Feasibility of an email-based electronic screening and brief intervention (e-SBI) to college students in Sweden.

An email-based electronic screening and brief intervention (e-SBI) with personalized normative feedback on alcohol habits was offered to all 3,875 second term students at Linköping University, Sweden. The students received an email with a link to a computerized alcohol habit test and were offered personalized feedback directly on the computer screen. The students evaluated the test and were asked to state whether they were going to consider changing or actually change their alcohol habits. The response rate was 44%, with 742 female and 843 male students participating. The students displayed a strong gender difference in drinking pattern. A three-fold higher percentage of males than females were risky drinkers with regard to a high average weekly volume consumption. The gender differences were less pronounced regarding heavy episodic drinking that was reported by 51% of the females and 70.5% of the males. The email-based computerized normative feedback was appreciated by the students and one-third of the females and one-fifth of the males believed that they would benefit from the normative feedback; 8% of the females and 3% of the males believed that they would actually change their habits after the feedback. Students with a risky drinking pattern, previous experiences of blackouts, being dissatisfied with their current drinking and students that had considered to change their habits before the e-SBI, yielded a stronger motivation to change their drinking after having performed the intervention compared to students without such characteristics. The e-SBI with normative feedback was simple to administer and has the potential to be used repeatedly and on a large scale with minimum effort in terms of cost and time.

[1]  A. Tesser,et al.  The effects of relevance and quality of another's performance on interpersonal closeness. , 1981 .

[2]  M. Sliwinski,et al.  Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at-risk college drinkers. , 2002, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[3]  S. Walters In Praise of Feedback: An Effective Intervention for College Students Who Are Heavy Drinkers , 2000, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[4]  Scott T Walters,et al.  Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: what, why and for whom? , 2005, Addictive behaviors.

[5]  Crystal L. Park,et al.  Positive and negative consequences of alcohol consumption in college students. , 2004, Addictive behaviors.

[6]  M. Larimer,et al.  Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students. , 1991, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[7]  Henry Wechsler,et al.  Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24. , 2002, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[8]  R. Vuchinich,et al.  A comparison of personalized feedback for college student drinkers delivered with and without a motivational interview. , 2004, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[9]  E. Chiauzzi,et al.  Demon rum: high-tech solutions to an age-old problem. , 2005, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[10]  K. Carey,et al.  Developing discrepancy within self-regulation theory: use of personalized normative feedback and personal strivings with heavy-drinking college students. , 2004, Addictive behaviors.

[11]  H. Wechsler,et al.  Trends in College Binge Drinking During a Period of Increased Prevention Efforts: Findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study Surveys: 1993–2001 , 2002, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[12]  W. Miller,et al.  Effects of Normative Feedback on Consumption among Heavy Drinking College Students , 1995, Journal of drug education.

[13]  Clayton Neighbors,et al.  Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. , 2004, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[14]  Joseph H. Miller,et al.  Alcohol problem recognition as a function of own and others' perceived drinking. , 2004, Addictive behaviors.

[15]  John A Cunningham,et al.  The role of relevancy in normative feedback for university students' drinking patterns. , 2003, Addictive behaviors.

[16]  H. Wechsler,et al.  More Canadian students drink but American students drink more: comparing college alcohol use in two countries. , 2002, Addiction.

[17]  M. Salaspuro,et al.  Alcohol-use patterns in young university students in Finland. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[18]  H. Wechsler,et al.  College Students Define Binge Drinking and Estimate Its Prevalence: Results of a National Survey , 2000, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[19]  Kypros Kypri,et al.  Acceptability of various brief intervention approaches for hazardous drinking among university students. , 2003, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[20]  Kypros Kypri,et al.  Web-based screening and brief intervention for hazardous drinking: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Addiction.