Distinct and combined responses to environmental geometry and features in a working-memory reorientation task in rats and chicks

The original provocative formulation of the ‘geometric module’ hypothesis was based on a working-memory task in rats which suggested that spontaneous reorientation behavior is based solely on the environmental geometry and is impervious to featural cues. Here, we retested that claim by returning to a spontaneous navigation task with rats and domestic chicks, using a single prominent featural cue (a striped wall) within a rectangular arena. Experiments 1 and 2 tested the influence of geometry and features separately. In Experiment 1, we found that both rats and chicks used environmental geometry to compute locations in a plain rectangular arena. In Experiment 2, while chicks failed to spontaneously use a striped wall in a square arena, rats showed a modest influence of the featural cue as a local marker to the goal. The critical third experiment tested the striped wall inside the rectangular arena. We found that although chicks solely relied on geometry, rats navigated based on both environmental geometry and the featural cue. While our findings with rats are contrary to classic claims of an impervious geometric module, they are consistent with the hypothesis that navigation by boundaries and features may involve distinct underlying cognitive computations. We conclude by discussing the similarities and differences in feature-use across tasks and species.

[1]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  From natural geometry to spatial cognition , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[2]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Two systems of spatial representation underlying navigation , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The neuroscience of learning: beyond the Hebbian synapse. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[4]  T. Regier,et al.  An adaptive cue combination model of human spatial reorientation , 2017, Cognition.

[5]  Laurie L Bloomfield,et al.  Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: features overshadow geometry , 2005, Biology Letters.

[6]  K. Jeffery,et al.  The Boundary Vector Cell Model of Place Cell Firing and Spatial Memory , 2006, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[7]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Navigation by environmental geometry: the use of zebrafish as a model , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[8]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Reorientation and Landmark-Guided Search by Young Children , 2006, Psychological science.

[9]  R. C. Honey,et al.  Integration of geometric with luminance information in the rat: evidence from within-compound associations. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[10]  J. Pearce,et al.  Potentiation and overshadowing between landmarks and environmental geometric cues , 2011, Learning & behavior.

[11]  D. Olton,et al.  Food-searching strategies in young rats: Win-shift predominates over win-stay. , 1978 .

[12]  Yutaka Kosaki,et al.  Overshadowing of geometry learning by discrete landmarks in the water maze: effects of relative salience and relative validity of competing cues. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[13]  Thomas J. Wills,et al.  Long-term plasticity in hippocampal place-cell representation of environmental geometry , 2002, Nature.

[14]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Cognitive effects of language on human navigation , 2011, Cognition.

[15]  Anthony McGregor,et al.  Revaluation of geometric cues reduces landmark discrimination via within-compound associations , 2014, Learning & behavior.

[16]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Independent effects of geometry and landmark in a spontaneous reorientation task: a study of two species of fish , 2012, Animal Cognition.

[17]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology , 1984 .

[18]  J. Pearce,et al.  Between-cue associations influence searching for a hidden goal in an environment with a distinctive shape. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[19]  John M. Pearce,et al.  Hippocampal lesions disrupt navigation based on cognitive maps but not heading vectors , 1998, Nature.

[20]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Navigation as a source of geometric knowledge: Young children’s use of length, angle, distance, and direction in a reorientation task , 2012, Cognition.

[21]  J. Pearce,et al.  Changes in attention to relevant and irrelevant stimuli during spatial learning. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[22]  Joseph M. Austen,et al.  Dorsolateral striatal lesions impair navigation based on landmark-goal vectors but facilitate spatial learning based on a “cognitive map” , 2015, Learning & memory.

[23]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Spatial Impairment and Memory in Genetic Disorders: Insights from Mouse Models , 2017, Brain sciences.

[24]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Hippocampus and medial striatum dissociation during goal navigation by geometry or features in the domestic chick: An immediate early gene study , 2016, Hippocampus.

[25]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Chicks, like children, spontaneously reorient by three-dimensional environmental geometry, not by image matching , 2012, Biology Letters.

[26]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons , 1996, Nature.

[27]  R. L. Fantz Form preferences in newly hatched chicks. , 1957, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[28]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  The boundary-based view of spatial cognition: a synthesis , 2017, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[29]  永福 智志 The Organization of Learning , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Peter M. Jones,et al.  Potentiation, overshadowing, and blocking of spatial learning based on the shape of the environment. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[31]  R. Lund,et al.  Receptive field properties of single neurons in rat primary visual cortex. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Alexandra D. Twyman,et al.  Young children's use of features to reorient is more than just associative: further evidence against a modular view of spatial processing. , 2010, Developmental science.

[33]  R. Over,et al.  Spatial acuity of the chicken , 1981, Brain Research.

[34]  M Zanforlin,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[35]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Space in the brain: how the hippocampal formation supports spatial cognition , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[37]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Modeling place fields in terms of the cortical inputs to the hippocampus , 2000, Hippocampus.

[38]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Boundary Vector Cells in the Subiculum of the Hippocampal Formation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  J. Pearce,et al.  The 36th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: An associative analysis of spatial learning , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Animals as Natural Geometers , 2009 .

[41]  M. Moser,et al.  Representation of Geometric Borders in the Entorhinal Cortex , 2008, Science.

[42]  Joseph M. Austen,et al.  Within-compound associations explain potentiation and failure to overshadow learning based on geometry by discrete landmarks. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[43]  Kathryn A Davis,et al.  Electrophysiological Signatures of Spatial Boundaries in the Human Subiculum , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  M. Cole,et al.  Potentiation and overshadowing of shape by wall color in a kite-shaped maze using rats in a foraging task , 2011 .

[45]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Representation of environmental shape in the hippocampus of domestic chicks (Gallus gallus) , 2017, Brain Structure and Function.

[46]  Valter Tucci,et al.  Working memory and reference memory tests of spatial navigation in mice (Mus musculus). , 2015, Journal of comparative psychology.

[47]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Environmental Geometry Aligns the Hippocampal Map during Spatial Reorientation , 2017, Current Biology.

[48]  J. Pearce,et al.  A landmark blocks searching for a hidden platform in an environment with a distinctive shape after extended pretraining , 2009, Learning & behavior.

[49]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[50]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[51]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[52]  Edward J Golob,et al.  Differences between appetitive and aversive reinforcement on reorientation in a spatial working memory task , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[53]  Rachel Bhushan Spatial representation from birth to old age: Insights from comparative neurobiology and behavioral genomics. , 2018 .

[54]  Thomas J. Wills,et al.  Boundary coding in the rat subiculum , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  W. Gerstner,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Insights from a rodent navigation model. , 2009, Psychological review.

[56]  Christian F. Doeller,et al.  Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Matthew G. Buckley,et al.  Shape Shifting: Local Landmarks Interfere With Navigation by, and Recognition of, Global Shape , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  M A Good,et al.  Hippocampal lesions disrupt navigation based on the shape of the environment. , 2004, Behavioral neuroscience.

[59]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Animals' use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: effects of the size of the experimental space , 2005, Cognition.

[60]  Nora S Newcombe,et al.  Why size counts: children's spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures. , 2008, Developmental science.

[61]  T. Hartley,et al.  The Neurobiology of Mammalian Navigation , 2018, Current Biology.

[62]  Ken Cheng,et al.  25 years of research on the use of geometry in spatial reorientation: a current theoretical perspective , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[63]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  The role of learning and environmental geometry in landmark-based spatial reorientation of fish (Xenotoca eiseni) , 2020, PloS one.

[64]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Features enhance the encoding of geometry , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[65]  J. Taube The head direction signal: origins and sensory-motor integration. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.