Is Cell sorting caused by differences in the work of intercellular adhesion? A critique of the Steinberg hypothesis.

Abstract The differential adhesion hypothesis, developed by Malcolm Steinberg, proposes that the histotypic sorting out behavior of aggregated cells is mechanistically equivalent to certain aspects of liquid surface tension, specifically the spontaneous separation of immiscible liquids of differing surface tension. According to Steinberg's hypothesis, the adhesive forces between aggregated cells play essentially the same role in cell sorting as are played by intermolecular attractive forces in liquid surface tension. In this paper I discuss a number of crucial distinctions between intermolecular attraction (in liquids) and intercellular adhesion (in aggregates). First, liquid drops are closed systems thermodynamically whereas aggregates of living cells can generate an indeterminate amount of metabolic energy capable of altering cell positions and adhesions. Secondly, intercellular adhesions are more than just close range attractions since cells can be held together by forces in addition to those which originally pulled them together. Third, the breakage of intercellular adhesions need not be simply the reverse, thermodynamically, of the formation of those adhesions. And fourthly, because intercellular adhesion is generally concentrated at relatively small foci such as desmosomes, a maximization of intercellular adhesion does not necessarily require a maximization of intercellular contact area, or vice versa. In addition, several alternative hypotheses are proposed, each of which is theoretically capable of explaining cell sorting and the other surface tension-like aspects of cell aggregate behavior which Steinberg has sought to explain as consequences of differential adhesion. In particular, a differential surface contraction hypothesis is proposed, according to which cell sorting and related phenomena are the results of cell surface contractions induced to occur over those portions of the cell surface which are exposed to the surrounding culture medium. Because of the evidence that various invagination type movements of embryonic epithelia are caused by cell surface contractions, it is suggested that differential surface contraction is the most likely explanation of histotypic cell sorting. A number of experiments are suggested by which these various hypotheses might be tested.