Research fund evaluation based on academic publication output analysis: the case of Chinese research fund evaluation
暂无分享,去创建一个
Yuntao Pan | Cheng Su | Hai-yan Wang | Ji-ping Gao | Lihua Zhai | Hong Wang | Yuntao Pan | Ji-ping Gao | Cheng Su | Lihua Zhai
[1] Di Zhang,et al. Biomimetic fabrication of WO3 for water splitting under visible light with high performance , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.
[2] Xianwen Wang,et al. Science funding and research output: a study on 10 countries , 2011, Scientometrics.
[3] Susan Bonzi,et al. Motivations for citation: A comparison of self citation and citation to others , 1991, Scientometrics.
[4] Kevin W. Boyack,et al. Metrics associated with NIH funding: a high-level view , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..
[5] Philip Shapira,et al. Funding acknowledgement analysis: an enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology , 2011, Scientometrics.
[6] Xu Bo. Quantitative Analysis of Papers Sponsored by Natural Science Foundation of China , 2011 .
[7] Mihail C. Roco,et al. Connecting NSF funding to patent innovation in nanotechnology (2001–2004) , 2006 .
[8] Philip Shapira,et al. Is There a Relationship between Research Sponsorship and Publication Impact? An Analysis of Funding Acknowledgments in Nanotechnology Papers , 2015, PloS one.
[9] Dangzhi Zhao,et al. Characteristics and impact of grant-funded research: a case study of the library and information science field , 2010, Scientometrics.
[10] Yishan Wu,et al. Regularity in the time-dependent distribution of the percentage of never-cited papers: An empirical pilot study based on the six journals , 2014, J. Informetrics.
[11] Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al. Approaching the "reward triangle": General analysis of the presence of funding acknowledgments and "peer interactive communication" in scientific publications , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[12] G. Lewison. Gastroenterology research in the United Kingdom: funding sources and impact , 1998, Gut.
[13] Henk F. Moed,et al. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation , 2009, Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis.
[14] Alan L. Porter,et al. How Does National Scientific Funding Support Emerging Interdisciplinary Research: A Comparison Study of Big Data Research in the US and China , 2016, PloS one.
[15] Xin Xu,et al. Funding ratios in social science: the perspective of countries/territories level and comparison with natural sciences , 2015, Scientometrics.
[16] Ma Feng,et al. A survey study on motivations for citation: A case study on periodicals research and library and information science community in China , 2009 .
[17] Michael M. Hopkins,et al. Funding Data from Publication Acknowledgments: Coverage, Uses, and Limitations , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[18] Ian M. Handley,et al. Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[19] Shahbaz Khan,et al. Footprints of water and energy inputs in food production - global perspectives. , 2009 .
[20] Zewen Hu,et al. A probe into causes of non-citation based on survey data , 2015, ArXiv.
[21] Li Tang,et al. Funding acknowledgment analysis: Queries and caveats , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[22] E. Garfield. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.
[23] Philip Shapira,et al. The impact of research funding on scientific outputs: Evidence from six smaller European countries , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[24] Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al. Characteristics of journal impact factors: The effects of uncitedness and citation distribution on the understanding of journal impact factors , 2005, Scientometrics.
[25] Mihail C. Roco,et al. Global nanotechnology development from 1991 to 2012: patents, scientific publications, and effect of NSF funding , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.
[26] John Rigby,et al. Looking for the impact of peer review: does count of funding acknowledgements really predict research impact? , 2012, Scientometrics.