NIH initiative to balance sex of animals in preclinical studies: generative questions to guide policy, implementation, and metrics

In May of 2014, the NIH Director together with the Director of the Office of Research on Women’s Health announced plans to take a multi-dimensional approach to address the over reliance on male cells and animals in preclinical research. The NIH is engaging the scientific community in the development of policies to improve the sex balance in research. The present, past, and future presidents of the Organization for the Study of Sex Differences, in order to encourage thoughtful discussion among scientists, pose a series of questions to generate ideas in three areas: 1. research strategies, 2. educational strategies, and 3. strategies to monitor effectiveness of policies to improve the sex balance in research. By promoting discussion within the scientific community, a consensus will evolve that will move science forward in a productive and effective manner.

[1]  Joy L. Johnson,et al.  Does a Change in Health Research Funding Policy Related to the Integration of Sex and Gender Have an Impact? , 2014, PloS one.

[2]  I. Zucker,et al.  Female mice liberated for inclusion in neuroscience and biomedical research , 2014, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[3]  G. J. de Vries,et al.  Printed in U.S.A. Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society doi: 10.1210/en.2003-1504 Minireview: Sex Differences in Adult and Developing Brains: Compensation, Compensation, Compensation , 2022 .

[4]  G. J. Vries,et al.  Minireview: Sex differences in adult and developing brains: compensation, compensation, compensation. , 2004 .

[5]  Theresa M. Wizemann,et al.  Exploring the biological contributions to human health: does sex matter? , 2001, Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine.

[6]  F. Collins,et al.  Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility , 2014, Nature.

[7]  J. Landowski,et al.  Zolpidem abuse, dependence and withdrawal syndrome: sex as susceptibility factor for adverse effects. , 2008, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[8]  J. Côté,et al.  First steps for integrating sex and gender considerations into basic experimental biomedical research , 2014, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[9]  K. Schenck-Gustafsson Handbook of clinical gender medicine , 2012 .

[10]  Doris A Taylor,et al.  Strategies and methods to study sex differences in cardiovascular structure and function: a guide for basic scientists , 2011, Biology of Sex Differences.

[11]  V. Muller Exploring the biological contributions to human health: does sex matter? , 2001, Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine.

[12]  A. Arnold,et al.  Strategies and methods for research on sex differences in brain and behavior. , 2005, Endocrinology.

[13]  J. Blaustein Animals have a sex, and so should titles and methods sections of articles in Endocrinology. , 2012, Endocrinology.

[14]  V. Miller,et al.  Reporting of sex as a variable in cardiovascular studies using cultured cells , 2011, Biology of Sex Differences.

[15]  I. Zucker,et al.  Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[16]  L. Arendt-Nielsen,et al.  Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: A consensus report , 2007, PAIN.

[17]  V. Regitz-Zagrosek Sex and Gender Differences in Pharmacology , 2012, Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology.

[18]  R. Douglas Fields,et al.  NIH policy: Status quo is also costly , 2014, Nature.

[19]  Virginia M Miller,et al.  In pursuit of scientific excellence: sex matters. , 2012, Journal of applied physiology.

[20]  Sex and the basic scientist: is it time to embrace Title IX? , 2013, Biology of Sex Differences.

[21]  C. E. McCormack,et al.  Do you know the sex of your cells? , 2014, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[22]  Francis S Collins,et al.  Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies , 2014, Nature.