Maskers with as few as 10 components produced more masking than maskers with up to 100 components or than broadband noise. The amount of masking decreased dramatically if the same masker occurred in both intervals of a forced-choice trial, even if the masker changed between trials. The second experiment examined whether judgments of the number of components present in a stimulus might aid signal detection. Such a strategy would not be effective, since about 50% more components are needed to discriminate between stimuli, regardless of the initial number of components. These experiments indicate that listeners sometimes are unable to use a single-filter detection strategy, even when it is advantageous to do so.

[1]  D. M. Green,et al.  Profile analysis. A different view of auditory intensity discrimination. , 1983, The American psychologist.

[2]  D L Weber Combined effect of two suppressors. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  W Richards,et al.  Quantifying sensory channels: generalizing colorimetry to orientation and texture, touch, and tones. , 1979, Sensory processes.

[5]  J. C. R. Licklider,et al.  Detection of a Pulsed Sinusoid in Noise as a Function of Frequency , 1959 .

[6]  D M Green,et al.  Signal and masker uncertainty with noise maskers of varying duration, bandwidth, and center frequency. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  C S Watson,et al.  Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. II. Selective attention and learning under various levels of stimulus uncertainty. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Willard R. Thurlow,et al.  Discrimination of Number of Simultaneously Sounding Tones , 1959 .

[9]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[10]  Irwin Pollack,et al.  Ohm's Acoustical Law and Short‐Term Auditory Memory , 1964 .

[11]  D M Green,et al.  Signal and masker uncertainty in intensity discrimination. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Joseph W. Hall,et al.  Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  C S Watson,et al.  Time course of auditory perceptual learning. , 1980, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[14]  W M Hartmann,et al.  Discrimination of spectral density. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  D M Green,et al.  Profile analysis: critical bands and duration. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  P. O. Thompson,et al.  The Frequency Selectivity of the Ear as Determined by Masking Experiments , 1950 .

[17]  D M Green,et al.  Further studies of auditory profile analysis. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.