Lidocaine patch 5% and its positive impact on pain qualities in osteoarthritis: results of a pilot 2-week, open-label study using the Neuropathic Pain Scale

SUMMARY Objective: To determine the impact of the lidocaine patch 5% on distinct pain qualities associated with osteoarthritis (OA) through use of the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS), an assessment tool designed to assess intensity of various pain qualities (i.e. sharp, dull). Patients and methods: Patients were enrolled in a prospective, open-label, non-randomized, parallel-group, 2-week study involving 8 clinical trial sites in the United States. Eligible patients had radiographic evidence of OA involving one or both knees and reported moderate-to-severe pain (despite prn or stable doses of analgesics) on the NPS at study enrollment. Patients on prn analgesics were discontinued from all analgesic regimens prior to study entry and received lidocaine patch 5% as monotherapy. Those on stable doses of analgesics were continued on their other analgesic regimens with no additions or dose alterations allowed other than the lidocaine patch 5% as add-on therapy. The lidocaine patch 5% was applied to the area of maximal pain, using no more than a total of 4 patches changed every 24 h. Effectiveness was measured by change from baseline to Week 2 in 4 composite measures of the NPS: NPS-10, NPS-4, NPS-8, and NPS-non-allodynia. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs), dermal assessment of application site(s), and skin sensory testing. Results: In the combined patient population (n = 100), 2 weeks of treatment with lidocaine patch 5% significantly improved all 4 NPS composite measures ( p < 0.001). Separate analyses by subgroups revealed significant improvements in all 4 composite measures for both the monotherapy group (n = 12; p < 0.01) and add-on therapy group (n = 88; p < 0.001). No treatment-related AEs were reported for the monotherapy group. In the add-on therapy group, 5 patients experienced mild-to-moderate treatment-related AEs. Conclusions: In patients with moderate-to-severe OA of the knee, 2 weeks of treatment with the lidocaine patch 5% significantly reduces the intensity of pain qualities as measured by all 4 NPS composite measures. Our results coincide with previously reported improvements in pain and physical function in the same patient population, as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index. Measuring the various qualities of pain appears to be a valid approach for assessing clinical outcomes in the treatment of OA pain. Pain measures such as the NPS can capture the multi-dimensional properties of a patient's pain experience and may offer clinicians the possibility to identify differential effects of analgesic treatments on various pain qualities associated with OA.

[1]  B. Galer,et al.  Safety and Tolerability of the Lidocaine Patch 5%, a Targeted Peripheral Analgesic: A Review of the Literature , 2003, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[2]  Thomas J. Schnitzer,et al.  Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: 2000 update , 2000 .

[3]  M. Rowbotham,et al.  Topical lidocaine patch relieves postherpetic neuralgia more effectively than a vehicle topical patch: results of an enriched enrollment study , 1999, Pain.

[4]  F. Burch,et al.  Lidocaine patch 5% improves pain, stiffness, and physical function in osteoarthritis pain patients. A prospective, multicenter, open-label effectiveness trial. , 2004, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[5]  M. Nagashima,et al.  Characterization of infiltrating T cells and Th1/Th2-type cytokines in the synovium of patients with osteoarthritis. , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[6]  M. Rowbotham,et al.  The Lidocaine Patch 5% Effectively Treats All Neuropathic Pain Qualities: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, 3-Week Efficacy Study With Use of the Neuropathic Pain Scale , 2002, The Clinical journal of pain.

[7]  M. Fukuda,et al.  Association between arthroscopic diagnosis of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis and synovial fluid nitric oxide levels. , 1999, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[8]  C. Argoff TOPICAL ANALGESICS: A REVIEW OF RECENT CLINICAL TRIALS AND THEIR APPLICATION TO CLINICAL PRACTICE * , 2003 .

[9]  R. Hines,et al.  Use of lidocaine patch 5% for chronic low back pain: a report of four cases. , 2002, Pain medicine.

[10]  B. Galer,et al.  Topical lidocaine patch relieves a variety of neuropathic pain conditions: an open-label study. , 2000, The Clinical journal of pain.

[11]  J. Bogousslavsky,et al.  Efficacy of lidocaine patch 5% in the treatment of focal peripheral neuropathic pain syndromes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study , 2003, Pain.

[12]  R. Bouillon,et al.  Calcitriol Improves Streptozotocin-induced Diabetes and Recovers Bone Mineral Density in Diabetic Rats , 2004, Calcified Tissue International.

[13]  J. Hollander ARTHRITIS AND ALLIED CONDITIONS , 1949 .

[14]  C. Argoff New Analgesics for Neuropathic Pain: The Lidocaine Patch , 2000, The Clinical journal of pain.

[15]  A. Woolf,et al.  Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. , 2003, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[16]  M. Rowbotham,et al.  Lidocaine patch: double-blind controlled study of a new treatment method for post-herpetic neuralgia , 1996, Pain.

[17]  A. J. Carter,et al.  Analgesic activity of a novel use‐dependent sodium channel blocker, crobenetine, in mono‐arthritic rats , 2001, British journal of pharmacology.

[18]  T. Jensen,et al.  Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Pain , 1997 .

[19]  S. Moncada,et al.  Increased concentrations of nitrite in synovial fluid and serum samples suggest increased nitric oxide synthesis in rheumatic diseases. , 1992, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[20]  B. Gertz,et al.  Renal Effects of COX-2-Selective Inhibitors , 2001, American Journal of Nephrology.

[21]  Tomoyuki Saito,et al.  Increased cellular infiltrate in inflammatory synovia of osteoarthritic knees. , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[22]  Sebastian Schneeweiss,et al.  Relationship Between Selective Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors and Acute Myocardial Infarction in Older Adults , 2004, Circulation.

[23]  Y. Masubuchi,et al.  Structural requirements for the hepatotoxicity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in isolated rat hepatocytes. , 1998, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[24]  M. Adachi,et al.  Inhibitory effect of lidocaine on T cells from patients with allergic asthma. , 2002, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[25]  Bernard I. Comron,et al.  Arthritis and Allied Conditions , 1940, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[26]  L. C. Russell,et al.  The effect of intravenous lidocaine, tocainide, and mexiletine on spontaneously active fibers originating in rat sciatic neuromas , 1989, Pain.

[27]  C. Helmick,et al.  Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. , 1998, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[28]  A. Laupacis,et al.  Cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors versus non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and congestive heart failure outcomes in elderly patients: a population-based cohort study , 2004, The Lancet.