Schema induction in children's analogical problem solving.

Three experiments were conducted to explore the ability of school-age children to transfer solutions to analogous problems. This research addressed the issue of how the variability of procedural features in source examples facilitates the induction of a general problem schema and, thus, promotes subsequent transfer. Children were asked to solve a series of problems analogous to Luchins's (1942) classic water jar problems. All the problems shared a common isomorphic structure and a general solution but required either similar or different specific procedures. Children who experienced problems with variant procedural features were more likely than those who experienced problems with invariant procedural features to construct a general problem schema and to solve novel problems requiring unfamiliar procedures. This research sheds light on the cognitive mechanisms involved in strategy generalization and analogical problem solving.

[1]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  R. Sternberg.  Advances in the psychology of human intelligence , 1982 .

[3]  S. Cormier,et al.  Transfer of learning: Contemporary research and applications. , 1987 .

[4]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. , 1989 .

[5]  B. Ross,et al.  Generalizing from the use of earlier examples in problem solving , 1990 .

[6]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Preschool children can learn to transfer: Learning to learn and learning from example , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  D. Cummins.  Role of analogical reasoning in the induction of problem categories. , 1992 .

[8]  U. Goswami,et al.  Analogical reasoning and cognitive development. , 1996, Advances in child development and behavior.

[9]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer. , 1987 .

[10]  R. Siegler,et al.  How Does Change Occur: A Microgenetic Study of Number Conservation , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  D. Gentner.  Metaphor as Structure Mapping: The Relational Shift. , 1988 .

[12]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Protagonist, Theme, and Goal Object: Effects of Surface Features on Analogical Transfer. , 1993 .

[13]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Analogical transfer: From schematic pictures to problem solving , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Z. Chen,et al.  Children's analogical problem solving: the effects of superficial, structural, and procedural similarity. , 1996, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[15]  E. Sander,et al.  Analogical transfer as guided by an abstraction process: the case of learning by doing in text editing. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Zhe Chen,et al.  From beyond to within their grasp: the rudiments of analogical problem solving in 10- and 13-month-olds. , 1997 .

[17]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Advances in developmental psychology , 1981 .

[18]  U. Goswami.  Analogical Reasoning: What Develops? A Review of Research and Theory. , 1991 .

[19]  A. Ortony,et al.  Similarity and Analogical Reasoning , 1991 .

[20]  Mary Jo Kane,et al.  Young children's mental models determine analogical transfer across problems with a common goal structure * , 1986 .

[21]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Use of examples and procedures in problem solving , 1991 .

[22]  J. Greeno.  Hobbits and orcs: Acquisition of a sequential concept ☆ , 1974 .

[23]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  A schema-based theory of transfer. , 1996 .

[24]  D. Gentner.  Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[25]  Z Chen,et al.  Intention and outcome: key components of causal structure facilitating mapping in children's analogical transfer. , 1992, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[26]  Kevin F. Miller,et al.  Reasoning and problem solving. , 1998 .

[27]  D. Gentner,et al.  Systematicity and Surface Similarity in the Development of Analogy. Technical Report No. 358. , 1985 .

[28]  R. Siegler,et al.  Mechanisms of cognitive development. , 1989, Annual review of psychology.

[29]  M. Alibali,et al.  Children's Thinking , 1986 .

[30]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  The role of analogy in transfer between similar problem states , 1974 .

[31]  G. Halford.  Children's Understanding: The Development of Mental Models , 1993 .

[32]  Alan G. Kamhi,et al.  Problem Solving, Recall, and Isomorphic Transfer among Third-Grade and Sixth-Grade Children. , 1987 .

[33]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Immediate and delayed transfer of training effects in statistical reasoning. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  B. Ross.  Distinguishing Types of Superficial Similarities: Different Effects on the Access and Use of Earlier Problems , 1989 .

[35]  Donald P. Marzolf,et al.  Transfer in young children's understanding of spatial representations. , 1994, Child development.

[36]  J. P. Das,et al.  Intelligence and learning , 1981 .

[37]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition and Instruction , 1993 .

[38]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Positive and negative transfer in analogical problem solving by 6-year-old children , 1989 .

[40]  M. Bassok.  Transfer of domain-specific problem-solving procedures , 1990 .