Conceptions of objects across categories: childhood patterns resemble those of adults.

Studies of category-specific disorders have suggested that categories of living and non-living things vary in the properties that are most salient to recognition. Studies of the object features generated by normal adults have also revealed different patterns of responses to different categories. These adult patterns are likely to originate in childhood, but there are few reports of children's verbal conceptions of objects, and none at present of objects from different categories. This paper investigates the development of object conceptions, in a large group of children, aged 3 years 7 months to 11 years 6 months, in response to 'What is a -- ?' questions directed to 72 objects, selected from two categories of living things (animals and fruit/vegetables) and two categories of artifacts (implements and vehicles). Proportions of perceptual-to-functional features provided by the children to living and non-living things varied with the range of features defined as functions, just as studies of adults have found. Apart from the distribution of superordinate responses, which were significantly more salient to living than to non-living categories, no other property separated the two categories. Only the category of implements could be distinguished from the other categories on the basis of the features generated. It is argued that the perceptual-functional theory of category-specific disorders receives little support from this study, but that in general the distribution of features generated by young children is similar to that produced by normal adults.

[1]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. , 1991 .

[2]  J. M. Anglin,et al.  Qualitative developments in the content and form of children's definitions. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  B. Jankovič,et al.  Passive Transfer of ‘Allergic’ Encephalomyelitis with Antibrain Serum injected into the Lateral Ventricle of the Brain , 1965, Nature.

[4]  B McGhee-Bidlack,et al.  The development of noun definitions: a metalinguistic analysis , 1991, Journal of Child Language.

[5]  J. Carroll,et al.  Word Frequency and Age of Acquisition as Determiners of Picture-Naming Latency , 1973 .

[6]  R. Watson Relevance and Definition , 1995, Journal of Child Language.

[7]  E. Warrington,et al.  Evidence for modality-specific meaning systems in the brain , 1988, Nature.

[8]  T. Shallice,et al.  When Living Things and Other ‘Sensory Quality’ Categories Behave in the Same Fashion: a Novel Category Specificity Effect. , 2001, Neurocase.

[9]  Elaine Funnell,et al.  JBR: A reassessment of concept familiarity and a category-specific disorder for living things , 1996 .

[10]  L. Arcuri,et al.  Cognitive and linguistic factors in the development of word definitions , 1988, Journal of Child Language.

[11]  R. de Lisi,et al.  The development of noun definition , 1981, Journal of Child Language.

[12]  Bonnie E. Litowitz,et al.  Learning to make definitions , 1977, Journal of Child Language.

[13]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[14]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Cascade processes in picture identification , 1988 .

[15]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Ken McRae,et al.  Category - Specific semantic deficits , 2008 .

[17]  K. McGregor,et al.  Semantic representation and naming in young children. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[18]  Elaine Funnell,et al.  Categories of knowledge? unfamiliar aspects of living and nonliving things , 1992 .

[19]  E. Funnell,et al.  Age of acquisition for naming and knowing: A new hypothesis , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  A J Parkin,et al.  Naming Impairments following Recovery from Herpes Simplex Encephalitis: Category-Specific? , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[21]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[23]  C. Snow,et al.  The development of definitional skill , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[24]  L. Tyler,et al.  ‘Two Eyes of a See-through’: Impaired and Intact Semantic Knowledge in a Case of Selective Deficit for Living Things , 1998 .

[25]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  J. M. Anglin,et al.  Expression of Superordinates in Children's Word Definitions. , 1997 .

[27]  L. K. Tyler,et al.  Conceptual Structure and the Structure of Concepts: A Distributed Account of Category-Specific Deficits , 2000, Brain and Language.

[28]  T. Shallice,et al.  Category specific semantic impairments , 1984 .

[29]  C. Snow,et al.  Longitudinal measurement of growth in definitional skill , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[30]  Kenneth Gilhooly,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in lexical and episodic memory tasks , 1979 .

[31]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[32]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  M Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[34]  David Gaffan,et al.  A Spurious Category-Specific Visual Agnosia for Living Things in Normal Human and Nonhuman Primates , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deep Dyslexia: A Case Study of , 1993 .

[36]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Object Names and Their Relation to Adult Estimates and Other Variables , 1997 .

[37]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Domain-Specific Knowledge Systems in the Brain: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.